Smogonplayer

I think banning Kyurem would be a healthy move for the metagame. Some people may say "it beats stall, therefore it is good and shouldn't be banned". The argument that I'd like to share is Kyurem vs Balance and Bulky Offense. Despite being a great option for dismantling bulkier teams thanks to pressure, when combined with Roost it's fairly easy for a Kyurem to 1v1 pokemon such as Clefable simply by Subbing and Roosting and once it's health is low, switch out to another pokemon to scare Clefable out then pivot back in Kyurem to roost again and repeat the whole sequence, if you manage to do this 2 or 3 times it's over for most balance teams which utilise Clefable as their answer to Kyurem. But then think of Kyurem behind a sub, what switch ins are there? Steel types struggles to recover enough HP to resist constant Freeze Dry or Ice Beams in the late game, and pokemon such Tyranitar or fat water types like Slowbro, and Rotom-W are taking super effective damage from Freeze Dry and cannot withstand switching in constantly. Now you got to look into perspective of chess, a healthy piece is what can take one or 2 things but if a pokemon can take on multiple pokemon it is taking at least 1/3rd of the team. Which is bad, and unhealthy and uncompetitive. I think therefore, the correct move is to ban Kyurem and not to mention we got buffs such as snow, or and you know a pokemon is overpowered when it can 1v1 its checks and counters.

wrong chat

Hello, Can we have VGC format for PVP, it's better than singles, singles takes forever but doubles is shorter games. If we implement this, it will increase your skibidi toilet aura by 10,000 and let your scalds burn and your focus blasts hit. Don't fanum tax me because I am the rizzler. P.S: I am sorry I am a having the autistism. Thanks Thanks you.

OK idea.

Lol skill issue, just learn to play little bro. - 1000 aura.