Ban 3 topmost used Pokemon for one month

[Foncross]

Advantages:

·         It will change the next month meta

·         Players with different types of strategy will have better chances to reach the top next month

·         Players that used the banned Pokemon will have to flex into something else meaning that not all of them will reach the top next month.

·         PVP battles will be healthier,

For example,

1.      if we want to use mega Camerupt we cannot use it because Alomomola is in almost 50% of the games, 4x weakness, can heal up another Pokemon with wish and in the end the Camerupt player will lose 2 turns as Alomomola will use flip turn to reposition, saying this It may be useful next month

2.      we may be seeing more Scrafty dragon dance, Hydreigon or Zoroark as Clefable special defense wall with moonlight/protect/calm mind will not be available.

3.      If Ursaluna is banned we may see more Conkeldurrs, Machamps or Throhs that is even weirder

 

Disadvantages:

·         Some of the players will feel discouraged because they cannot use the same strategy and they may stop playing for the month.

·         It may bring more players, but I do not know if it is good as sometimes the server is a bit laggy.

·         If one of the top three banned Pokemon is keeping in line another strong Pokemon, the next month that Pokemon may be unstoppable

 

Below the image I got from discord sever
https://walrosskastanie.com/aa1af6191183679662c0a465.png

[Sugurugeto666]

Tas mal ojalá no te hagan caso 

[Poopsmagoops]

-1 for a lot of reasons

 

also this is probably the worst way to get new people to play and pvp. Hunting a catching and training a pvp team takes time. And if I do that as a new player and two of my pokes get banned I now have to go find other things if not build a completely new team. 

[Foncross]

Poopsmagoops that’s the meaning of the post, that’s the reason why the suggestion is only for the top 3 most used. Also the next moth after the ban that Pokemon will be back in the pull.

 

The reason it will bring more players is because they will have the opportunity to play something new, I enconunter a player with Chandelure infiltrator but as 50% of the games had Alomomolas the player was not able to play his favorite Pokemon, same as me I like Feraligart but I cannot use it in the current meta because it never changes, with this change it will give versability and spread the rumor because other games doesn’t  have it.

 

One of the best thing that you can get in a game is future expectations, people will be happy to see Alomomola, Clefable and Ursaluna be freed after the ban, also other people will be happy to not have it at least for one month, again the ban will be only for one month.

[Raika]

-1

Would this thread have been made if Clef and Alo weren't top 3? Hmmm

[Ruthlessslayer]

+1, the negative comments are salty that they can't live without clefable and alomomola. I always support the idea of new team synergy and strategies over repeating the same team over and over again. Or bring uu format alive, I am okay with both of that.

Edited Monday at 06:49 AM by Ruthlessslayer

[Xouman]

-1

 

It makes no sense to ban a poke for a period of time to me just because it's used or very used instead of being so op that it becomes poison to the game and that 8-9 players out of 10 will say that the(or the majority of the community,call that how you want)poke deserve to be ban.

 

Players who want that type of forced rotation are saying "Hey i get destroyed by this or this or this or this pokes,so let's ban them a bit so i can have a chance to win few games at least",that's a weak mentality imo,studying the game + understanding why we lose + battling a lot = getting better = win more games.

 

The game shouldn't be less tough on us so our path will be easier but instead,we must build strong teams & play smart every turn to win.

Edited Tuesday at 08:20 PM by Xouman