-
Posts
1047 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
Everything posted by Purplemauth
-
Ill start 700. Is there an end time?
-
Complaining about "sniping" is equivalent to complaining that people are bidding on your pokemon within the allotted time that you, as the auctioneer has determined. If you don't want people bidding at the last second then you shouldn't have an auction, you should have an instant price because you don't actually want everyone to have a fair chance at the pokemon, you just want a certain dollar amount. If you had a better chance at securing a pokemon you wanted, why wouldn't you take that advantage? Last minute bidding is a part of every auction in the world and other games. Ebay, Estate sales, bidding on storage units, Auction houses in any other video game (Which, if one is being implemented into PRO, will allow you to bid within a certain time frame. Everyone will bid at the last minute so that there is less time for other users to respond. This is the basic functionality of an auction.). Why not try and actually emulate what the auction house is going to be? This is the only "economy" that actually tries to remove power from the people who wish to participate to enable sellers who want to get certain prices and sell pokemon only if they get their price. If you are willing to put something up for auction, that means you are willing to sell it. It should be as simple as that. If you are not actually willing to sell it, it breaks the rules because it is a fake sale. My previous point outlines that in detail. Do these two statements not completely contradict each other? Did you not change a rule because of many people suggesting a rule change? Is that not what this thread is also doing? Suggesting a tweak to the rules? I am just curious as to what makes those suggestions different than these suggestions.
-
If you aren't willing to sell it for a certain price (that you, as the auctioneer can decide at will), that is fake selling. Rule 11 clearly reads: 11. Fake Offering/Selling/Bidding with no intention to buy/sell is prohibited. Auctions that are put up with an intention to see if they can start low to raise the price and get in a bid-off mean that the minimum offer they are posting is thereby fake. If they have no intention to sell for that price, that should be considered a fake and punished as such. Allowing people to cancel auctions because of "low offers" is a controlled situation in which the seller set a price that they were not actually happy with. The necessary channels exist for people to get an accurate valuation of their pokemon (Price checks exist in game, on the forum, and on multiple Discord servers). If they disagree with the valuations given, they should set their minimum as what they believe, rather than fishing for more money. It is dishonest and as bidders have commented above, ultimately hurts the auction and the people who are willing to participate.
-
The core value of the game is that you have to hunt for your pokemon, not that you can catch anything and fix it. It just removes the whole point of syncing things anyways if you can just change the nature on anything. I think allowing this is a slippery slope, which means that if this happens then soon you can change one IV for X amount of pokedollars, then two, then eventually it just turns p2w. one million pokedollars is not a lot of money anymore - you can make 150k with dig spots every 3 days, and another 500k from bosses. You could essentially get a reroll every two weeks.
-
Idea originally taken from this post, however it was kind of buried and I really think this would be an awesome addition: https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/topic/120960-url full credit of the idea goes to @Abygaelle , just want to flush it out more and make sure the idea gets noticed. Function is very similar to bug catching. You fish for pokemon that are all different rarity tiers. Apply a formula based on that rarity/level/other factors and then can get awarded money/pve coins/prizes for doing it. Create a custom map for it with an area that transports you there for a certain time period. Goldeen, Magikarp, Psyduck, Poliwag as tier ones. Remoraid, Horsea, Walimer, Finneon as tier twos. Clamperl, Staryu, Relicanth, Lotad as tier threes. Wailord, Gyarados, Sharpedo, Lapras as tier fours (I picked these ones more for the actual physical size that they are, not rarity since fishing derby's are usually about who gets the biggest fish) Rewards: Corphish, Basculin, Tirtouga, assorted surf mounts (maybe one thats exclusive to this event), money, PvE coins, etc. Again, not my original idea, (@Abygaelle) but I think its a tremendous idea and I want to make sure that it gets noticed.
-
The H/A thing I can agree with, certain mons are largely useless with their h/a. However I don't think that the suggestions of it not being rewarding or removing the pseudo legendaries make sense. World quest is planned to go on infinitely, with it happening on average every 200 hours. That means there is going to be a world quest every 9 days. World quest is already a very endgame thing, and it is it not a struggle to get the .5% at the moment. Having a legendary encounter every 9 days (even every 18 days if we say you dont get the .5% half of the time) I think would be extremely overpowered.
-
Auction house is already confirmed as a feature that is intended to be added in the near(ish) future. As it is stated in READ THIS BEFORE MAKING A SUGGESTION:
-
I am very much on team "keep limited items limited". However I think at the very least making these items tradeable for those who don't want them would be okay. I think if they go into the PvE store they should be twice the price you suggested, at 500. However, if we're going down this rabbit hole, i would sooner see new wings being created rather than trying to revive old ones. There was a flurry of wings being created with Giratina and Articuno and then Bug Catching introducing all the wings but there hasn't been anything since.
-
Nah. Should be random like every other encounter. Makes actual good shinies less rare. -1.
-
Closed. Traded in game.
-
*SOLD* Shiny Mamoswine (Thick Fat, Jolly 31 Speed)
Purplemauth replied to Paski's topic in Shiny and Special Pokémon - Silver
2.6 :D -
*SOLD* Shiny Mamoswine (Thick Fat, Jolly 31 Speed)
Purplemauth replied to Paski's topic in Shiny and Special Pokémon - Silver
2.3m ;) -
*SOLD* Shiny Mamoswine (Thick Fat, Jolly 31 Speed)
Purplemauth replied to Paski's topic in Shiny and Special Pokémon - Silver
2m -
Trying to enter that building on my other account it seems I cannot. Was i not supposed to get into the library? hahaha.
-
-
Bump. Start price lowered.
-
Bump
-
Title is self explanatory. The Coin shop has it, it should be implemented to other stores as well! (I will admit I did not check the PvE store so if it is implemented, i apologize) There's already space in the PvP shop menu to place it there, as I have edited the picture below to reflect. Would be very beneficial as PvP coins are much harder to get and buying one of these mounts is a reflection of countless hours of playtime.
-
To remove all challenging battles from the game? No. As it is, I think the trading requirement should be at 4 badges for every region. It doesn't make sense that you can trade immediately in the other regions.
-
Only have the encounter picture at the moment. It was quiet nature, with decent IV's. I'm happy. Now I have Pikachu and Raichu :)
-
Congrats! I was ev training yesterday and ran into a Valentines Raichu unexpectedly.