Nineia Posted June 2, 2016 Share Posted June 2, 2016 I share the same opinium. If we can already have both ways it's not p2w at all. It's just making it smarter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bena Posted June 3, 2016 Share Posted June 3, 2016 174710 This would be too much pay2win I think. Surf / normal mounts are okay, but this is too much. Really don't get your point here. It's not like any player gets any other advantages over this new mount than having the two different mounts. Plus with it costing twice the amount of a normal mount it's balanced. There's hardly a new advantage given other than convenience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpadogge Posted June 3, 2016 Share Posted June 3, 2016 Okay then i say it so: its completely unnecessary. with pay2win i mean, i think its s***, that he can fly over the water. okay its not pay2win, but i dont like it. just my opinion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yamidragon Posted June 3, 2016 Share Posted June 3, 2016 If it can be coded, would be nice. Latios and Larias would be good examples of that kind of mounts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beast53 Posted June 3, 2016 Author Share Posted June 3, 2016 bump !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor Posted June 3, 2016 Share Posted June 3, 2016 This doesn't sound like a bad idea. But, how exactly would something like this work? Ergonomically I mean. the economical offsets have been explained (which i quite like). Do not contact staff members for private support. Share the question on the forums due to being of use to others. Please use proper forum. Unsolicited messages will be trashed. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluegg Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 I don't mind that idea, low priority however. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 This is something we might consider exploring in the future. Do not contact staff members for private support. Share the question on the forums due to being of use to others. Please use proper forum. Unsolicited messages will be trashed. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beast53 Posted June 6, 2016 Author Share Posted June 6, 2016 175594 This doesn't sound like a bad idea. But, how exactly would something like this work? Ergonomically I mean. the economical offsets have been explained (which i quite like). land mounts are made to pass on land tiles and surf mounts for water tiles , a flying type mount means it shouldn't be restricted from flying over water or land , meaning being able to move on both land and water tiles . like a pidgeot mount that can hover above both land and water with a graphic like its flapping its wings.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Excadril Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 This is a sick idea, there are a ton of cool flying pokemon i'd love to see Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts