Pvp point system

[Pispi13]

Hi,

I want to complain about the pvp point system. I think it is a bit unfair to match a 0 rating player when my rating is 300 over. I think silver server contains players enough for a better match making. I would rather wait a bit longer to find a better opponent than facing a 0 rating one and risk 40 rating or waste a long time in battle to get 3 rating. Also, why do we lose so much rating and earn so little? If I lose against a 0 rating player for example, I would need 5 or 6 wins to get my rating back (and would still probably be a bit less rating than what I had before losing).

I see a lot of people saying "I don't play pro anymore... too many stalls in pvp, win 1 get 10 rating, lose 1 lose 30". It kind of triggers a lot of players including me.

Maybe a better match making would solve the problem, or taking a bit less rating out when losing, specially in a game full of alts (people with high rating playing in low rating account for many forbiden reasons in game). We lack evidence so it is hard to report.

 

Thank you for your time.

Urs trully

 

Pepsi.

[Blazinswampert]

+1 higher ratings shouldn't be matched with 0 ratings who are mostly stallers and we lose more ratings then we gain +6 to -25 ratio isn't good tbh

[Benikisaki]

+1 the pvp match-up system is a complete mess

[Theakalli]

+1. This match making is a joke.

[Envymeister]

+1 ******* one, i believe we need a new system, revamp it! since pvp is one of the main points of the game, if you want to improve the game, u must improve what players plays most, and we pvp players are always forgotten ... first with some of the best moves bugged, then abilities uncoded, and especially a system that tilts all players

[Cobramk]

+1 lost -35 vs a 1 rating due to haxx and if i won only wins 2 rating, pls nerf ladder. :/

[Blindraven]

I agree, I dont play pvp often but I found a bit unfair to be matched with ladder players being a rookie .-.

[Imtrippin]

I agree on that you shouldn't be able to queue up vs players that have such a huge difference in rating, but I disagree on that you shouldn't lose more rating vs lower rated players and earn less as well. If you as a 300+ rated player beat a 0 rated player you should obviously get less rating than if you beat someone with 400. What I'm trying to say is that someone with 0 rating is either new/bad at pvp or hasn't started for the season. You shouldn't be able to farm easy rating vs low rated players like that. If anything is unfair then that would be it. So it's a good thing that the game rewards you more for beating higher rated players. Either way, I agree that the queue system should improve so +1 on that.

[Justcrown]

+1 actually because of the matchmaking i lost my whole willingnes to play the game and by the way the cooldown after disconecting is really dumb and unnecessary imo we should be able to play after dc on our own risk

[Fabion]

+1 to the idea!

I would rather wait a bit and find a player with similar rating as mine and even if I lose I could make it up easier than lose to a 1 rating dude and go -28, the worst part is that after that you gain 3-5 points each battle so yeah you kinda get it.

I hope to see a pvp system update soon in the future.