Speedy

Username: Speedy Server: Gold Country/Timezone: France / GMT+2

Instead of asking an unban it is pokemon as much creates an Uber tiers but this is not currently what is wanted I do not understand how we can ask for such a thing have you already thought a little bit before asking that?

Imagine i use a BMS for 3 day and after 6 hours the spawn change i will use HIGH JUMP KICK on my screnn

I find that some current spawn are already zero, for example the fossil spawn is unitile in pvp none is played I think we need to open up the top third pokes that are difficult to farm a little more, such as starters a little more often Is it possible to change spawns on fixed dates and via the RNG?

252 SpA Choice Specs Greninja-Ash Hydro Pump vs. 252 HP / 252+ SpD Azumarill in Rain: 189-223 (46.7 - 55.1%) -- 14.8% chance to 2HKO after Leftovers recovery 252 SpA Choice Specs Greninja-Ash Hydro Pump vs. 252 HP / 252+ SpD Azumarill: 126-149 (31.1 - 36.8%) -- guaranteed 4HKO after Leftovers recovery Or he can use spikes when you switch

French : Bonjour à tous je viens ici pour que l'on fasse bouger les choses au niveau du pvp, Ash gren est un gros problème actuellement pour la méta car c'est le Pokémon le plus rapide et aussi car il est bien trop fort pour la méta actuel, avec les Pokémons que nous avons actuellement ASH GREN peut tout détruire a l'exception de CHANSEY (sauf sous rain KAPPA) et POLIWRATH, je trouve que le Pokémons n'a rien a faire actuellement en PVP je ne pense pas être le seul. Je comprend que vous avez besoin de faire vivre votre jeu par la vente de CCS mais le soucis reste que vous avez fait des efforts pour attirer les gens en pvp et la vous détruisais votre travail par l'ajout d'un Pokémons, Je laisse les autres joueurs exprimer leurs avis mais je pense qu'il est impératif de faire un grand vote au seins de la communauté voir même de crée un conseil pvp qui décidera des bans a faire ou non, car actuellement c'est un drame. English (Google trad): Hello everyone I am coming here to shake things up at the pvp level, Ash gren is a big deal right now for the meta because it is the fastest Pokemon and also because it is way too strong for the current meta , with the Pokémons that we currently have ASH GREN can destroy everything except CHANSEY (except in the rain KAPPA) and POLIWRATH, I find that the Pokémons have nothing to do currently in PVP I don't think I am the only one. I understand that you have to keep your game alive by selling CCS but the concern remains that you have made efforts to attract people to pvp and destroy your job by adding a Pokemon, I will let other players express their opinions but I think it's imperative to make a big vote within the community or even to create a pvp council that will decide what bans to do or not, because right now it's a tragedy

think that the best is the solution of Gdarch, that is to say to have 50 different players qualified for the "ladder tournament" Is it possible and possible?

Forbid an account to make ladder on 2 servers as well as the "alt". @g3n3r4l

English with google traduction : I come here to open a discussion about the place of the ladder of the 2 servers. - 25 places per server - 50 places for the "ladder tournament" The problem for me are players who play on both servers and ladder it distorts the "tournament ladder". Moreover the interest is only financial already that I find that the access is restricted it is it even more by it is account present on 2 server The game community is not very large at the base you try to create a hype around PVP in this case only 1 account would have to be laddered on both servers. - This frees up space for other players on a server - Have more participation in the: "ladder tournament" I find at least 7 identical players between the two servers here are the screens at time T There are therefore 3 solutions: 1- Forbid an account to make ladder on 2 servers as well as the "alt". 2- Merge the servers to have a single one. (Impossible at present) 3- Do not change anything French : Bonjour, bonsoir. Je viens ici pour ouvrir une discutions par rapport au place du ladder des 2 serveurs. - 25 place par serveurs - 50 place pour le "ladder tournament" Le problème pour moi sont les joueurs qui joue sur les deux serveurs et font ladder il fausse le "ladder tournament". De plus l'intérêt est seulement financier déjà que je trouve que l'accès est restreint il l'est encore plus par c'est compte présent sur 2 serveur La communauté du jeu n'est pas très grande de base vous essayer de crée une hype autour du PVP dans ce cas il faudrait que seulement 1 compte soit ladder sur les deux serveurs. - Cela permet de libérer de la place pour les autres joueurs d'un serveur - Avoir plus de participation au : "ladder tournament" Je retrouve au moins 7 joueurs identique entre les deux serveurs voici les screen à l'instant T Il est existe donc 3 solutions: 1- Interdire un compte de faire ladder sur 2 serveurs ainsi que les "alt". 2- Fusionner les serveurs pour en avoir un seul même. ( Impossible à l'heure actuelle) 3- Ne rien changer

To have ivs lock rerolls you will have to pay a lot of cc KAPPA Otherwise it remains a good idea but unfortunately the lack of IQ of the commu will not change things

Username: Speedy Server: Silver Country/Timezone: France / GMT+2 or GMT+1

Also, staff is not looking for "Ban because is forbidden in showdown" comments, we want actual reasons (why it should be banned or why not, with sceneries for example). Like some persons did. If you want creat your metagame ban every pokemons with 50% usage on showdown like landorus

The bms are totally broken since the maj this morning

Won

1M7 by joguar