Gracee

600k kong

1.5m

@Antizheng heyy lemme know when u can be online , and please mention with the @ tho i didn't get a notification of winning the auction & for now i am also mentioning @Shellos to pick up her lopunny

1m

600k from silver

@Drakloak Sorry to interupt the flow but i got something to say on the behalf of @Qwertyqwerty08 The Bid of "1.2m" was clearly understood by all participants to refer to tangrowth because: The active bidding war at that moment was only for Tangrowth Previous bids were already shortened " 900k tang", "1m tang" , "1.1m tang" The auctioneer did not reject or question it, and another participants immediately continued with bidding with 1.3m tang, clearly shows that meaning of 1.2m bid was understood Rules requiring accurate bids are intended to prevent confusion during the auction itself. In this case, no confusion occurred, the auction continued normally, and all participants acted as though the bid was valid in real time. If the bid was genuinely considered invalid, the correct procedure would have been to stop and reject it immediately before further bids occurred. I don't have a personal problem with the outcome or any other player but its just unfair for the player who have participated in the auction thinking their bid is valid i am just curious what would the staff do in this situation or just follow the original trade rules Thankyouu (Again no offence) Gracee

start sneasel

sry for the inconvenience , i will be a little busy and unable to handle the auction consistently it wont happen again

500k inf

250k both and @Antizhengu dont need to post "noted" on every reply on the auction , u can just react on the bid that help the bidder to know that u see it ,

800k

1m8 gli

1m4 gli

a