I dont really complain about pvp system in forum but its the time for me.

 

Are you sure about Garchomp Sand Veil, i miss x3 moves in a row and i never get this haxx in 7 years of pokemon.

 

This strategie is not very op, so much counter but when you are good and can win but fail x3 moves with you winCondition, he have a problem.

 

So, have a nice day.

 

CobraMK from Silver server.

In case you think Said Veil is bugged, I dont think so because 20% is kinda much but I agree, Sand Veil is annnoing. On other hand only Garchomp (As useful pokemon) has it.

In case you think Said Veil is bugged, I dont think so because 20% is kinda much but I agree, Sand Veil is annnoing. On other hand only Garchomp (As useful pokemon) has it.

I never said its bugged, just said % is not right, im not sure but its annoying to see player who abuse of this everytime.

 

Yeah only Garchomp have this and i dont want a ban because i see more TankChomp in PRO but when i see a Garchomp in sand, im really bad, i fail x2 Ice Punch with my Weavile 1 year ago and i was very salty for this.

I never said its bugged, just said % is not right, im not sure but its annoying to see player who abuse of this everytime.

 

Yeah only Garchomp have this and i dont want a ban because i see more TankChomp in PRO but when i see a Garchomp in sand, im really bad, i fail x2 Ice Punch with my Weavile 1 year ago and i was very salty for this.

 

oh okay, my bad. I set bugged = wrong %, which is wrong, sorry. But I see many ppl complaining about missing probability´s because most dont understant how it works. Of course i have no idea if the % is wrong but I assume it is like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambler's_fallacy

Because so many ppl think that the accuracy is rigged but it isnt, not only in pro :P

Edited July 7, 20188 yr by Bash

0.2^3 = 0.008, 1/125. It was bound to happen eventually.

0.2^3 = 0.008, 1/125. It was bound to happen eventually.

Thats exactly what I wrote, there is a difference when and how you calculate probabilities. When you miss for example dragon claw 10 times in a row against a sand veil user, what is the

probability to miss the next dragon claw? It is 20%.

 

It is only 1/125 when you say you´ll miss 3 times in a row for the next 3 moves - (before you use the moves!)

Thats exactly what I wrote, there is a difference when and how you calculate probabilities. When you miss for example dragon claw 10 times in a row against a sand veil user, what is the

probability to miss the next dragon claw? It is 20%.

 

It is only 1/125 when you say you´ll miss 3 times in a row for the next 3 moves - (before you use the moves!)

 

That's exactly my point, the chance he misses three times in a row is 1 in 125, which while low, isn't astronomically low. It makes sense in context because you don't often have the opportunity to miss three times in a row against Sand Veil Garchomp due to the fleeting nature of sandstorm, but it remains within the realm of possibility.

That's exactly my point, the chance he misses three times in a row is 1 in 125, which while low, isn't astronomically low. It makes sense in context because you don't often have the opportunity to miss three times in a row against Sand Veil Garchomp due to the fleeting nature of sandstorm, but it remains within the realm of possibility.

Yeah, I think I was to much into it xD