Jump to content

PRO Viability Rankings (PVP)


Maui

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 292
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Re: PRO Viability Rankings (PVP) v0.95.9

 

<t>Also can you perhaps clean up ranks a bit to get rid of some clearly non-viable Pokemon like Eelektross and Floatzel, which really have no place in this meta?</t>

Fu2zc9T.jpg

Thanks to MadFrost for the signature!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: PRO Viability Rankings (PVP) v0.95.9

 

<r><QUOTE author="idkup"><s>

</s><POST content="337132"><s></s>337132<e></e></POST> Also can you perhaps clean up ranks a bit to get rid of some clearly non-viable Pokemon like Eelektross and Floatzel, which really have no place in this meta?<e>
</e></QUOTE>

Done. <E>:y:</E></r>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: PRO Viability Rankings (PVP) v0.95.9

 

<r><QUOTE author="idkup"><s>

</s><POST content="337132"><s></s>337132<e></e></POST> Also can you perhaps clean up ranks a bit to get rid of some clearly non-viable Pokemon like Eelektross and Floatzel, which really have no place in this meta?<e>
</e></QUOTE>Eelektross is clearly viable on the current meta . Poliwrath should be ranked aswell , at least B+</r>

Mimimimimimimii

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: PRO Viability Rankings (PVP) v0.95.9

 

<r><QUOTE author="SheWas18"><s>

</s><POST content="337653"><s></s>337653<e></e></POST> Poliwrath should be ranked aswell , at least B+<e>
</e></QUOTE>

Could you elaborate more on this?<br/>

I'm interested in hearing your thoughts on this <E>:Smile:</E></r>

Do not contact staff members for private support. Share your questions on the forums as they could be useful to others.

Remember to use the correct forum when posting. Unsolicited messages will be trashed. Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: PRO Viability Rankings (PVP) v0.95.9

 

<r><QUOTE author="SheWas18"><s>

</s><POST content="337653"><s></s>337653<e></e></POST> <QUOTE author="idkup"><s>
</s><POST content="337132"><s></s>337132<e></e></POST> Also can you perhaps clean up ranks a bit to get rid of some clearly non-viable Pokemon like Eelektross and Floatzel, which really have no place in this meta?<e>
</e></QUOTE>Eelektross is clearly viable on the current meta . <e>
</e></QUOTE>

Agreed. It has no weaknesses, okay defensive stats and a great offensive movepool as well as access to a lot of utility moves. <br/>

<br/>

For example it can switch in comfortably against an Excadrill and threaten it with flamethrower..</r>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: PRO Viability Rankings (PVP) v0.95.9

 

<t>It's probably the best thing you can pair with clefa imo , this core is pretty self-efficient , few pokemons are annoying , but are kind of ok to cover .(bird,zone,poison) only one set is viable tho , scald/circle throw/restalk self-explanatory phazer set , and checks 80-90% of the meta paired with clefa .(don't run flamehtrow )</t>

Mimimimimimimii

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...