Jump to content

Cosanostra

Registered User
  • Posts

    502
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Cosanostra

  1. It s a real suggestion. Why people always deny when they don t have the same opinion ? It s just a suggestion about the next WQ. You considerer it s a troll, it s your opinion
  2. Hi, I purpose a next WQ rattata with 7-8m ivs. The 2 last WQ enable me to obtain a godly bidoof PvPable, so i would like the same thing for rattata. I think it s a good idea. Hope you understand me. A WQ : happy rattata day. Best regards,
  3. Player name: Cosanostra (ennemipublic is my second PvP account) Showdown name: CosaLeRital Server: Gold Timezone: GMT+2 Rank on ladder: 5
  4. Hi, Once again, we were shown the amateurism within the staff with this world quest. Don’t come and tell me that this has no relation between staff and players. Do you think the players are happy with this world quest? 3,500,000 ivs, that doesn't make sense. Did you take the time to calculate how many bidoofs you had to catch on average to get 0.5%? Did you factor in how long it would take to catch them first? Then finally, the time it took to give them to the mysterious cultist? I sincerely think that some players are angry, including me, and don’t come and tell me that it is the players' fault. Even a simple thing like picking ivs from a word quest you’re not able to do it, so what is it when it's complicated topics? It is frustrating and annoying. Think before making decisions, it will save you from dissatisfaction. In a decision-making process, I think that the reflection comes before the announcement of the decision and finally its implementation. I hope you will at least agree on this point. Best regards,
  5. +1, maybe give 50% to chance to obtain silver disc for 6th day instead of 7th day. 6th day: - 50% chance to obtain master ball - 50% chance to obtain silver disc
  6. Your problem is that you don’t learn to read. Read all that I've written after we'll talk
  7. This is not the main topic. Maybe for you, not for everybody
  8. Hi Walross, I think you are wrong when you say that it has nothing to do with the relationship between the community and the staff. All your decisions have an impact on the game and therefore on the community. If the community (except for a few specimens) finds that the decision makes no sense and influences the game in the bad way, they are likely to take it wrong and get pissed off. This affects the staff members, who for the most part have nothing to do with it and respond as well as they can. It's exactly the same in business (in real life). If your top manager tells you one thing one day and tells you something else the next day, it may get angry and have consequences on your work especially if you find that this change does not make sense. While being objective and honest, we've never heard of the bad 8 speed animations argument for surf mounts other than the Jetski. The only announcement we got was about the variety of surf mounts. Nothing else than that. I asked several players they answered me the same thing. I'll show you how a decision has an impact on the players, which can potentially deteriorate the relationship between the staff and the players. Let’s imagine that you are an average player, you see that the jetski is nerfed. Your first instinct is to sell the frame as quickly as possible before the prices drop too much. You sell your Jetski at 150-180k when it was worth the price of a coin capsule or 350k before the nerf. There were a lot of jetski for sale that day. The next day, you learn that the jetski you sold for 150k is exchangeable for a coin capsule. How do you take it? Probably wrong. You tell yourself that the staff could have foreseen this before. And if not, warn players that a npc was going to be put on the game. This information was never given. My goal is not to speak about the subject of Jetski itself but of the consequences that a decision has on the community either by communication or the way in which the decision is managed. Trust me the day you told me that the subject was closed and that it was not worth talking about it any longer it pissed me off especially when your decision did not make sense to my eyes. Only today you have just given me an explanation that makes sense (bad animations for surf mounts with speed 8 for example) while the nerf is at least 2 years old, maybe more. While being objective and honest, we've never heard of the bad 8 speed animations argument for surf mounts other than the Jetski before today. The only announcement we got was about the variety of surf mounts. Nothing else than that. I asked several players they answered me the same thing. I know that some players have requested UU and they are told that there will probably not be UU but random battle. This is not what the players originally asked for. When the players do not find meaning in a decision, they can get angry and lash out at the staff. I just wanted to point this out. Best regards
  9. Even if it happened to me in the past to be sometimes aggressive towards certain staff members, I will remain objective, impartial in my argument. Even if I think that staff members invest a lot of time in their tasks, I think that it is badly distributed, and sometimes for things that do not make sense or do not go in the direction of the players. 4 argued examples: 1) Summer tournament 2020. I really enjoyed the one in 2019 (the first and only one in which I participated), it allowed me to meet lots of players and sometimes to advise or be advised in PvP. I expected to participate in the 2020 one. In this regard, announcements had been made on this subject for the registrations for the 2020 tournament. Then, radio silence, no more news or much too late. I think a lot of time was invested to get the mega released in time for this tournament. However, we played for years without a mega, so I don't think it was dramatic if we have summer tournament without the mega. Strictly speaking, a winter tournament could have been proposed to play with the new megas. The summer tournament seemed like a tradition to me, an event that only happens once every year. To sump up with this example: · The staff missed his communication by opening the registrations and then leaving the players in artistic vagueness. · Then the time invested on the megas did not benefit the players who wanted to participate in the summer tournament. Personally, I am disappointed not to have been able to compete in the summer tournament, especially since there was no reason to cancel it. It pissed me off. 2) Jet ski speed / Surf mounts. It is the perfect example which proves the dysfunctions between staff and players. First, we nerfed jetski. One day later after received many complaints, you have decided to reimburse players for a coin capsule for those who no longer wish to use this surf mount. The reimbursement was a good thing, but really to late (one day is really too late… ). Indeed, some players decided to sell their jetski at prices divided by 2 to 3 the original value. Second, for a very long time you did not explain why you made this decision to nerf the speed of the jetski. Then you explained why you nerfed Jetski, for more diversity, totally understandable Third, I think this decision was the worst to take. 4 options were available to you: - nerf the jetski and reimburse players with a coin capsule and improve the speed of other surf mounts (but these don't go as fast as the jetski) - increase the speed of the surf mounts to the same speed as the Jetski and reimburse the players with a coin capsule for the players who no longer want their Jetski. - reimburse the players with a coin capsule for players who no longer want their Jetski and put the price of the jetskis at the same price as the other surf mounts in the shop. You took the worst decision. Fourth, I decided to make a suggestion about this topic. No one answered me. So I decided to make my suggestion in a popular and debated thread, where I was obviously off topic and was more likely to get an answer. Walross clearly told me that I was off topic (which was true). He explained to me that the subject was closed and that it was not worth discussing it any longer. It doesn't seem to me to be an attitude of dialogue between players and staff. This attitude and decision to nerf the speed of the Jetski that makes no sense pissed me off once again. 3) Guild tournament. Although this tournament is a first, in my opinion there has been a lack of organization and a total ignorance of the players who want to finish the tournament. We waited too long for nothing. Instability of the servers is not a valid apology, there were easier ways to end this tournament quickly. No needs to mention the delays caused by some teams who easily took their time between each round. 4-5 rounds gap between the winner and loser bracket… To sum up, this tournament revealed several things: - a lack of organization - poor communication - ignorance of the players on the part of some members of the staff who probably considered that the players were not important. - apparent conflicts between staff members 4) Respect. I already feel the mockery coming about this subject, especially when this remark comes from me. I tried many ways to discuss with staff: · calm and constructed · aggressive and constructed (I tried the aggressivity when I’m really pissed off about attitude and decisions of staff) · comical Before being aggressive, some staff members have missed and perhaps lack respect to the players. I think it's important to name people so I'll give some names. For example, I spoke to logan about Predators Guild Drama about the power in this guild via discord. The first sentence I received from LOGAN is: “Should I ban you?”. I'm not a child, and I think there is a better way to express yourself, including starting by saying “hello “and not being contemptuous towards players. I don’t have personal problem with Prehax / Qeight / Felix, but I saw that some of his answers are both contemptuous of the players and the staff members. When I saw thread from Prehax, I have the feeling that the staff do not shake one of them and he’s the only ones able to do something, a kind of superhero or savior, I do not like this behavior. He disrespects some players when they try to make some suggestions without being aggressive and get censored because it does not go in his opinion. If we read my post, don’t be upset, I tried to be as impartial as possible. I pointed out the dysfunctions, but I know that there is a desire to do well among certain members of the staff. Do not consider my post as criticism aimed at overwhelming the staff. My english is bad. If you want more explanations, feel free to contact me
  10. Hi, I made a game in Silver server. Damage i made are anormal. Normally I have to do more damage than the damage I did. Normally diggerbsy band earthquake ohko torkoal and it made only 70%. With hydreigon life orb with sun against venusaur I should make 150% minimum and i made 90%. Same for darmanitan with earth power. Pvp is fully bugged. Don't Pvp ! I send you like of my record : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIh112v04TQ
  11. Player name: Cosanostra Showdown name: CosaLeRital Server: Gold Timezone: GMT +2 Rank on ladder: 10
  12. Player name : Cosanostra Server : Gold Timezone : GMT+2
  13. I don't know what you made, but now it works. The message "This place looks perfect to hide and wait for the culprit." appeared. When i tried before this report the message never appeared. Thanks now it works Best regards, Cosanostra
  14. I had this problem too. I respected the process, the mawile is non-OT but level 100 full hapiness and women doesn't appear in the night. I don't know why
  15. Player name: Cosanostra Showdown name: CosaLeRital Server: Gold Timezone: GMT+2 Rank on ladder: 6
×
×
  • Create New...