Jump to content

Recommended Posts

appreciate the current rules but they are rarely updated.

I suggest rather than permanent ban , Long term ban (like1yr,2yr , 3 year..) should be applied on the guilty /suspected.If a person return after such a long time it means he may have learnt from his/her past and might not committ any mistake/crime in future. We can correct wrong persons and get good people out of criminals.

 

Link to comment
https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/topic/237230-perm-ban-anternative/
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rizul said:

appreciate the current rules but they are rarely updated.

I suggest rather than permanent ban , Long term ban (like1yr,2yr , 3 year..) should be applied on the guilty /suspected.If a person return after such a long time it means he may have learnt from his/her past and might not committ any mistake/crime in future. We can correct wrong persons and get good people out of criminals.

 

Should be 999 year for bots/cheat/hacks/macro, let them learn a bit before comeback

___________________________________________________________________________________

 

image.jpeg.e982d2b7e278b3b1d88369a70572e0d1.jpeg

 

___________________________________________________________________________________

Posted (edited)
Quote

If a person return after such a long time it means he may have learnt from his/her past and might not committ any mistake/crime in future.

Not really to be honest. I have seen players who joined back after a good amount of time then they resort to their previous actions again. And I think the current rules are good enough and the action and punishment policy is justified. I am free right now so, I will take my time to explain to the best of knowledge 


 

Quote

We can correct wrong persons and get good people out of criminals.

We already have an existing Appeal Process:
Staff already provide ample opportunities for banned users to appeal their bans. This process ensures that each case is reviewed carefully, and those who genuinely regret their actions and demonstrate a willingness to change are given a chance to return. and those punishments also depends on various factors as well. for example, severity of offenses, repeat offenders etc. 

Severity of Offenses:
There should be no leniency towards those who engage in serious violations such as botting, hacking, or using macros. These actions undermine the integrity of the game and create an unfair environment for honest players. Permanent bans serve as a strong deterrent against such behavior and protect the community from repeated offenses.
 

Repeat Offenders:
I have been here in this community for a while now and my experience has shown that some individuals who are unbanned after a suspension period continue to engage in the same prohibited activities. This suggests that temporary bans are not always effective in reforming behavior. In some cases, users have even attempted to launch DDoS attacks on the servers. For these reasons, permanent bans are justified to ensure the safety and fairness of the game for all players.
 

staff is already lenient enough in their appeal process as long people are honest and have them in confidence that they won't repeat anything like that. And I don't understand the fact, how hard it is for people to follow the game rules. like I can understand you mishandle a auction those kinds of action can still be justified but not the other way around people who get perma ban are always the one with higher infraction history or who break like the top most rules like boting, hacking, bug abusing etc.  As an honest player, you follow the rules and contribute positively to the game community. It is not difficult to adhere to the guidelines set forth by the game. Those who intentionally break the rules not only harm themselves but also affect the experience of others. The rules are in place to maintain a fair and enjoyable environment for everyone, and those who cannot follow them should face the appropriate consequences.


Also, It is important to choose our words carefully. Referring to rule-breakers as "criminals" is inappropriate imo and can be seen as an overly harsh characterization. There might be some people who disagree with me on this, but I still believe that "criminal" is strong word to use for those rule breakers. 

Edited by Lucifer001
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...