Naye

looking at the blue ladder i'd say probably not, yellow you'd have more luck at 520 ending up top 25 i only just started playing so I don't know how previous seasons ladders have looked, if 520 was just safe then,as you would assume the new coin system will have inflated ratings

ikr

It's not Kagawa is mistaken.

I like how people complain about the system but if it wasn't in place you would have exactly 0 coins and wouldn't be complaining. Just be patient.

is there an updated list with all the pokemon, and at which times they appear somewhere?

maybe they should just remove coins all together for winning like last season oh no you wouldn't want that?

ignore

Wikipedia really? hahahaha Work submitted to Wikipedia can be edited, used, and redistributed—by anyone Its not a reliable source at all as May State ^^ Oh wow why you mockin me, i feel so harras, I need gm.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_post_facto_law go for it i'll get right on it brad

You do not get hung for crimes before laws. You're argument has no merit what so ever, punishments come after not before. I could literally write a thesis on how its not the case.

See PVP dc's happen to everyone, I don't have anywhere near as many coins as I have wins, but I get on with it because what else can I do it wasn't a rule, I've just been banned because I happened to do it to two whiners, when in reality you're just as guilty and should be punished too. Doesn't matter if you break a rule (one that doesn't exist) once or a hundred times, you're still culpable.

Exploit what? It's by design. Abuse what? The same thing everyone in pvp has "abused" since it started, THERE IS NO FORFEIT BUTTON YOU HAVE TO DC. Until they bring in the regulations they should not be enforcing. You like examples how about this. You're riding your mount, and now your banned. It's not against the rules that you can't ride your mount, but oh well bad luck, you should haven't been doing it, see you in five days. Sound ridiculous? That's because it is. Also you're bringing up irrelevant topics that are not applicable to the thread, the reason I was banned is stated Intentional PVP Disconnect. Not for exploiting, not for abusing, not for anything else you want to make up, but for Intentional PVP Disconnect, and that is not a current rule. A warning and a change in rules would have sufficed, a ban absolutely not.

This isn't an ethics and sociology forum, it's a straight forward, has an existing rule been broken or not (black or white), and the answer is no.

I'll just leave it there. And? If there were a forfeit button you may have a point, but there is not. I would still dc if it gave 100 coins, how many other plays have is irrelevant, do you care how many I have? Also I'll just leave this here from 20/08 Because that's all it is? There are already many topics on changes to this system, this is just an announcement that you can get banned because the staff have failed to make such an announcement. I already have made the appeal as above this thread is just the announcement because staff hadn't. Exactly my point mate, they've enforced a non existent rule.

It's not an argument, it's black and white, you either break the rules or you haven't and I played completely within them, no wrong doing at all. If they want to change them, sure no problem, but banning before then is unjustified as I literally did nothing wrong.

Thank you.

People leave because they've lost, like you do in every single pvp game, they don't leave because they want to punish the opponent by not giving them a coin. How many coins other players have is completely irrelevant, you think Futz cares how many coins I have? Or how many times people DC on me, absolutely not. See - https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=43709 Are you suggesting every single person who dc's, 99% of which will be on purpose btw is toxic and should be banned? Like I said, had it been a stated rule, I would have never left any game, but it's simply not the case, I wasn't doing anything against current rules. Maybe the GM should have said to me, "Hi! If you continue to DC will we have to ban you," and adjusted the PVP rules, I would have stopped. But instead 5 days for nothing, no warning for breaking non existent rules just a straight ban. I also asked Shane ingame if it were bannable and he said no, too bad I didn't think this would be an issue and didn't screen shot.

It's not a glitch, it's intentional design because Shane believes it could be abused if you did get a coin from dcing, doesn't really make sense to me because you can abuse rating in the exact same manor currently and get 500 at the end of season, but out of our hands. It's not toxic behaviour though, if it were a rule, I would never have dcd, but because it's not breaking any rules, I saved myself time and requeued. Something that has been acceptable practice every season before this. I'm sure you have done it many many times too, are you toxic aswell? It was 2 days ago, the day of the update. I have no idea about this issue at that moment, you PM-ed me and we done with it right ^^ Here you are admitting that you dcd on purpose, you should be punished too then. You have such a victim mentality, EVERYONE is losing coins because of this, not just you, but other than being told to wait for an automated battle to take over, there has been no other information on it and certainly no addition to the rules saying its bannable anywhere. If it were a rule people would stop doing it but its not. Completely out of line.

Re: D/Cing Is Bannable Offence <r><QUOTE author="Kagawa"><s> </e></QUOTE> I got banned for it. <br/> <br/> Can you please show me where it was said before this post that it was reportable? Because that is the first time i've seen it.</r>

Start taking SS and reporting boys, you can get banned for it.

anyone who uses slowbro and talonflame get no love from me

nah, remove tangrowth, sableye, slowbro, blissey and milotic first

we did it boys

it did 1-2%

I'm aware, but it's just not the case. An attack that should have done on calcs 49-58% damage to Conk, did 1-2% damage on him. Can you explain that? I had it screen shotted, but I'm retarded and when I edited the first ss I copied over the second screenshot. Conk is definitely bugged.