Re: PRO Viability Rankings (PVP) v0.95.8

 

<r>Bump, time for a small update given the recent changes? <E>:Grin:</E></r>

Re: PRO Viability Rankings (PVP) v0.95.8

 

<t>Clefable has to be at least A+ with Magic Guard being coded.</t>

Re: PRO Viability Rankings (PVP) v0.95.8

 

<t>also gengar, weavile, sand rush excadrill, and the other fast but frail mons that benefit immensely from life orb need a bump</t>

Re: PRO Viability Rankings (PVP) v0.95.8

 

<t>I'm going to make some adjustments right now. Thanks for the reminder guys.</t>

Re: PRO Viability Rankings (PVP) v0.95.9

 

<t>Also can you perhaps clean up ranks a bit to get rid of some clearly non-viable Pokemon like Eelektross and Floatzel, which really have no place in this meta?</t>

Re: PRO Viability Rankings (PVP) v0.95.9

 

<r><QUOTE author="idkup"><s>

</s><POST content="337132"><s></s>337132<e></e></POST> Also can you perhaps clean up ranks a bit to get rid of some clearly non-viable Pokemon like Eelektross and Floatzel, which really have no place in this meta?<e>

</e></QUOTE>

Done. <E>:y:</E></r>

Re: PRO Viability Rankings (PVP) v0.95.9

 

<r><QUOTE author="idkup"><s>

</s><POST content="337132"><s></s>337132<e></e></POST> Also can you perhaps clean up ranks a bit to get rid of some clearly non-viable Pokemon like Eelektross and Floatzel, which really have no place in this meta?<e>

</e></QUOTE>Eelektross is clearly viable on the current meta . Poliwrath should be ranked aswell , at least B+</r>

Re: PRO Viability Rankings (PVP) v0.95.9

 

<r><QUOTE author="SheWas18"><s>

</s><POST content="337653"><s></s>337653<e></e></POST> Poliwrath should be ranked aswell , at least B+<e>

</e></QUOTE>

Could you elaborate more on this?<br/>

I'm interested in hearing your thoughts on this <E>:Smile:</E></r>

Re: PRO Viability Rankings (PVP) v0.95.9

 

<r><QUOTE author="SheWas18"><s>

</s><POST content="337653"><s></s>337653<e></e></POST> <QUOTE author="idkup"><s>

</s><POST content="337132"><s></s>337132<e></e></POST> Also can you perhaps clean up ranks a bit to get rid of some clearly non-viable Pokemon like Eelektross and Floatzel, which really have no place in this meta?<e>

</e></QUOTE>Eelektross is clearly viable on the current meta . <e>

</e></QUOTE>

Agreed. It has no weaknesses, okay defensive stats and a great offensive movepool as well as access to a lot of utility moves. <br/>

<br/>

For example it can switch in comfortably against an Excadrill and threaten it with flamethrower..</r>

Re: PRO Viability Rankings (PVP) v0.95.9

 

<t>It's probably the best thing you can pair with clefa imo , this core is pretty self-efficient , few pokemons are annoying , but are kind of ok to cover .(bird,zone,poison) only one set is viable tho , scald/circle throw/restalk self-explanatory phazer set , and checks 80-90% of the meta paired with clefa .(don't run flamehtrow )</t>