Envymeister

WTB the following Pokes or Evos: Tangela or Tangrowth : Relaxed & HP ICE - IVS: 25+ Def & HP ; 20+ others Budget: 5M Azurill or Marill or Azumarill : Adamant - IVS: 31 Atk & Speed ; 20+ others (except sp.atk) Budget: 5M Cleffa or Clefairy or Clefable : Bold - IVS: 25+ Def & Speed & HP ; 20+ Sp.atk & Sp.Def Budget: 3M

bump

+1 to idea of changing the pokes -1 to Slurpuff, Sandlash-alolan,dragalge, braviary I would say Serp, Greninja, Ninetales, Alolan-Marowak, Garchomp would sound better

bump for the best

Hello, hello. Ok this is a pvp suggestion that i believe many of PvP players will agree with (hopefully). As we all know each account can have one legend type only, thats why its legend, one per acc. But as many of us know, many legends can be played with multiple sets, lets give an example: Zapdos can be played Bold or Timid. But we can only have one at a time. So i came with an idea of, why wont we get a way, an NPC or something similar, that would save 2 sets on the same pokemon? Let me explain. We would need at least 2 nature rerolls, and in case we cant to change again we would need another nature reroll to do so. The only thing that the NPC would save would be the Nature and the EVS (nopt just bc the trainning would be painful, but mostly the berries spent...) The ivs would stay exactly the same in each set, u would need to change them by using a reroll iv. I think this way we have an option to have 2 sets per legend, while only having 1 legend per acc! Anyway other way would be, the nature reroll instead giving the nature to the legend, would unlock forever that nature on that legend. example: i would use 5 Nature rerolls on MEW(Timid, Jolly, Calm, Bold, Naive) and i would be able to swap between them all, since they would be unlocked, woudnt need more nature rerolls. and each time i change nature, the evs would be reset. Honestly i do prefer the first one. :P Hope you guys might agree with me, if not tell me why, give feedback, problems that this would cause, and solutions! :)

I wont even waste a single second reading this, sinceit comed from the guy that says: Volcarona is a rain sweeper ^o anyway. knew many wouldnt agree. and ok. i get it, many dont like it. all i wanted was simple: shouldnt have ever changed from gen6 to gen7 when we lacked so many things, gen6 was incomplete, which made this gen7 super incomplete. all im saying. But bring the hammer and hit me with it for sharing an opinion that u guys dont share ^^

First the ones that are making the Pvp Rework is Wally and Cames, not the cs. and yes they coding everything from scratch, thats why its taking so long. if u read my previous post, all ur arguments prove that we shouldnt have got the move to gen7 in the first place :D what about those that bought a talon before the nerf? not saying im doing this bc of it, again i wanted to revert everything to gen6. Because i believe we dont have enough tools, to support a new generation. Gen6 in PRO was incomplete, and moving forward to a new gengeration, made it even more incomplete.

Iam seeing many saying all or nothing. yes, i desired all gen7 would be reverted to gen6. Because i never agreed with this transaction in tehe first place. As many of you say, its either all back like levitate gengar, roost mantine etc, or nothing. we could appply that in another way. Back when we were in Gen6, if we apply the all or nothing, we shouldnt have moved to gen7 when half of the stuff wasnt coded. we would move to gen7 once EVERYTHING would be coded. If we lack many things from gen6. we will lack even more things from gen7. It will make Gen7 even more incomplete compared to gen6. Dont forget something this isnt showdown aswell, we cant do a ban list and done. We work with economy, banning a poke will mean destroy the economy of it.

Indeed it sound but u can ask devs to check my acc and alts. i own 0 talonflames or pre-evos.

Indeed having many teams is good. couldnt agree more. but some of them are in a way unfair, since things that can stop them from being good, isnt coded :/

Q8 i dont like blacklists bc we live according with poke economy. if u ban a poke, lets say conk! the prices wil ldrop to near 0. just like what happen to talon and goth. and that will ruin the economy

Since i suggested this, im try to explain the reason behind it. i understand many will be against this move, and i can clearly say i totally understand your point. But hope u take a few minutes to think about this. right now we playing with gen 7 mechanics, and as we all know Volt-turn, Substitute, Landorus, megas, Z-moves wont be here for a while. Meanwhile the meta isnt clear. We have many flaws. Trick room teams: trick room teams are so strong if u have the right tools. But one of the ways to stop this is by having a poke with Substitute, this move alone can win a match vs tr teams Stall is just annoying to play against it. both volt-turn and sub would make stall less influent. Weather teams (sun and rain) since talon got nerfed these raised alot. manaohy is a monster rn.... I know im not going into much details, but these are main topics for this decison. Many will be against others will actually agree. This would be just until we get the big pvp update. After that we would get Gen7 fully, hopefully.

I would like to suggest to add a Field loaded with Leppa Berries, just like there is one of Lum Berries at Rage Lake, i would like to suggest to add another one but with Leppas Berries, since this one is really important for hunting :) Thx

Hallo there. i released my HP ice tangela. i dont know which one is it, but here are the ids of the ones i deleted: thx

So i have read the rules, and it says: As we all know Kyurem has 660 total base stats, and accordingto PRO pvp Rules, Therefore, Kyurem is banned. End of story :)

-1 would ruin economy :)

Bump for the best!

Buying HA Alola-Marowak. Nature: something with +atk: Brave > Adamant > Naughty Pay millions!!!

-1 for thge first point, since doesnt make much sense, in my opinion, no game ever had that, not even SD. +1 for the other two suggestions.

Indeed, that a person with just 1 account will be at disavantage. but first what we suggest was max 2 accs, and not 4. but even if it would allow us to have 4 accs with that method, well these people with just 1 acc has a nice solution: make 3 more accs, and do story just like everyone with 4 already have, so i dont see the point here. :) its not like u cant make more than 1 acc, u just dont want extra work, but those that dont mind to do that little effort will be rewarded :)

@Tigerous Yo can u delete and warn people that makes comments off-topic here? thx :)

true xD 4 might be alot. i would be happy with 2 tbh. so many legends can have multiple natures: Suicune, Zapdos, Heatran, Mew, Manaphy, Jirachi. Would be cool to have that feature. xD my friend i am an old player, i have tons of experience not just about PRO but Pokemon. And about the ''boosting'' i dont need legends to pass the story lol. i can just transfer a Ratata lvl100 and it will solo pass the story. So i dont get your point, all i can see is someone that dont get the point of pvp players. For bosses (hard mode, yes only mode that gives good money) Legends are mostly useless, maybe Mew is the only one that actually works. So far, all your comments, IN MY OPINION, are off topic. Since there are multipleboss teams (that dont needANY legend) that will defeat all bosses. And any Poke lvl100 can easy pass the whole story. :shrug:

My friend. that will be impossible. if u only have Kanto story done, means all others regions pokes will be locked. ya heatran is from Sinnoh, Suicune from Johto. it will all be locked if u dont have the region done. Tell me, how in the world this topic is related to PVE coins?! Its being said to swap legends between accounts (ur accs) yes each person has a different idea on how to do this. i do agree with Hero in some parts others i think differently. For what i have read so far ur knowledge is none existence. Just calm down, read every post and try to understand everyone's ways of thinking, because clearly this PvE stuff isnt related to this topic at all.

+1 i do agree with such idea, if both accounts did the quest to have the legendary that are trying to swap that is. This way it will allow players to have the same legend, one per account, but with different natures, allowing more options for PvP. Lets take the example of Heatran, since Bold, Calm, Modest, Timid all of these are very useful, but each nature gives heatran a different play style, and with the system we have now we cant properly play multiple ways. And players will start know which nature the enemy have => will predict them much easily. Btw, to all those that never played PvP / have 0 knowledge about PvP, stop commenting and boasting, get experience and knowledge before talking ^^ Edit: for what i have been reading seems like people dont know this but, a person can have to the max of 4 accs. if u get more u can be banned for it. so if it goes like this u can have the max of 4 legends. one per account, and in my suggestions when u swap the legends between accs, will prevent one acc to have more than 1 legend, keeping it balanced and fair.

PLAYER CATEGORY Smartest Cames Friendliest Imhanjoo Funniest Yogi/Archr Coolest GoldMarieChen Comeback Player of the Year CobraMK Most Talkative TheUnderTakerBr Most Trustworthy Samurai Most Helpful Penny Most Missed Cyber Most Influential Y0da Most Intriguing Taintedtruth Most Experienced Player Mamathieu Best/Funniest Username Nicotine Most Professional Guide Maker Waleed1301 Most Professional Discord Moderator : I cant know, im banned there :´(, but i would assume Waleed. he is a good guy :) STAFF CATEGORY Best Mapper Aspheric Best Artist Sirmeowington Best Content Scripter Alcedo Best Community Coordinator HappyMango Best Moderator Mutantnair Best Trade Moderator Tigerous Best Tester Gorem Best Game Master Logan Best Admin: Red Best Staff Username HappyMango Most Professional Staff Shinohara Most Dedicated Staff Eaty Funniest Staff Shaolan Friendliest Staff Shaolan Most Honorable Former Staff: Rekkuza Most Missed Former Staff Chappy