-
Posts
344 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Everything posted by Gracee
-
700k
-
wtb the impish rough skin garchmop 31 speed
-
Auction : h.a careful Gligar 31/31/30
Gracee replied to Seller001's topic in Selling Pokémon - Silver
is it over or if not 1.8m -
SELL FORM EASTER MAWILE EPIC TRICKROOM XD
Gracee replied to Xihoi22222's topic in Shiny and Special Pokémon - Silver
6m -
let me break down the c.o for everything c.o metang 300k by Gracee c.o marowak 300k by Gracee c.o gliscro 200k by Gracee c.o mimi 200k by Gracee c.o Bunnelby 250k by Gracee
-
raise all 50k , hope this wont make confusion @Kenshinv please break down each mon c.o
-
raise all 50k
-
Shiny Koraidon Mount Auction (Very Rare PVP Chest Reward)
Gracee replied to Mrgung1's topic in Coins & Items - Gold
3.1m will transfer if win -
@Antizheng i can be online rn
-
shiny buneary Jolly (28 SPD) - PVP Usable
Gracee replied to Sinnohash's topic in Shiny and Special Pokémon - Gold
1.2m -
1.8m
-
shiny buneary Jolly (28 SPD) - PVP Usable
Gracee replied to Sinnohash's topic in Shiny and Special Pokémon - Gold
start -
@Aristurtles u need to provide proper evidence of the bid placed ingame as ss , those bids are invalid, still c.o is 1.3m by @Twistie
-
Halloween Pvpable Noivern/Slaking
Gracee replied to Smurf378's topic in Shiny and Special Pokémon - Gold
600k kong -
Auction : h.a careful Gligar 31/31/30
Gracee replied to Seller001's topic in Selling Pokémon - Silver
1.5m -
@Antizheng heyy lemme know when u can be online , and please mention with the @ tho i didn't get a notification of winning the auction & for now i am also mentioning @Shellos to pick up her lopunny
-
Shiny Venusaur+Hw Venusaur+Xmas Venusaur Bundle
Gracee replied to Yuqi05's topic in Shiny and Special Pokémon - Cross Server
1m -
@Drakloak Sorry to interupt the flow but i got something to say on the behalf of @Qwertyqwerty08 The Bid of "1.2m" was clearly understood by all participants to refer to tangrowth because: The active bidding war at that moment was only for Tangrowth Previous bids were already shortened " 900k tang", "1m tang" , "1.1m tang" The auctioneer did not reject or question it, and another participants immediately continued with bidding with 1.3m tang, clearly shows that meaning of 1.2m bid was understood Rules requiring accurate bids are intended to prevent confusion during the auction itself. In this case, no confusion occurred, the auction continued normally, and all participants acted as though the bid was valid in real time. If the bid was genuinely considered invalid, the correct procedure would have been to stop and reject it immediately before further bids occurred. I don't have a personal problem with the outcome or any other player but its just unfair for the player who have participated in the auction thinking their bid is valid i am just curious what would the staff do in this situation or just follow the original trade rules Thankyouu (Again no offence) Gracee
-
start sneasel