All Activity

Note: Auction ends in approximately 2 hours.

For some of these forms, players had to complete large quests that were time-consuming and exhausting. The reward was a form that was exclusive to that year, and that’s why I want to keep it that way. I wouldn’t be against making the old quests repeatable or adding new quests, but the rewards should be new forms or chromas instead of the old forms. But that’s something that falls more into the area of our content teams than mine, though.

I absolutely see the usefulness of this and agree that it’s a good idea. But it’s not that simple from a technical standpoint with how the Pokedex is currently implemented. It would require a bigger rework, and right now I just don’t have the time for that. I’m also not sure if I’ll have the time and motivation for it in the future.

1m by Ayuzh

Hi, we already made some changes in the past that will allow us to anonymize PvP matches in the future. This would only affect the opponent’s name, not their Pokemon. I feel like in this thread people were often talking past each other. As far as I understood, it’s only about usernames, not anonymizing the team itself. Team Preview and Enemy Team View will stay the same. The idea is just to prevent situations where you instantly know all of your opponent’s moves and preferred held items because a guildmate played them earlier. I do plan to implement this in the future, but priorities are currently elsewhere, so it may still take some time.

Hey, as you already said, the auction house is on my to-do list, but I haven’t worked on it yet. Right now, I’m reworking the storage system, which will also benefit the auction house since I can reuse the new filter system for it. It probably won’t be my focus for a while, since there are other projects I currently prioritize, like the server merge, multi-character accounts, and account variables. I do plan to implement an auction house, but it would be more like in Path of Exile, where trades still have to be done manually. I want to keep player interaction intact. The auction house would guarantee that the player actually owns the Pokemon/items and prevent trading until the auction is over, but it wouldn’t handle the trade itself. I’d like to comment on these mechanics first. I don’t have an issue with mechanics like IV rerolls or lootboxes, but only as long as they don’t involve real money. I think other games follow a different philosophy, which is why it’s so common there, in my opinion. I’m not a fan of the idea of changing the IVs of regular Pokemon. We allow it for Legendaries, because each player can only catch them once. That said, I do understand the frustration with forms and shinies. I have a few ideas that might help make things more tolerable in the future, but nothing concrete at the moment. But it'll definitely go in a different direction than you suggested. A quest helper is definitely planned, but most of the work for that will fall on our scripters. Right now, though, it’s not high on the priority list.

Note: Auction ends in approximately 7 hours and 30 minutes.

up

up

Another summer quest done! Minigamesx8, minigames boss, rockethideout quest, unovadex, crater town quest and victini dungeon. Thnx much, Glhf! Another summer quest done (GOLD)! Altomare/latis skin quest. Thnx much, GLhf!

ATTENTION: START PRICE CHANGED TO 12M

.

.

.

.

wtb

bump

bump

@Angeldumunzet auction end, let me know when you'r online and avaible to trade Ig : Victo Discord : Victohh

1m

1m1

Bump

1.4m

800k