All Activity
- Past hour
-
Hello @Eagles2k26, As there has been no further response and your question has already been answered, I will now close this thread. If you continue to experience any issues or have further questions, feel free to create a new thread. Cheers, Beacon
-
-
start
- 1 reply
-
- 1
-
-
auction shiny rare timburr beautiful
Daicamax replied to Daicamax's topic in Shiny and Special Pokémon - Silver
up -
start
- 1 reply
-
- 1
-
-
Grabarz23 Shiny and Event shop (Update 5.9.25)
Grabarz23 replied to Grabarz23's topic in Shiny and Special Pokémon - Gold
bump -
bump
-
bump
-
bump
-
Lacomus started following Tournament Concept - Staking, Backing & Owning a Piece of the Action
-
I’ve been thinking about a tournament structure built around a simple idea: You don’t have to play to take part, you can own a piece of a player through staking. The Core Idea (simple). Players can enter: On their own, or backed by others. Backers (friends, guild members, or anyone) can contribute pokedollars to a player and receive a percentage share of that player’s results. If the player wins or places, you get your %. If they don’t, your stake is lost. How Staking Works (examples). Ownership is based on how much you contribute relative to the total buy in. The examples below use a simple proportional model for clarity. Example: 1m Buy In 100k stake - 10% ownership 250k stake - 25% ownership 500k stake - 50% ownership 1m stake - 100% ownership (self funded) Example: 5m Buy In 100k stake - 2% ownership 500k stake - 10% ownership 1m stake - 20% ownership 5m stake - 100% ownership (self funded) Example: 10m Buy In 100k stake - 1% ownership 1m stake - 10% ownership 2.5m stake - 25% ownership 10m stake - 100% ownership (self funded) Note: These percentages are shown as a baseline model to keep things simple and easy to understand. In practice, final terms can be negotiated between the player and their backers depending on the situation. For example, a highly skilled player being backed into a tournament may agree on a slightly different percentage split. All that matters is that: The agreed ownership is clear upfront, terms are locked in before the tournament starts, payouts follow those agreed percentages. This keeps the system flexible, while still remaining fair and transparent for everyone involved. What This Allows. For players: They don’t need to fund everything themselves, they can be backed by a guild or community, strong players can compete at higher levels. For backers: You can participate without playing, you can choose who to back, you can own a piece of the action. Strategy Side. You decide how you want to approach it: Back one strong player for a bigger share, split across 2 to 3 players for balance, guilds can back multiple players and increase their chances overall. It becomes both: a competition for players, and an investment decision for backers. Following the Action. For those backing players, part of the appeal is the experience itself. You can follow your players live on Showdown (or on PRO, one day, if its possible), track their progress, and feel directly involved in every moment. Instead of just watching, you’re personally invested in the outcome, which adds an extra layer of excitement and engagement throughout the tournament. Fair Play and Integrity. Well...the big one. At the end of the day, this format is about individual competition with shared backing on the outside. Backing strong players and earning a share of their results is completely fine...that’s the whole point of the system. It’s meant to be simple: Support a player you believe in, and share in their success. Of course, with any competition, it’s impossible to control every edge case perfectly. The goal here isn’t to overcomplicate things, but to keep the environment fair, transparent, and competitive. So the expectations are straightforward: Players compete independently, backing stays outside the game, and everyone plays to win on their own merit. If anything questionable does arise, it can be reviewed and handled appropriately, but the intention is to rely on good faith and clear structure, not heavy restrictions. Bottom Line. Everyone agrees on stakes and % ownership before the tournament starts. Those percentages are locked in. Whatever a player wins gets split based on that, no confusion that’s it. What this is really about...this idea is just about making big tournaments more doable and more interesting for everyone. Players don’t have to carry everything on their own. People can get involved even if they’re not playing. Friends and guilds can back their strongest players, and everyone has a reason to follow the action. At the end of the day, it’s just: Back a player you believe in, and enjoy the ride. Simple, fair, and hopefully more exciting for everyone involved. Happy to hear any thoughts, feedback, or pushback as well...whether you like the idea or not, all input is useful.
-
Sjoep joined the community
-
-
-
-
Zodiacfalls started following [Auction] Epic Clodsire H.A
-
Auction Details: Start Price: 100k End Point: 48H (after start price is met) Insta Price: N/A Minimum Raise: 100k Payments: Pokedollars, Coin Capsules (x1 Coin Capsule = 500k), IV Reroll Tickets (x1 IV Reroll Ticket = 750k) Important Reminders: This is a Silver Server auction. If bidding from an alternative server, state that you will transfer upon winning. If you intend to purchase with an alt account, specify the account alongside your bid. If a bid is received in the final 15 minutes of the auction, the end point will be delayed by 15 minutes from that bid, and will be delayed by 15 minutes for each new bid thereafter, until the current offer has been held for a full 15 minutes.
-
Zodiacfalls changed their profile photo
- Today
-
🔥 WTS – All Fools Pokémon 2026 🔥
Zexterr replied to Zexterr's topic in Shiny and Special Pokémon - Gold
Auction is Closed Now -
Hello @Demu96, As mentioned above, the moves in question are currently not available for Sneasler in PRO, even if they may be listed on external sources or outdated wiki pages. PRO does not always follow mainline movepools, and move availability depends on what is implemented in-game. If you believe the wiki information is incorrect or outdated, you are welcome to report it so it can be reviewed and updated. As there is no further action required from our side at this time, I will now close this thread. If you have any other questions, feel free to create a new thread. Cheers, Beacon
-
Rachel's Garden (Update 19/04/2026)
Rachelgardner replied to Rachelgardner's topic in Pokémon Shops - Gold
-
Hello @Bajnax, Thank you for your patience. After taking another look into your case, it appears that your Sinnoh Pokedex is still missing a number of required caught entries, which is preventing you from progressing with the Lake Trio quest. Please note that quest requirements have been updated over time. In particular, the Lake Trio quest now requires all non-legendary caught data for Sinnoh in addition to being Sinnoh Champion. (Pokemon Revolution Online) You can review the full list of updated requirements here: Content Update Logs Once you complete the remaining Pokedex entries, you should be able to proceed normally. Kind regards, Beacon
-
Very rare Chaos Emperor Dragon pvp mount
Artic replied to Pokeset1's topic in Coins & Items - Silver
8.5m -
Artic changed their profile photo
-
Why is this showing like this?can you help me out?
Beacon replied to Vicky9605's topic in Resolved General Support
Hello @Vicky9605, As mentioned above, the issue is due to incomplete Sinnoh Pokedex caught data, which is required to proceed with the Heatran quest. Once you complete the remaining entries, you should be able to continue without any issues. As there is no further action required at this time, I will now close this thread. If you continue to experience issues after meeting the requirements, feel free to create a new thread. Kind regards, Beacon -
New player having issues with Route 10 encounters
Beacon replied to Vashtenma's topic in Resolved General Support
Hello @Vashtenma, As your question has been answered and resolved, I will now proceed with closing this thread and moving it to the appropriate section. If you have any further questions in the future, feel free to create a new thread. Kind regards, Beacon