Mayelesa

No one force players for buy mount, it is convenience item only lol. And also game have quest free mount.

Sometimes, players should think before suggestion xD

hey, was wondering if could get my corsola, i think its been 5 days now and i payed rush order so im wondering :)! Hi your order is already done, please contact with Sovereignx when you online, he in hold your order. The information of your order: SoVeReiGnX - Last Sunday finished at 9:29 PM Corsola LV27 252DEF|252HP|6 SPDEF + LV90 - B4dingooo 183k - Taken by Sovereignx [paid] [RUSH]

It is not relevant.... it not about buy bundle or not, it is about open economic and retail sale is suitable.... You can look the reason in here too https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=47105

I want keep current system. It is very frustration if changing to give away pokemon easy as I am PvE, I enjoy farm and sell it. If pokemon can get easy, nothing called market, because no one want buy my pokemon as everyone can get it. Trade chat die soon, MMO game become single player, or Smogon time. It can fun at begin, but after that nothing keep me to the game. I have nothing to do, PvP? Mehh, if that I will play some special for only PvP rather than. I am fan of RPG and hunting is the part of it. Loot should be hard to get, if it easy.... you want destroy my fun? T_T

Your whole point only for proved that it need to heal after each e4 battle, which all points is really not concern anything related to suggestion. In short, you only want to make saving the money for items in E4. As the result, you point is invalid and not reliable as not relevant. If you want more static layout, go into PvP. It is advantage of fast sweeper, which you said is nothing called is tactics. Don't tell me that you cannot using staller as need using potions is unbalance. Per E4 have weakness so if you want more tactics, seeking and abusing about it. You free using 1 pokemon for per E4 basing on the weakness of them. Even in original game, it also don't heal per E4 battle, which need to brings back up items. Also it is money sink hole feature in MMO game. Your WoT just make me think, why you write so long with the invalid and not related to your main suggestion "after each e4 battle your whole team gets healed up"? Here is the guides you maybe want to look: https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24239&start=40 and https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=122&t=25330 as I see they discussion to some alternative team also. One more thing, the PvP and PvE is different, also in PvP people also use fast sweeper. I will recommend you pass the whole story first and then focus on build PvP, it is your choice, your style. Talking about waste money for items heal and revive is very invalid in PvE/story, which these items only can use to that. PvP don't use these items. And E4 is part of PvE/story.

It mean keep all move? When you online? It 65k btw When you online? It 60k btw

It just make economic and boss reward ruin... why because for example you only need only every item consumption PvP fo the whole life. And then others will never using or just waste or sell... But how you can sell if everyone only need 6 per item consumption. This suggestion is better <3

not code yet i think

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_post_facto_law go for it Did you know that in laws department and also academic study, wikipedia is the trash source and not acceptable? Please write your own thesis with your argument, not copy paste from some where. If you not know how to structure, let me help 3 core point: Introduction Literature review Measurement You just make me sad when I though you have great view to that area..... P/s: even reference also not acceptable to wikipedia source also.

You do not get hung for crimes before laws. You're argument has no merit what so ever, punishments come after not before. I could literally write a thesis on how its not the case. "Rules always has somewhere not fullfil, and as real case, when the first illegal happen, people evaluation/punished it and then adding/adjust the rules" Punishments not always come from after. So if have the first case (which never happen before) in court, the criminal will be innocent? Your state is wrong in real case. And write your thesis please. I need to see your point in your thesis too.

I'm not sure where you realize you are. This is the internet. If there is no rule listed people will do whatever they please. If admins don't approve, they will create a rule to prevent such behavior. EX: No cursing or keeping chat and forums PG If that rule did not exist people would be cursing all the time. . . Using common sense ofc would suggest that you should definitely NOT harass someone and verbally abuse them. Same could go for abusing an UNFINISHED pvp system. But again, the above rule I used as an example is actually listed in the rules.. so it goes without saying that a rule stating you can be banned for INTENTIONALLY leaving a pvp match to deny the opponent a coin should also be implemented. So internet mean distinguish to community and ethics factor? Human is main factor for using internet, and any related to human will always have community and ethics factors. You totally don't know why rule have, and how rule establish indeed. Let say your example, NO cursing or keeping chat and forum PG in rule. Okay, so now we swear to other player, and then when GM banned you. You said "Hey, it not have rules for that, unbanned me!" So let say, you will be first banned as it not suitable for community and ethics factors. And then after that, GM write the rules to that. Make sense. That how people make rules, rule not come from nowhere, rule come from the things happen and practices. I will not say that GM do right, but the way you discussion just wrong.

Exploit what? It's by design. Abuse what? The same thing everyone in pvp has "abused" since it started, THERE IS NO FORFEIT BUTTON YOU HAVE TO DC. Until they bring in the regulations they should not be enforcing. You like examples how about this. You're riding your mount, and now your banned. It's not against the rules that you can't ride your mount, but oh well bad luck, you should haven't been doing it. A warning and a change in rules would have been applicable, a ban absolutely not. Weak example. You riding your mount - it not interact to other player, and no ethics issues. You d/c battle, winner not get coins - it interact to other player, also have ethic issues.

This isn't an ethics and sociology forum, it's a straight forward, has an existing rule been broken or not (black or white), and the answer is no. So we just find something not write yet in rule, and exploit it? The rule was implemented through the principle of ethics and also change overtime basing on the changing of community. Similar why rules of government has been implemented and changed overtime. Rules always has somewhere not fullfil, and as real case, when the first illegal happen, people evaluation/punished it and then adding/adjust the rules. That is the way of improving... Let's say why we have rules? What rule based on? This is not based on the community and ethics factors? So let say, if the rule not said "insult people will be banned", you have right to insult people? And let I say something, you not understand "exploit" and "abuse" as it already write in general rules.