Samegaki

I want to buy untrained jolly nature, Shellder: Skill Link with 28+ Attack & Speed.

update: Found the NPC for my quest! I noticed that this quest have different walkthroughs.

I have a concern regarding of the NPC from Victini Quest. This NPC won't let me talk to him but I already found the 3 important messages for the prompt to pop-up for me to talk to it. I have been following a guide - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGDivelWAHU for this specific quest and met all of the requirements. These are the 3 important clue messages: P.S I checked the guide more than 5x and still have the same problem regarding the NPC.

start garchomp

230k

-1 As you said, what if they're innocent and mistakenly got banned. They are free to appeal and had a chance to do so to prove their innocence in https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/forum/36-discipline-appeals/. Public bans should be handled carefully, with clear evidence presented to the accused which I think Developers, Staffs, and Security have already compiled through careful monitoring of suspicious activity and irregular movements. For this scenario you gave, In my opinion, if person A bought a service to person B who used unauthorized software and manage to finish the service intended, got banned or banned early. They should make an appeal to prove that person A bought service from person B, clearly person A must attach evidence that he bought/request service for Developer, staff and security can check the said activity. It's not that they're trying to instill fear but this is a reminder that the game does not tolerate these kind of behaviour and take advantage of the game. Players are more likely to leave or lose interest if they feel that the game is overrun by cheaters. Banning these players helps preserve the game's integrity and keep its longevity.

Leveling service for @Manav861... done

EV service for @Smuglez... done price discount for Slytherins

Hello, I am writing this message because I noticed you copied my shop rule or notes from my service shop. Not asking to take it down, I would like to ask you to change it and make your own rules and not copy others (Samegaki and Nandish) or at least revise it to be different. That's all and thank you! here's mine (original): and yours:

Leveling and EV service for @Darkmaster269... done

Leveling service for Navg.... done note: payment has sent in advance. 10k remaining has been paid afterwards

Leveling service for Navg... on going note: player paid in advance with 10k balance. I will update this comment after the service is done.

bump

+1

Hello @Lyn1311, as you said you didn't bring your scyther, maybe discounted price price only works if you brought it with you.

bump

start volca 1

used and gave me disappointment instead of summer form P.S this is better than the other OCR farm tracker. Good work!

Boss Team no.1 is being lent by @Agz1... will be available again after 24hrs

+1 Agreed

I assumed it was coded to avoid this kind of issues. As per your agreement as a lender and borrower, if it was sent earlier than usual the payment will remain unchanged.

Hello! Norex gave a reply regarding the same issue. I will attach a screenshot of the reply. Thank you!

+1 / -1 Implementation of "Send back now" option in the lending tracker window which allows the lender to cancel their Pokémon if the user/borrower has been inactive may seem convenient, there are several potential downsides that I can think of: Lending Agreements - The current lending system is based on agreements between players, like a set time frame. If lenders could take back their Pokémon early, it could mess up the borrower's plans, especially if they're using the Pokémon for battles or quests. Unfair to Borrowers - Borrowers plan around the agreed lending period. If a lender can take back the Pokémon anytime, it could frustrate the borrower and cause issues between players. Repeated Lending and Recall - Lenders might abuse this feature by recalling Pokémon after the borrower has paid, causing confusion and potentially harming the game’s balance. This could also damage trust between players. Impact on Borrowers' Progress - If a borrower is using the Pokémon for a tough quest, suddenly losing it could disrupt their progress. Complications with Inactive Borrowers - It might be easy to retrieve a Pokémon if the borrower is inactive, but if they're just not responding or have turned off their status, this feature could be tricky to manage. In summary, while option provides flexibility to the lender, it could also cause several issues. Anyways don't mind me and my two-cent opinion

Hello @Nhokpies! I just want to remind you that it's past over 24 hours. @Heliolisk won Solosis and Yamask . For Larvesta and Goomy auction was won by @Stephanex1. P.S not a staff

start solosis