So I would suggest to make small dividend for example someone caught a descent Pokemon and sells it then if other person wants to resell it the original person gets 10% from the pot. Allow Pokemon sell it not more than in a month. A month once Pokemon can be sold.

Edited 2 hours ago2 hr by Theproud

-1

-1, what is this, pyramid scheme? lol

its to balance currency in a game for the players who touching the ground non stop and selling for few pokedollar.

Edited 2 hours ago2 hr by Theproud

-1

-1 stuipid idea , these are my pokemon or ones ive legally purchased from other and i should be free to sell them at whatever price i choose. By what right do you demand a 10% tax?

This would make trading unnecessarily complicated and discourage people from buying and reselling Pokémon. Why should the original owner keep earning 10% from something they no longer own? Once you've sold a Pokémon, it's no longer yours, so you shouldn't be entitled to future profits. The one month restriction is also pointless because it limits trading activity and makes the market less flexible. Imagine buying a Pokémon and then finding a better one the next day, but being forced to wait a month to sell it. This would create more problems than it solves.

20 minutes ago, Daicamax said:

-1 stuipid idea , these are my pokemon or ones ive legally purchased from other and i should be free to sell them at whatever price i choose. By what right do you demand a 10% tax?

I wonder where u getting so much money because definitely not a donator, and not touching thee grass or u do it I just wonder?U spend 130m and earned only 70m weird isnt u should protect my idea because if u catch good the Pokemon u automatically can become reach every month come money of course if its resells. I want to encourage more people to hunt and play The Pokemon Revolution Online.

Edited 7 minutes ago7 min by Theproud

16 minutes ago, Lacomus said:

This would make trading unnecessarily complicated and discourage people from buying and reselling Pokémon. Why should the original owner keep earning 10% from something they no longer own? Once you've sold a Pokémon, it's no longer yours, so you shouldn't be entitled to future profits. The one month restriction is also pointless because it limits trading activity and makes the market less flexible. Imagine buying a Pokémon and then finding a better one the next day, but being forced to wait a month to sell it. This would create more problems than it solves.

You can make laugh of me but i can give a small riddle to think for a day or what ever you want to solve it, why initials of the original owner staying with the Pokemon?