Bankai17 Posted July 18, 2023 Author Share Posted July 18, 2023 On 7/14/2023 at 9:33 AM, Zoruami said: Greetings, Since he made a complain (which it's totally fine, has his rights to not agree and try to explain his side), I suggest to both to put on hold this auction until he receives a reply to his topic. Once the decision is set, then based on it, you will know what to do. Therefore, for now, you dont do anything @Bankai17 just keep the Medicham in your possession and DO NOT trade it away by any means! And @Laviter please always keep 4M in your account until this situation is solved. Kind Regards, * Zoruami * Hello? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laviter Posted July 18, 2023 Share Posted July 18, 2023 Staffs will not forget about this problem. We need to wait their decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eon Posted July 23, 2023 Share Posted July 23, 2023 Apologies for the delay on the resolution of this auction. Both auctioneer and bidder have made mistakes in this case: @Laviter There was a 4 minute gap between the starting offer being publicly announced as 4m, and your post to start. It wasn't just one or two minutes. This time gap is too wide for me to think you've been caught off guard. @Bankai17 You've lent this Medicham for 10 days to another player while the auction was ongoing. It's common sense that the Pokemon must be available to be traded by the time the auction ends. Because the Pokemon isn't available to be traded, and the bidder allegedly didn't have the intention to bid 4m on it, this auction is void. Let this be a lesson for you both to learn in future auctions, avoid inconvenience for other players and actions taken to your accounts accordingly. Take care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts