All Activity

bid is 100k. please do 701k or 801k no 750k

750k

start by nikhil

Start

startprice: 500k Time: 48h after startprice is met minraise: 100k cc=500k Insta: 2,5m 15 min rule active

start

Start Point/Price (S.O.): 100,000 Poké Dollars End Point: 48 hours after the first bid Insta-Buy (B.O.): 400,000 Poké Dollars Min. Raise: 50,000 Poké Dollars

Ty @Kvd

Hello @Eagles2k26, As there has been no further response and your question has already been answered, I will now close this thread. If you continue to experience any issues or have further questions, feel free to create a new thread. Cheers, Beacon

Selled Breloom at Kvd

start

up

start

bump

bump

bump

bump

start offer : 13m min raise : 300k insta price : 20m auction end : 2 days after 1st bid my accept : cc=450k , reroll ivs=650k

I’ve been thinking about a tournament structure built around a simple idea: You don’t have to play to take part, you can own a piece of a player through staking. The Core Idea (simple). Players can enter: On their own, or backed by others. Backers (friends, guild members, or anyone) can contribute pokedollars to a player and receive a percentage share of that player’s results. If the player wins or places, you get your %. If they don’t, your stake is lost. How Staking Works (examples). Ownership is based on how much you contribute relative to the total buy in. The examples below use a simple proportional model for clarity. Example: 1m Buy In 100k stake - 10% ownership 250k stake - 25% ownership 500k stake - 50% ownership 1m stake - 100% ownership (self funded) Example: 5m Buy In 100k stake - 2% ownership 500k stake - 10% ownership 1m stake - 20% ownership 5m stake - 100% ownership (self funded) Example: 10m Buy In 100k stake - 1% ownership 1m stake - 10% ownership 2.5m stake - 25% ownership 10m stake - 100% ownership (self funded) Note: These percentages are shown as a baseline model to keep things simple and easy to understand. In practice, final terms can be negotiated between the player and their backers depending on the situation. For example, a highly skilled player being backed into a tournament may agree on a slightly different percentage split. All that matters is that: The agreed ownership is clear upfront, terms are locked in before the tournament starts, payouts follow those agreed percentages. This keeps the system flexible, while still remaining fair and transparent for everyone involved. What This Allows. For players: They don’t need to fund everything themselves, they can be backed by a guild or community, strong players can compete at higher levels. For backers: You can participate without playing, you can choose who to back, you can own a piece of the action. Strategy Side. You decide how you want to approach it: Back one strong player for a bigger share, split across 2 to 3 players for balance, guilds can back multiple players and increase their chances overall. It becomes both: a competition for players, and an investment decision for backers. Following the Action. For those backing players, part of the appeal is the experience itself. You can follow your players live on Showdown (or on PRO, one day, if its possible), track their progress, and feel directly involved in every moment. Instead of just watching, you’re personally invested in the outcome, which adds an extra layer of excitement and engagement throughout the tournament. Fair Play and Integrity. Well...the big one. At the end of the day, this format is about individual competition with shared backing on the outside. Backing strong players and earning a share of their results is completely fine...that’s the whole point of the system. It’s meant to be simple: Support a player you believe in, and share in their success. Of course, with any competition, it’s impossible to control every edge case perfectly. The goal here isn’t to overcomplicate things, but to keep the environment fair, transparent, and competitive. So the expectations are straightforward: Players compete independently, backing stays outside the game, and everyone plays to win on their own merit. If anything questionable does arise, it can be reviewed and handled appropriately, but the intention is to rely on good faith and clear structure, not heavy restrictions. Bottom Line. Everyone agrees on stakes and % ownership before the tournament starts. Those percentages are locked in. Whatever a player wins gets split based on that, no confusion that’s it. What this is really about...this idea is just about making big tournaments more doable and more interesting for everyone. Players don’t have to carry everything on their own. People can get involved even if they’re not playing. Friends and guilds can back their strongest players, and everyone has a reason to follow the action. At the end of the day, it’s just: Back a player you believe in, and enjoy the ride. Simple, fair, and hopefully more exciting for everyone involved. Happy to hear any thoughts, feedback, or pushback as well...whether you like the idea or not, all input is useful.

S.O.=100K MIN BID= 50K AUCTION END= 24 Hrs After S.O. INSTA =1Mil