Oscar Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 i suggest that the starter cannot be tradable like the legendaries, with this way the join that each trainer make with their first pokemon, that protect of all warning, is not broke with a trade Link to comment https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/topic/46609-starter-not-tradable/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saitaeia Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 It's a cool idea - your starter Pokemon being OT, and that OT not being transferrable meaning the Pokemon has additional meaning. However, many people aren't satisfied with their original Pokemon, so it would have to be something incredible stats-wise to warrant the keeping of that starter being mandatory. On top of that, not all people like the initial starters. And, if the stats in question were applied, it would lead to a highly imbalanced PVP meta in which it was starters-only - and didn't reflect the true competitive nature of PVP/PRO. Link to comment https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/topic/46609-starter-not-tradable/#findComment-286127 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest SugarRed9 Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 I think this idea would be cute, but I would highly dislike having a naive bulbasaur with all ivs under ten taking up space in box q.q Link to comment https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/topic/46609-starter-not-tradable/#findComment-286128 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oscar Posted October 6, 2016 Author Share Posted October 6, 2016 283144 I think this idea would be cute, but I would highly dislike having a naive bulbasaur with all ivs under ten taking up space in box q.q you could to release it, (and it will go to zafari zone to wait by other trainer find and catch it, and it would be tradable for the others trainers) but not tradable Link to comment https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/topic/46609-starter-not-tradable/#findComment-286129 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oscar Posted October 6, 2016 Author Share Posted October 6, 2016 283140 It's a cool idea - your starter Pokemon being OT, and that OT not being transferrable meaning the Pokemon has additional meaning. However, many people aren't satisfied with their original Pokemon, so it would have to be something incredible stats-wise to warrant the keeping of that starter being mandatory. On top of that, not all people like the initial starters. And, if the stats in question were applied, it would lead to a highly imbalanced PVP meta in which it was starters-only - and didn't reflect the true competitive nature of PVP/PRO. yes, it is your first pokemon in each region, you starter is the first pokemon that take care you, it is different to the others, and with this suggestion (make thems not tradable) the starter can to make the difference with the others wilds pokemons. The starters are special, it is your first pokemon in each region, if it has bad iv or nature you can to catch others in their habitats and delete your starter. Link to comment https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/topic/46609-starter-not-tradable/#findComment-286130 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oscar Posted October 10, 2016 Author Share Posted October 10, 2016 i suggest to make the starter pokemon not tradable and this have a neutral nature (hardy, docile, serious, bashful, quirky), with this way the starter between trainers dont will be better than others starter excepting by the ivs. if a trainer wants to get one of the pokemon starters with a certain nature should to farm it with a pokemon that have the ability syncronize Link to comment https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/topic/46609-starter-not-tradable/#findComment-286131 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest SugarRed9 Posted October 10, 2016 Share Posted October 10, 2016 285963 i suggest to make the starter pokemon not tradable and this have a neutral nature (hardy, docile, serious, bashful, quirky), with this way the starter between trainers dont will be better than others starter excepting by the ivs. if a trainer wants to get one of the pokemon starters with a certain nature should to farm it with a pokemon that have the ability syncronize I feel like this would be pretty fair if starters were not tradeable. Link to comment https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/topic/46609-starter-not-tradable/#findComment-286132 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamesling95 Posted October 10, 2016 Share Posted October 10, 2016 they alr execute get 4th badges in order to trade...I don't think this is something make sense Link to comment https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/topic/46609-starter-not-tradable/#findComment-286133 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest SugarRed9 Posted October 10, 2016 Share Posted October 10, 2016 285968 they alr execute get 4th badges in order to trade...I don't think this is something make sense What mush is trying to recommend is making your starter not traceable, you can trade one you hit your 4th badge, just you cannot trade your starter pkmn. Link to comment https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/topic/46609-starter-not-tradable/#findComment-286134 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oscar Posted October 10, 2016 Author Share Posted October 10, 2016 285969 285968 they alr execute get 4th badges in order to trade...I don't think this is something make sense What mush is trying to recommend is making your starter not traceable, you can trade one you hit your 4th badge, just you cannot trade your starter pkmn. Yes, that is i am trying to say, and that starters have a neutral nature Link to comment https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/topic/46609-starter-not-tradable/#findComment-286135 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts