Darksun20 Posted September 22, 2018 Share Posted September 22, 2018 Why are they only limited to one use? I rarely use hatchet as I just commute through subway and boat, rarely do I ever go into routes and have to use the axe. And pickaxe has a very niche use that isn't very rewarding in the long run. I feel like they could have more bang for their buck since you have to pay a lump sum of cash in game or rl money for. My suggestions: Make dig spots mineable with pickaxe, and make grassy areas able to be cut like in main games or a simpler way to headbutt trees with the hatchet. To be honest couldn't think of another use for the hatchet that's worth it but it may be just fine on it's own. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olker Posted September 23, 2018 Share Posted September 23, 2018 +1 Specially the digging with pick axe part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robtheslob Posted September 23, 2018 Share Posted September 23, 2018 Makes sense that hitting a tree with a hatchet would cause the same effect as a headbutt honestly. Pickaxe already has a second function which is used to break a special rock in excavations. Perhaps there should be special area the hatchet could play a part in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purplemauth Posted September 24, 2018 Share Posted September 24, 2018 (edited) Dig will likely not be usable via item since it requires a pokemon with 150+ happiness to use. Likewise with headbutt. If you were able to just get the tools from the store and bypass the happiness requirements, that'd be verging on unfair in my opinion. Edited September 24, 2018 by PurpleMauth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robtheslob Posted September 25, 2018 Share Posted September 25, 2018 Dig will likely not be usable via item since it requires a pokemon with 150+ happiness to use. Likewise with headbutt. If you were able to just get the tools from the store and bypass the happiness requirements, that'd be verging on unfair in my opinion. Paying 5$ to bypass a requirement that takes 10 minutes and zero effort to accomplish is unfair? K. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olker Posted September 25, 2018 Share Posted September 25, 2018 Paying 5$ to bypass a requirement that takes 10 minutes and zero effort to accomplish is unfair? K. 5$ or 150k. Imo, ot's a fair trade, although it may sound a bit pay to win, when you are an experienced player, 150k is nothing, so it's fair me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now