Sand Veil accuracy.

[Cobramk]

I dont really complain about pvp system in forum but its the time for me.

 

Are you sure about Garchomp Sand Veil, i miss x3 moves in a row and i never get this haxx in 7 years of pokemon.

 

This strategie is not very op, so much counter but when you are good and can win but fail x3 moves with you winCondition, he have a problem.

 

So, have a nice day.

 

CobraMK from Silver server.

[Bash]

In case you think Said Veil is bugged, I dont think so because 20% is kinda much but I agree, Sand Veil is annnoing. On other hand only Garchomp (As useful pokemon) has it.

[Cobramk]

In case you think Said Veil is bugged, I dont think so because 20% is kinda much but I agree, Sand Veil is annnoing. On other hand only Garchomp (As useful pokemon) has it.

I never said its bugged, just said % is not right, im not sure but its annoying to see player who abuse of this everytime.

 

Yeah only Garchomp have this and i dont want a ban because i see more TankChomp in PRO but when i see a Garchomp in sand, im really bad, i fail x2 Ice Punch with my Weavile 1 year ago and i was very salty for this.

[Bash]

I never said its bugged, just said % is not right, im not sure but its annoying to see player who abuse of this everytime.

 

Yeah only Garchomp have this and i dont want a ban because i see more TankChomp in PRO but when i see a Garchomp in sand, im really bad, i fail x2 Ice Punch with my Weavile 1 year ago and i was very salty for this.

 

oh okay, my bad. I set bugged = wrong %, which is wrong, sorry. But I see many ppl complaining about missing probability´s because most dont understant how it works. Of course i have no idea if the % is wrong but I assume it is like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambler's_fallacy

Because so many ppl think that the accuracy is rigged but it isnt, not only in pro :P

Edited July 7, 2018 by Bash

[Idkup]

0.2^3 = 0.008, 1/125. It was bound to happen eventually.

[Bash]

0.2^3 = 0.008, 1/125. It was bound to happen eventually.

Thats exactly what I wrote, there is a difference when and how you calculate probabilities. When you miss for example dragon claw 10 times in a row against a sand veil user, what is the

probability to miss the next dragon claw? It is 20%.

 

It is only 1/125 when you say you´ll miss 3 times in a row for the next 3 moves - (before you use the moves!)

[Idkup]

Thats exactly what I wrote, there is a difference when and how you calculate probabilities. When you miss for example dragon claw 10 times in a row against a sand veil user, what is the

probability to miss the next dragon claw? It is 20%.

 

It is only 1/125 when you say you´ll miss 3 times in a row for the next 3 moves - (before you use the moves!)

 

That's exactly my point, the chance he misses three times in a row is 1 in 125, which while low, isn't astronomically low. It makes sense in context because you don't often have the opportunity to miss three times in a row against Sand Veil Garchomp due to the fleeting nature of sandstorm, but it remains within the realm of possibility.

[Bash]

That's exactly my point, the chance he misses three times in a row is 1 in 125, which while low, isn't astronomically low. It makes sense in context because you don't often have the opportunity to miss three times in a row against Sand Veil Garchomp due to the fleeting nature of sandstorm, but it remains within the realm of possibility.

Yeah, I think I was to much into it xD