-
Posts
349 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Gio
-
Lowered s.o, added insta
-
Starting offer is 1.5m The minimum raise is 100k The auction will run for 72h after the first bid Insta is 6m (Leftovers included for free)
-
Personally, I would like the change to be reverted. But, if something is to change, I think a money sink would be the best solution. Some money sink ideas could be: 1. A better casino. Like the old casino, but with better rewards. The current casino doesn't seem worth it, but I haven't tried it so I can't really opine. 2. A secret/player base. This could be a spot to chill with friends. There could be decorations buyable with pokedollars to make each base unique. 3. Exchange pokedollars for PvE coins. This one could possibly have some bad repercussions but they could be worked around or just briefly tested and then removed if it doesn't work. 4. More cosmetics buyable with pokedollars. There are already lots of cosmetic shops in game, but better and/or more cosmetics would be nice. 5. An island with only rare spawns. This could be a sailor that you pay X amount of money to access the island. 6. An area with higher level pokemon than anywhere else. Similar to the previous one, you would pay X amount of money to access this area. Aside from the money sink, there are other options. Limiting content should never be one of them.
-
They have the same ID. They are completely identical aside from the amount of PP on the moves.
-
Logged in and got a notification saying some lent Pokémon had returned, which struck me as really odd because lending is currently disabled. I went to check which Pokémon had returned and it was a Slowbro and a Klefki. I only have one of each and I had been using them earlier today so i was really confused. Once i clicked them to check them out, I thought they looked exactly like the ones I normally use. I searched my pc for them and found 2 of each, identical. I'm willing to release them if that's all it takes. Not sure if its happened to other players as well, figured I'd make a report on it.
-
could you pm me on discord or give me your discord tag?
-
discord tag pls :)
-
Yes, I’ll pm you in discord
-
Could you pm me in discord or give your discord name?
-
someone bought it first sorry :c
-
Welcome to Silvernabs Guild Shop!! Discord is the fastest and easiest way to contact us for buying or price negotiations, but in-game works as well. The contacts for the shop are: Gio / just.gio. Schitzngigs Tempo420 Cash Coin capsules (500k) IV Rerolls (500k) Nature Rerolls (250k) 1. Be respectful. 2. No reservations. 3. No fake offers. 4. Keep in mind that this shop only for SILVER server. 5. If there are several of the same Pokémon, use format "pokemon#number" for buying. (e.g. Snorlax#1) 6. Prices are negotiable. THANKS FOR YOUR TIME, HAVE A GOOD DAY!
-
Xmas Munchlax (Adam-Good Ivs) sold 4.1m {can close}
Gio replied to H037's topic in Shiny and Special Pokémon - Silver
Ready now :D -
Xmas Munchlax (Adam-Good Ivs) sold 4.1m {can close}
Gio replied to H037's topic in Shiny and Special Pokémon - Silver
3.5m + 1 iv reroll -
Xmas Munchlax (Adam-Good Ivs) sold 4.1m {can close}
Gio replied to H037's topic in Shiny and Special Pokémon - Silver
3.5m -
Xmas Munchlax (Adam-Good Ivs) sold 4.1m {can close}
Gio replied to H037's topic in Shiny and Special Pokémon - Silver
2.5m -
WTS EPIC BOLD REGEN 20+ AUDINO (SOLD,CAN BE CLOSE)
Gio replied to Nagisahime's topic in Selling Pokémon - Silver
1.7m -
Well, thanks shino for such an eloquent and thorough response. Sorry for the late reply but I didn’t notice you had replied until Madtrainer informed me and I wasn't home. I too am sorry because this will also be a long post. I want to preface this by saying that, like I said in my first comment, I have no issues with the rules. My problem is how they are enforced. Just wanted to clear that up if someone was confused. This isn’t what I’m arguing about. If someone breaks the rules, then fine mute them. My issue is what constitutes a rule being broken and what is the correct punishment that needs to be given if any should be given at all. For example, my friend was once muted for saying “hi” in help chat. He broke the rules, that's clear. But why did a mute need to happen? If the conversation had continued then I would understand a mute. But just saying “hi” to someone and getting muted is very unfair. You might argue that no matter what, it broke the rules and there are no exceptions, which is true, but it doesn’t make it fair nor just. That is just wrong, in almost every warning I see, it goes “x please don’t do that” or “y keep the chat on topic” which is clearly targeting them. Additionally, not wanting to flood the chat is great, I don’t want that either. However, I have witnessed for myself a certain mod, who’s name I won’t mention, send the same message several times in a couple minutes. Repeatedly. My suggestion wasn’t for a mod to do that, it was for a mod to pm the player to stop what they’re doing or whatever the infraction was. That would be a much better system imo. We’ll stick with the example I gave. It’s not about being “allowed” to do that, it’s about people making mistakes. I, for one, have made that same mistake in help chat. It’s easy to make that mistake and I don’t think it should be a big deal. People don’t get on trade chat to have a conversation, that’s painfully clear. So I fail to see why that needs a warning. It makes players roll their eyes, it’s so useless to do that. I think that doing these warning only creates resentment and hate for mods. I’ll be honest, when I see warnings that shouldn’t be made, I gets me annoyed because it feels like players aren’t allowed to make mistakes. I’ll give you another example, someone types “wts x pokemon” in help chat and then follows it up with “oh sorry wrong chat”. That’s a clear mistake and he apologized. A little bit later, a certain mod tells them to use the proper channel. Several people respond with “wut” or “lol” because it’s so annoying that it’s laughable. The whole chat filter thing is not something I really care about. I completely agree with you. It was just something that I see a lot of players question, so I decided to mention it. Ok, so you say you take feedback, but not once did I see, in this thread, a mod admit or even acknowledge the possibility that a player might be right about something, mods are always right. “Valid feedback” is totally fair, I hate when players complain about bans and spawn rates or any other thing that isn’t useful to a conversation. With this topic, I can’t say much because I don’t know the full scope of a mods duties. Also I spend my time in help chat and might not see if they are active in another chat. My main concern would be how much time they can put in the game. There have been hundreds of times when I wish there was a mod present and there isn’t. As you have said, there are irl things that can prevent them from putting in more time, which is why I think those should be removed. A mod should be able to put in a lot of time in game. Either that or recruit more so that there’s always at least one online. But maybe that’s too much to ask. I understand that mods have different duties and I don’t mind that at all. My new suggestion is to make a completely new role to help players with anything. I believe this would alleviate mod duties and strengthen the bond between staff and players. This would work like a tmod, but for help chat I guess. Just a thought though. You say you take complaints seriously, but I still remember when several players complained about a certain mod, and nothing happened. We were essentially told to suck it up. So from personally experience I can’t believe this. You’re right, players do still dislike mods for the old rules and it’s not fair for the newer mods. And players don’t believe mods anymore and they don’t feel like they are heard. I say this because most of my friends, who have played way longer than me, won’t even make a post here because they have given up hope of change. I do agree that Mods get a lot of hate from past mistakes and it’s unfair. However, the new ones don’t do much to make that stigma go away. But, I will try to have more faith in these new mods because they haven't done anything yet. In regards to the voting system I suggested, you’re points are completely true and I agree with them. Especially with the favoritism point. So instead, I will suggest that system for apps. So the players will vote on someone to be an app and then staff will decide if he is good or not. Of course the player would have to agree to be one to begin with. I do remember our conversations and I believe you and me can have a constructive and healthy debate of our ideas for pro. You are one of the few mods I actually like. As for the rules, I enjoyed the changes quite a lot. You did tell me that there was a lot of discussion about them and then there was the changes so I don’t doubt what you say. I'm glad that there will be changes, even if they are bad ones, I'm content with trying them out. Thanks you for your time and i hope we can continue this conversation.
-
Could I get a proper reply to my first comment? From actual staff.