Balladeer

Dear @Suzu1, I have moved this auction to the appropriate Trade Forum "Shiny and Special Pokémon - Cross Server" as per request. Many thanks for reaching out and all the best. Best Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Envymeister and @Agate, I have assisted with the force trade accordingly. Cheers for the New Year Should there be any further inquiries, kindly feel free to revert. This auction is now considered completed. Best Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Soares1, I have assisted in moving the Auction to Coin & Items - Silver as per request. All the best and happy holidays Best Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Soares1, After further investigation on Dragon57, kindly be informed that the case falls under False Buying as per Trade Rules. Due to privacy and moderation policy, I will not disclose further details. Please rest assured that appropriate action has been taken to address this issue. Thank you for your understanding and kindly resume as per normal. Best Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Envym3, Thanks for the prompt reply with screenshot. Kindly proceed with the auction as per usual. Best Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Richieamg, Thanks for the prompt reply with the screenshot. Kindly proceed with the auction as per usual. Best Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Envym3 Kindly refrain from overbumping your auction post. Please note that there must be a minimum gap of 24 hours between each bump. Additionally, please provide a screenshot as evidence of the alleged Garuk - 2.1m bid, as there is currently no visible proof of this offer being posted by another user. Failure to provide evidence may result in this being considered null bid, kindly refer to the Auction Rules. Best Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Onthepath, As per request, I shall lock this auction post, considered as close. Best Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Ovanke, As the auction is considered for closing as noted, I will proceed to instead, lock this post accordingly. Should you wish to repost, please do so under Shiny and Special Pokémon – Silver / Gold / Cross-Server, as appropriate. Best Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Onthepath, As noted by @Grahamsitox, you, as the auction host, are not permitted to start your own auction. Doing so would be considered a fake start if the auction is initiated by the host. Kindly refrain from doing so in future posts. Auction Rules: https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/topic/119709-forums-and-in-game-auction-rules/ Best Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Richieamg, Kindly refrain from overbumping your auction post. Please note that there must be a minimum gap of 24 hours between each bump. Additionally, please provide a screenshot as evidence of the alleged 5m bid, as there is currently no visible proof of this offer being posted by another user. Failure to provide evidence may result in this being considered a false bid, which is against the Auction Rules. Best Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Lacomus, @Sumocal, @Jmun, It appears the trade has not been completed yet due to server transfers being disabled at this time. Nonetheless, please keep each other updated, and remember to post a screenshot of the successful trade here once it has been completed. Best Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Garcome, @Gipxo Noted that both of you have proceeded with the transfer, which is good. However, @Garcome, kindly post the screenshot of your successful trades here in this thread so that it can be properly completed in accordance with Auction Rule 4. Best Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Gal1leo and @Boomsmoke, I have forced traded the Halloween Mimikyu and Pokedollars accordingly. Best Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Hieubii, @Joksch96 As there was no response received from @Hieubii within the given timeframe, the matter has been reviewed and processed in accordance with the Trade and Auction Rules as mentioned. The force trade has been completed, finalizing the transaction between both parties. This case is now considered resolved and closed. Dear @Hieubii, This serves as an official warning regarding the mishandling of this recent auction thread. You have failed to respond within the given timeframe and did not provide clarification for the following:| 1. Incorrect posting under Cross Server while shifting transfer responsibility to the buyer, which contradicts Cross Server Forum Rule 2. 2. Announcing a winner before the required 48-hour duration was completed, which contradicts Auction Rules. 3. Acknowledging a bid after the auction window had ended, which violates the Auction Rules. As a result, a force trade was carried out to finalize the transaction in accordance with the rules. Please ensure that in all future auctions: The auction duration and endpoint are strictly followed. If posting under Cross Server, you as the seller must be ready to transfer unless an explicit agreement states otherwise. No bids are accepted or acknowledged after closure. Failure to comply in future cases may result in stricter disciplinary action. Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Joksch96, You may stay in your preferred server. The pokemon is to be force trade to you later. Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Hieubii, This is a follow-up regarding the inquiries raised in my previous message concerning your auction thread. Kindly provide your response within the next 24 hours to address the points mentioned above. Failure to do so will result in me proceeding accordingly as per the established Trade and Auction Rules. Dear @Joksch96, Regardless of the above, please be informed that I will proceed with the force trade accordingly after the given timeframe. This message serves as your acknowledgment of the process moving forward. Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Katowiczanin, Thanks for the clarification, I have also edited the auction post slightly, please proceed with the auction and follow the start point, end point and Auction Rules. Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Katowiczanin, The auction description does not clearly specify the intended starting point. Based on the limited information provided, I would like to confirm whether you intend for each Pokémon’s auction to begin from the first starting bid, or if all are to follow the start time stated in the auction post. Kindly clarify this so this auction can proceed accordingly. Kindly also refer to the Auction Rules. Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Lamola, @Yayozama Upon reviewing the final bid amounts from both, no further action will be taken. As noted by @Lamola, the bid placed by @Six06 is considered invalid since it matched the same amount of 1.6m previously bidded by @Yayozama - therefore, @Yayozama's bid stands as the highest valid one. Apologies for the brief confusion earlier. That said, this auction will still be marked as mishandled due to the premature closure. However, no additional action is required from any party at this point. Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Lamola Thank you for the prompt follow-up. Kindly note that this auction is considered mishandled, as the early closure has affected the outcome and potential follow-up bids. However, this will be treated as a warning and a reminder to always double-check the auction start time, end time, and bidding timestamps before announcing closure or proceeding with a trade - even if it requires an additional 1–2 days to finalize. Doing so will help prevent similar situations in the future. Dear @Yayozama, @Six06, As the auction outcome has been affected by the early closure, I would like to know what resolution both of you are seeking so we can proceed accordingly and ensure fairness in the final decision. I would like to hear both of your thoughts before further action. Ignore the above crossed-comment, read my following reply. Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Lamola, @Yayozama, @Six06 I will be using GMT+8 for the following.: The auction for the Ursaluna mount was started by @Yayozama on 25th October 2025 at 10:06 AM (GMT+8). Based on the stated duration, the auction should have ended on 26th October 2025 at 10:06 PM (GMT+8). That makes @Six06 bid at 12:21 PM (within the auction window) the highest valid bid prior to the scheduled endpoint. However, @Lamola, you closed this auction early, changed the title and did not include a screenshot of the completed trade in the thread. Please provide an explanation and submit the trade screenshot (or other supporting evidence) for review within the next 24 hours so this matter can be resolved transparently. Until @Lamola provides the requested evidence and explanation, the highest valid bid remains @Six06 12:21 PM (GMT+8). If no valid proof or explanation is provided, further moderator action may follow. Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Epicmon, There is no Mudkip included in this auction post; therefore, I have updated the title accordingly. Please be mindful in the future, as incorrect or misleading titles can cause confusion and subject for further attention/action. Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Aldosan, This is clear message for you, you should avoid making similar mistakes in future auctions. Appropriate disciplinary actions have been taken. As per Auction Rules: Regards, Balladeer

Dear @Aldosan, @Grahamsitox, @Yeda, I'm using GMT+8 as the standard for the following. Upon review of the auction, the first valid bid was placed by @Faizu on 22nd October 2025 at 6:23 AM (GMT+8), which sets the official endpoint at 24th October 2025 at 6:23 AM (GMT+8) based on the stated 48-hour duration. The highest valid bid prior to that time was @Grahamsitox with 9m, placed on 23rd October 2025 at 3:29 AM (GMT+8), making this the highest valid bid according to the Auction Rules. However, @Aldosan's closure post was made at 24th October 2025, 3:43 AM (GMT+8), before the 24th October 2025 at 6:23 AM (GMT+8) endpoint. Auction closed 2hr 40 min before the actual end. Hence, @Aldosan, you have closed this auction prematurely which may have affected the other possible end results of this auction, however, the highest valid bid remains, @Grahamsitox with 9m. Regards, Balladeer