The game should automatically enforce sleep clause.

Re: Enforing autmatically sleep clause

 

<t>Yeah that requires engine rework Im guessing since nature cure doesnt activate until switch in, also using rest while holding lum berry the lum berry doesnt activate until you use a move. Gotta pay close attention while pvping. If you do put 2 pokemon asleep just pm them say sorry and ff the match</t>

Re: Enforing autmatically sleep clause

 

<t>It would be great but mb hard to do, i have a different suggestion, more like a sleep status reminder to prevent ppl from sleeping an another pokemon.</t>

The sleepclause is more than just simple "putting two pokemon to sleep", for example spore breloom with effectspore, any other pokemon with effect spore OR natural cure blissey, any other natural cure pokemon and so on

360635 The sleepclause is more than just simple "putting two pokemon to sleep", for example spore breloom with effectspore, any other pokemon with effect spore OR natural cure blissey, any other natural cure pokemon and so on

Coding the clause around effect spore is actually the only problem. Rest is a special type of sleep since it's defined with two sleep turns so there is a chance u get the information if it's rest induced. NC would be fine if it heals when switching out and we know it's working so it's ether only a visual bug or just some spaghetti code.

Tbh it would be fine for me if u cant put a poke to sleep with a move if there is already a pokemon sleeping induced by a move or effect spore. Effect spore as an ability should still work. Would be 100 times better than the current state.

360641 Tbh it would be fine for me if u cant put a poke to sleep with a move if there is already a pokemon sleeping induced by a move or effect spore. Effect spore as an ability should still work. Would be 100 times better than the current state.

 

It is allowed if it wasn't done by spore afaik

360646

360641 Tbh it would be fine for me if u cant put a poke to sleep with a move if there is already a pokemon sleeping induced by a move or effect spore. Effect spore as an ability should still work. Would be 100 times better than the current state.

 

It is allowed if it wasn't done by spore afaik

The problem is the other way around the current rule allows u to put another pokemon to sleep with a move if the current sleep status is induced by the ability effect spore. That case is not that easy to cover. But i doubt that most players would be bothered by that

360649 The problem is the other way around the current rule allows u to put another pokemon to sleep with a move if the current sleep status is induced by the ability effect spore. That case is not that easy to cover. But i doubt that most players would be bothered by that

 

I think it is covered, SLP caused by effect spore is not included in the sleep clause iirc

360650

360649 The problem is the other way around the current rule allows u to put another pokemon to sleep with a move if the current sleep status is induced by the ability effect spore. That case is not that easy to cover. But i doubt that most players would be bothered by that

 

I think it is covered, SLP caused by effect spore is not included in the sleep clause iirc

that's not what i ment. An automated system wont be able to differentiate between sleep induced by effect spore and sleep induced by a move (except rest) because there is no difference in how they work. So u need additional algorithms/variabls to cover that. An easier/faster solution is possible if u change the sleep clause a little bit.

360665

360650

360649 The problem is the other way around the current rule allows u to put another pokemon to sleep with a move if the current sleep status is induced by the ability effect spore. That case is not that easy to cover. But i doubt that most players would be bothered by that

 

I think it is covered, SLP caused by effect spore is not included in the sleep clause iirc

that's not what i ment. An automated system wont be able to differentiate between sleep induced by effect spore and sleep induced by a move (except rest) because there is no difference in how they work. So u need additional algorithms/variabls to cover that. An easier/faster solution is possible if u change the sleep clause a little bit.

 

oh yeah you are right