Zonamarelarap Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 160578 160575 is more sense pokes on rock smash pokes in dig spots no make sense Pokemon in a rock is more logic than a hidden Pokemon under the ground ? of course make more sense/logic, dig spot for itens and rocks from rock smash to hidden pokes '-' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zonamarelarap Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 160582 160578 160575 is more sense pokes on rock smash pokes in dig spots no make sense Pokemon in a rock is more logic than a hidden Pokemon under the ground ? +1 +1 what? this ins't google+ :Crazy: but hidden pokes make more sense on rock smash ;) hidden pokes on dig spot is a super bad ideia :Proud: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Styrbiorn Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 160589 Already available? Route 3 is :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lamarkette Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 it was better before... I hate having geodudes in digspot, it makes it too long to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calvinounet Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 160591 160578 160575 is more sense pokes on rock smash pokes in dig spots no make sense Pokemon in a rock is more logic than a hidden Pokemon under the ground ? of course make more sense/logic, dig spot for itens and rocks from rock smash to hidden pokes '-' Sorry but i disagree. There is no reasons to have pokemon with rock smash. If you look the real life, only bug and some lizard are under rock. But you have a looooooot of animals who live under the ground. So just for the realism, it makes more sense to do as now. Secondly, you bring zero argument for why you don't like it. So I think you just don't like the change. But change is normal, it's progress and evolution. So you don't like it and you have the right, but you will adapt to this. PS: My english is not perfect, sorry for that.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deadpoolz Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 thanks for the information.. very helpful :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0bi Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 COOL.. i'll try it later.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitsugastyle Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 160624 160589 Already available? Route 3 is :D Fantastic! Thanks :Shy: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hadrimanium Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 Imma go start diggin right away! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zonamarelarap Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 160646 160591 160578 Pokemon in a rock is more logic than a hidden Pokemon under the ground ? of course make more sense/logic, dig spot for itens and rocks from rock smash to hidden pokes '-' Sorry but i disagree. There is no reasons to have pokemon with rock smash. If you look the real life, only bug and some lizard are under rock. But you have a looooooot of animals who live under the ground. So just for the realism, it makes more sense to do as now. Secondly, you bring zero argument for why you don't like it. So I think you just don't like the change. But change is normal, it's progress and evolution. So you don't like it and you have the right, but you will adapt to this. PS: My english is not perfect, sorry for that.. I disagree because even under a rock may have holes to another if the rock is not a rock and be in reality a pokemon (Geodude among others) Now tell me if this is following the "real life" says the headbutt as a piloswine climbs up a tree? as a wooper climbs up a tree? as a turwig climbs up a tree? among others... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts