Bash

wts shedinja halo 4m

.

+1

I'm not sure about the usefulness of this topic in its current form. Like, it is for sure useful in some way, but I wonder if the effort was worth it if is stays like this. Especially since you mention new players as a audience. I currently see it as a tier list where PvP affine people can philosophize with each other about which set may be a tiny better than a other. This may sound harsher than it is meant to be, I just want to sctrictly point that out because you also have nowhere mentioned that this topic is not finished/in work and I personally am worried about the future of this topic in the way it is right now. I try to show why I see it this way. Do you like my S tier Magic Guard Calm Mind set? For a beginner, most of the set details are not clear. The explanations are missing. The sets are not usefull if not build in the right surroundings, you mention that. But how do I know the right build for my Pokémon? If this is something every newbie should answer for themself, then the topic is needless in begin with. They would (have to) come to conclusions on their own anyway. Perhaps someone could argue the same way at the viability list, but I think that one is at least more 'general' and can be excused in this way. I'd wish for set details with examples like in the Smogon dex. Maybe also a hint for the nature of the Pokémon, like "Bold prefered" or "Common natures: Bold" In this way you know at least which exact sets are meant, and have a more fundemental base to think about what the weaknesses of this set/s may be and why you'd prefer move A over move B in the same All-out Attacker set. ---------------- I think the most common set in PRO is: Diancie-Mega @ Diancite Ability: Magic Bounce - Protect - Stealth Rock - Diamond Storm - Moonblast and should be added. I think you mean a different set with 'All out', do you?

700k

a

a

Hi, I start.

.

.

.

The topic started okay, you invested much time in your post, were respectful and tried to explain your point of view in order to improve the game. I think thats something very respectable. I think you were proven wrong in most of your claims, not saying that some stuff might be true. The more replies you add here, the more ridiculous it becomes tho. You claim something, without any argument or prove, you get proven wrong with a solid argumentation and you reply with "Yes, you may be right, but x, y and z" again without any prove and rather weak argumentation on x, y and z. If you want to be taken serious, please spend some time in proving your argumentation and make some valid points. The way you do it right now is pointless. You not only waste your time and the time off people who actually try to take everything you say serious and aim for an actuall conversation, you also kinda spit them in the face by saying they should prove you wrong while you dont prove much of what you say in first place. Lets take your PvP paragraph as example to prove my point. I know it was already replied to by different people, but I wanna show you what people wish to hear when they get feedback. And in the end of all that, there may still be people who see things different.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Very cool. Is it known how much better a enhanced PvP chest is compared to a normal one?

bid now, regret later!

13 is 31 just the other way around

Start 1m Min raise 100k Startes once first offer was made 48 hour duration. Accept cc 500k or money or combined HP bug!

Serious categories Friendliest: Behoni Wittiest: Its PRO Funniest: Fafouney Most helpful: Norex Most intriguing: Norex2 Favorite guide maker: Belzebel (Especially the unban guide) Favorite guild: Trinity Best discussion sparker: Prehax For fun categories Favorite staff member: Not Patchnotes Player who says they're retiring but not retiring yet: Black Favorite PRO Pokemon form: Recently I fell in love with Summer Fennekin. Favorite Pokemon: Too many.

Please contact me on Discord: bash._.

Please contact me on Discord: bash._.