Balladeer

Dear @Hieubii, @Joksch96 As there was no response received from @Hieubii within the given timeframe, the matter has been reviewed and processed in accordance with the Trade and Auction Rules as mentioned. The force trade has been completed, finalizing the transaction between both parties. This case is now considered resolved and closed. Dear @Hieubii, This serves as an official warning regarding the mishandling of this recent auction thread. You have failed to respond within the given timeframe and did not provide clarification for the following:| 1. Incorrect posting under Cross Server while shifting transfer responsibility to the buyer, which contradicts Cross Server Forum Rule 2. 2. Announcing a winner before the required 48-hour duration was completed, which contradicts Auction Rules. 3. Acknowledging a bid after the auction window had ended, which violates the Auction Rules. As a result, a force trade was carried out to finalize the transaction in accordance with the rules. Please ensure that in all future auctions: The auction duration and endpoint are strictly followed. If posting under Cross Server, you as the seller must be ready to transfer unless an explicit agreement states otherwise. No bids are accepted or acknowledged after closure. Failure to comply in future cases may result in stricter disciplinary action. Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Joksch96, You may stay in your preferred server. The pokemon is to be force trade to you later. Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Hieubii, This is a follow-up regarding the inquiries raised in my previous message concerning your auction thread. Kindly provide your response within the next 24 hours to address the points mentioned above. Failure to do so will result in me proceeding accordingly as per the established Trade and Auction Rules. Dear @Joksch96, Regardless of the above, please be informed that I will proceed with the force trade accordingly after the given timeframe. This message serves as your acknowledgment of the process moving forward. Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Katowiczanin, Thanks for the clarification, I have also edited the auction post slightly, please proceed with the auction and follow the start point, end point and Auction Rules. Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Katowiczanin, The auction description does not clearly specify the intended starting point. Based on the limited information provided, I would like to confirm whether you intend for each Pokémon’s auction to begin from the first starting bid, or if all are to follow the start time stated in the auction post. Kindly clarify this so this auction can proceed accordingly. Kindly also refer to the Auction Rules. Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Lamola, @Yayozama Upon reviewing the final bid amounts from both, no further action will be taken. As noted by @Lamola, the bid placed by @Six06 is considered invalid since it matched the same amount of 1.6m previously bidded by @Yayozama - therefore, @Yayozama's bid stands as the highest valid one. Apologies for the brief confusion earlier. That said, this auction will still be marked as mishandled due to the premature closure. However, no additional action is required from any party at this point. Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Lamola Thank you for the prompt follow-up. Kindly note that this auction is considered mishandled, as the early closure has affected the outcome and potential follow-up bids. However, this will be treated as a warning and a reminder to always double-check the auction start time, end time, and bidding timestamps before announcing closure or proceeding with a trade - even if it requires an additional 1–2 days to finalize. Doing so will help prevent similar situations in the future. Dear @Yayozama, @Six06, As the auction outcome has been affected by the early closure, I would like to know what resolution both of you are seeking so we can proceed accordingly and ensure fairness in the final decision. I would like to hear both of your thoughts before further action. Ignore the above crossed-comment, read my following reply. Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Lamola, @Yayozama, @Six06 I will be using GMT+8 for the following.: The auction for the Ursaluna mount was started by @Yayozama on 25th October 2025 at 10:06 AM (GMT+8). Based on the stated duration, the auction should have ended on 26th October 2025 at 10:06 PM (GMT+8). That makes @Six06 bid at 12:21 PM (within the auction window) the highest valid bid prior to the scheduled endpoint. However, @Lamola, you closed this auction early, changed the title and did not include a screenshot of the completed trade in the thread. Please provide an explanation and submit the trade screenshot (or other supporting evidence) for review within the next 24 hours so this matter can be resolved transparently. Until @Lamola provides the requested evidence and explanation, the highest valid bid remains @Six06 12:21 PM (GMT+8). If no valid proof or explanation is provided, further moderator action may follow. Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Epicmon, There is no Mudkip included in this auction post; therefore, I have updated the title accordingly. Please be mindful in the future, as incorrect or misleading titles can cause confusion and subject for further attention/action. Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Aldosan, This is clear message for you, you should avoid making similar mistakes in future auctions. Appropriate disciplinary actions have been taken. As per Auction Rules: Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Aldosan, @Grahamsitox, @Yeda, I'm using GMT+8 as the standard for the following. Upon review of the auction, the first valid bid was placed by @Faizu on 22nd October 2025 at 6:23 AM (GMT+8), which sets the official endpoint at 24th October 2025 at 6:23 AM (GMT+8) based on the stated 48-hour duration. The highest valid bid prior to that time was @Grahamsitox with 9m, placed on 23rd October 2025 at 3:29 AM (GMT+8), making this the highest valid bid according to the Auction Rules. However, @Aldosan's closure post was made at 24th October 2025, 3:43 AM (GMT+8), before the 24th October 2025 at 6:23 AM (GMT+8) endpoint. Auction closed 2hr 40 min before the actual end. Hence, @Aldosan, you have closed this auction prematurely which may have affected the other possible end results of this auction, however, the highest valid bid remains, @Grahamsitox with 9m. Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Alucardarren, Please be reminded to familiarize yourself more thoroughly with the Auction Rules as the Auction Host/Seller. You should not acknowledge or accept any bids after the highest valid bid has been placed within the 24-hour valid bidding window. Fortunately, you have completed the trade with the rightful winner, @Bajiruu which resolves the issue in this instance. However, please be more cautious and mindful in future auctions to prevent similar mistakes. Should you require any clarification or support, feel free to reach out to the Trade Moderator Team for assistance. Dear @Namanh, It has been noted that this is not your first instance of posting a bid after an auction has officially ended. Please be advised not to repeat this behaviour, as it disrupts the integrity of the auction process. Further infractions will result in appropriate disciplinary measures, as this repeated conduct is considered baiting auction hosts into breaking auction rules. Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Hieubii, I am reviewing this auction thread, kindly clarify the following points: 1. Why was this posted in Cross Server while stating “This is a Gold Server auction”? Per the Cross Server rules: In your post, you wrote: “This is a Gold Server auction. If bidding from an alternative server, state that you will transfer upon winning.” - which directly contradicts the above rule. When listing under Selling Pokemon - Cross Server, the expectation is that you, as the seller, are prepared to transfer the Pokémon if the winning bidder is from another server. Your statement instead shifts that responsibility to the buyer. Please clarify your intent for posting under Selling Pokemon - Cross Server despite this contradiction, and explain whether you were prepared to transfer the Pokémon yourself. 2. Why was a winner announced before the stipulated 48-hour period ended? The first bid by @Joksch96 was placed at 21/10/2025, 7:33 PM (GMT+8). Your announcement of a winner was at 23/10/2025, 6:29 PM (GMT+8), which is 1 hour and 4 minutes earlier than the required 48 hours from the initiating bid. Kindly explain why the auction was closed early despite the above. 3. Why was the 300k bid from @Yumeko77 acknowledged when the auction was already considered over? At the time you acknowledged the 300k bid, the auction window had already elapsed. Please explain the rationale for accepting or acknowledging that bid as it directly contradicts the Auction Rules. Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Nuclearpotato, As noted by others, once an auction has been initiated by the first bid, you are not permitted to change its end time or endpoint. This serves as a reminder to avoid repeating similar mistakes in the future and ensure proper adherence to the Auction Rules. "8. End point must be clearly stated before the auction has started. This cannot be changed once the auction has begun." Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Srkhan, You may refer to the following auction rules for further: https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/topic/119709-forums-and-in-game-auction-rules/ As for "noted", we generally don't practice this since it will also bump the auction thread, refrain from over-bumping in the future. The bids by default are acknowledged and cannot be withdrawn once placed.