Enforcer Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 Re: PRO Viability Rankings (PVP) v0.95.8 <r>Bump, time for a small update given the recent changes? <E>:Grin:</E></r> Link to comment https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/topic/11841-pro-viability-rankings-pvp/page/15/#findComment-94073 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chameleon Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 Re: PRO Viability Rankings (PVP) v0.95.8 <t>Clefable has to be at least A+ with Magic Guard being coded.</t> Link to comment https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/topic/11841-pro-viability-rankings-pvp/page/15/#findComment-94074 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Idkup Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 Re: PRO Viability Rankings (PVP) v0.95.8 <t>also gengar, weavile, sand rush excadrill, and the other fast but frail mons that benefit immensely from life orb need a bump</t> Thanks to MadFrost for the signature! Link to comment https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/topic/11841-pro-viability-rankings-pvp/page/15/#findComment-94075 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tr3y Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 Re: PRO Viability Rankings (PVP) v0.95.8 <t>I'm going to make some adjustments right now. Thanks for the reminder guys.</t> Link to comment https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/topic/11841-pro-viability-rankings-pvp/page/15/#findComment-94076 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Idkup Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 Re: PRO Viability Rankings (PVP) v0.95.9 <t>Also can you perhaps clean up ranks a bit to get rid of some clearly non-viable Pokemon like Eelektross and Floatzel, which really have no place in this meta?</t> Thanks to MadFrost for the signature! Link to comment https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/topic/11841-pro-viability-rankings-pvp/page/15/#findComment-94077 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tr3y Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 Re: PRO Viability Rankings (PVP) v0.95.9 <r><QUOTE author="idkup"><s></s><POST content="337132"><s></s>337132<e></e></POST> Also can you perhaps clean up ranks a bit to get rid of some clearly non-viable Pokemon like Eelektross and Floatzel, which really have no place in this meta?<e></e></QUOTE> Done. <E>:y:</E></r> Link to comment https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/topic/11841-pro-viability-rankings-pvp/page/15/#findComment-94078 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shewas18 Posted January 17, 2017 Share Posted January 17, 2017 Re: PRO Viability Rankings (PVP) v0.95.9 <r><QUOTE author="idkup"><s></s><POST content="337132"><s></s>337132<e></e></POST> Also can you perhaps clean up ranks a bit to get rid of some clearly non-viable Pokemon like Eelektross and Floatzel, which really have no place in this meta?<e></e></QUOTE>Eelektross is clearly viable on the current meta . Poliwrath should be ranked aswell , at least B+</r> Mimimimimimimii Link to comment https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/topic/11841-pro-viability-rankings-pvp/page/15/#findComment-94079 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suhuzen Posted January 17, 2017 Share Posted January 17, 2017 Re: PRO Viability Rankings (PVP) v0.95.9 <r><QUOTE author="SheWas18"><s></s><POST content="337653"><s></s>337653<e></e></POST> Poliwrath should be ranked aswell , at least B+<e></e></QUOTE> Could you elaborate more on this?<br/> I'm interested in hearing your thoughts on this <E>:Smile:</E></r> Do not contact staff members for private support. Share your questions on the forums as they could be useful to others. Remember to use the correct forum when posting. Unsolicited messages will be trashed. Thanks. Link to comment https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/topic/11841-pro-viability-rankings-pvp/page/15/#findComment-94080 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chameleon Posted January 17, 2017 Share Posted January 17, 2017 Re: PRO Viability Rankings (PVP) v0.95.9 <r><QUOTE author="SheWas18"><s></s><POST content="337653"><s></s>337653<e></e></POST> <QUOTE author="idkup"><s></s><POST content="337132"><s></s>337132<e></e></POST> Also can you perhaps clean up ranks a bit to get rid of some clearly non-viable Pokemon like Eelektross and Floatzel, which really have no place in this meta?<e></e></QUOTE>Eelektross is clearly viable on the current meta . <e></e></QUOTE> Agreed. It has no weaknesses, okay defensive stats and a great offensive movepool as well as access to a lot of utility moves. <br/> <br/> For example it can switch in comfortably against an Excadrill and threaten it with flamethrower..</r> Link to comment https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/topic/11841-pro-viability-rankings-pvp/page/15/#findComment-94081 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shewas18 Posted January 17, 2017 Share Posted January 17, 2017 Re: PRO Viability Rankings (PVP) v0.95.9 <t>It's probably the best thing you can pair with clefa imo , this core is pretty self-efficient , few pokemons are annoying , but are kind of ok to cover .(bird,zone,poison) only one set is viable tho , scald/circle throw/restalk self-explanatory phazer set , and checks 80-90% of the meta paired with clefa .(don't run flamehtrow )</t> Mimimimimimimii Link to comment https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/topic/11841-pro-viability-rankings-pvp/page/15/#findComment-94082 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now