I share the same opinium. If we can already have both ways it's not p2w at all. It's just making it smarter.

174710 This would be too much pay2win I think. Surf / normal mounts are okay, but this is too much.

 

Really don't get your point here. It's not like any player gets any other advantages over this new mount than having the two different mounts. Plus with it costing twice the amount of a normal mount it's balanced. There's hardly a new advantage given other than convenience.

Okay then i say it so: its completely unnecessary. with pay2win i mean, i think its s***, that he can fly over the water. okay its not pay2win, but i dont like it. just my opinion

If it can be coded, would be nice. Latios and Larias would be good examples of that kind of mounts

bump !!!

This doesn't sound like a bad idea.

 

But, how exactly would something like this work? Ergonomically I mean. the economical offsets have been explained (which i quite like).

I don't mind that idea, low priority however.

This is something we might consider exploring in the future.

175594 This doesn't sound like a bad idea.

 

But, how exactly would something like this work? Ergonomically I mean. the economical offsets have been explained (which i quite like).

land mounts are made to pass on land tiles and surf mounts for water tiles , a flying type mount means it shouldn't be restricted from flying over water or land , meaning being able to move on both land and water tiles . like a pidgeot mount that can hover above both land and water with a graphic like its flapping its wings....

This is a sick idea, there are a ton of cool flying pokemon i'd love to see