in past post i see a suggerences that is in possibility of list to do. it is about a pokedex show some information like nature recommended, i am not agree with it becausee each pokemon have 1 nature and because the pokedex say that its nature is not recomended you have to throw out your pokemon until get a nature recommend.

 

i am not suggest to add the recommend nature.

 

i am agree with add the level in each pokemon evolved.

 

i am agree with add if a pokemon is common, rare, extremely rare, etc.

 

i suggest to add check box to classified the pokedex:

a check box to can visualize the kanto pokedex (pokemon 1-151)

a check box to can visualize the johto pokemon (pokemon 152-250)

a check box to can visualize the hoenn pokemon (pokemon 251-386)...

297378 -snip-

 

297378 pokedex show some information like nature recommended

 

There's is no absolute recommended nature for a Pokémon. Nature recommendation usually come from Smogon usage statistics. Also, it will be bad to teach new players about nature; it would distract them from their journey and teach them grind too soon.

297378 i am agree with add the level in each pokemon evolved.

 

I like it. If added, it will highly decrease the rate at which we check the Bulbapedia and other online Pokédex.

297378 i am agree with add if a pokemon is common, rare, extremely rare, etc.

 

This would be required for each route in the list of locations for each Pokémon. I don't know if it's a good thing, sincerely.

297378 i suggest to add check box to classified the pokedex:

 

This would be great, in my opinion. They can also add the search by type (1, 2 or both) and fix the box so we can write space to look for Pokémon like Mr. Mime, Nidoran M (same case for PC Storage system).