Leaderboard

27m

Start 5m For Ninjask Min Bid 250k Left 48h Alfter First bid Ninjask Appect CC 400k RR 480k. Thank.

Start offer: 2.5m Min bid: 100k Duration: end 72 hours after first bid. Accepted Payments : •Coin Capsule : 400k/ea •IV Reroll : 500k/ea •Pokerdollars : $$$

2.5m azulmarill

1.9m azu

5.6m by: player00

1,401,000 azu

I give money away to random people until Astrella comes out. @C0mp

Sync failed, but 26 SPDEF + naive is equivalent to 07 SPDEF + jolly. (calculated for a level 100 medicham with : Pokemon Stat Calculator (Gen 3-9) (pycosites.com) ) Starting price : 1M Insta : N/A Minimum raise : +50k End point : 48 hours after starting price is met Accepted payments : pokedollars, coin capsules (1 cc = 400k) Important : If a bid is made in the last 15 minutes of auction, the ending point will be delayed by 15 min, until a full 15 min passed without any new raise. Good luck everyone

wtb venusaur h.a and hp fire Paying well pls show with prices

Start Point/Price: 1k each End Point: 24h after first bid Min. Raise: 10k each Accepted Payment(s): CC 400k each - RR 500k each Counter: https://www.webcountdown.de/?c=1706807520

@Sguzman97 You have been punished for False Offering - not having the means to honour your bid. Please read the Trade Rules and the Auction Rules. @Tite291190 @Defensive This is an awkward situation. Because the 450k bid was placed in response to the 400k bid - which turned out to be false. If nothing is done, Defensive loses out on 50k because his bid was influenced by the false one. And if the difference is returned to Defensive, then Tite291190 loses out on 50k. There would also be the concern about the start point of this auction not being from the false offer, but from Defensive's bid. But in my opinion and experience, reversing the trade to basically restart the auction would do you more harm than good. Decided to split the losses between the two of you and returned 25k to Defensive. If you both agree, I'm more than happy to reverse your trade so the auction can be restarted from Defensive's bid (which would be 400k). If this is your intention, please send me a private message to let me know. Apologies for the inconvenience caused by the perpetrator. Take care.

I online, now!

I give money away to random people until Astrella comes out. @Fafouney

i need my swiper please

3.15 m azum

3.1m azu

3m

2.85 m azumaril

2.8m azu

2.75 m azumarill

2.7m azumarill

2.55 m Azumaril

2m azu

if that would hp fire, that would stay next to it. It´s Grass

Bump

200k

start

1.8m azu

Start money in chitti123 and in this acc can transfer if needed

1.7 azulmarill

Greetings @Unbannedme Your End Point is not clear. Please edit your post to specify if your auction ends in "48 hours after Starting Offer is met" or "48 hours after thread's creation". Kind regards

120k

Start!

Greetings @Darksoul56, You have lended a Diggersby to Riyotakaa. Do you have more questions? Kind regards RockyRaccoon

Greetings @Spacerabbitx3 I have moved your thread to the proper sub-forum. Please take a look over General Trade Rules for a better understanding of how trade related sub-forums are supposed to be used. You are allowed a single Cross-Server auction at a time. Since Ninjask's one has started already, I have removed Shedinja from your post. Feel free to create a new thread to sell your Shedinja once Ninjask's auction is over. Kind regards

940k scraggy

26.2m

25m

20m

17m

16m

13m

9m6

Greetings, @Safadinha To clear up confusion on this: You must clearly specify on all auction threads(before they are started) whether the duration of the auction ends after XX:XX time after the threads creation or after the starting bid has been met. I hope this answered your question, Innerfocus

70k ralts

160k marill

@Leeluckya I am willing to buy your 13 event bundle pages. Please message me personaly in forms for some trade discussions

This will be fun! I hear many good thoughts around this matter and not only here in this thread. But there are also contrary to good here. I have been around for many many years in this game and have invested an insane amount of hours in creating Guilds that has been competitive. From time to time competition dies and me as a driven Leader makes new guilds just to get competition (always my old guild). - Making a 50 gap is a kinda weird concept if you want more people to be interested in pvp. This would bring 50 hardcore pvpers together and there would be no room for people to educate new players. What would be a much more functional Gap would be to limit the Guild activity joined. I see people moan about that the competitive genre is dying but they are also the people that is in the top guild on 2 servers contributing to less competition. Moving from Silver to Gold each season just to win on both sides. In my personal opinion after reviewing it all makes that complete hypocracy. Because if anything is contributing to dead competition it is that players are allowed to represent more than one guild. How can this be fixed? I am not personally a big fan of having one server instead of two but i do believe that if there is a possible way to take away the chance of joining more than one Guild that would be the most beneficial thing here. And of course same rule but for both servers. E.g If you join Enpire on Silver you are not allowed to join Defiant on Gold. 1 Guild per acc! - Guild Island! Yes, it is heavily needed to be fixed. I do not run with the "no1 hunts anyways" because that is clear BS. On the contrary I would say people are very much negative that it is not up running as it should. And i share that thought since that is legit the only thing you get out of being top 3... Well a trophy you won't see as well (maybe implement the trophy on trainer card). ^ ^ And instead of only fixing the Guild Island, maybe develop it? - Tournaments and Rewards! I would just simply suggest to make the Prize from Ladder Tour tradable again to raise interest in joining the tour! If you already have every poke and are proven a good PvP player, then why join? Maybe add something similar to Summer Tour but for Ladder players. E.g - Every players that has been participated in 2 or more Ladder Tours in a year will be able to register for a Yearly LAdder Tour around Christmas? Prizepool can be decided by staff obviously but the better reward the better tournament and amount of players you will have. And maybe, just maybe raising the Top 25 to a top 30 would make it a bit more interesting when it comes to monthly Ladder Tour registration. A few more pvp coin rewards left and right should not be to much of a problem - Clan Wars.. I am not very fund of this and I do not see how this would raise competition when all competitors are in the same Guild. Try to find other solutions to raise competition i would say. To sum up. - Keep 100 to make room for "pvp education". - Fix and develop Guild Island. - Add Guild Cloak, purchasable on Guild Island with Guild Logo on back. - Make it impossible to join more than one Guild with your account. Both Servers included! - Make Ladder Tour Pokes tradeable again. - Make an additional Tournament for Ladder Players only! Once a year! Much Love, GP

Hard disagree on the notion that you get to ladder easy, that it all depends on the mons you have and that there is a rich getting richer principle. If any pvp rewards need an upgrade, to be considered worth the effort that goes in. If you can't hack it, it means you are not good enough, didn't invest enough time in improving your craft. Of course it is easier if you are a littler smarter. Same goes for guilds. Not like you make those and it is smooth sailing after that. It has a lot to do with good community work. So instead of blaming those guilds that can actually make it work, maybe focus on yourselves and improving. That being said, a clan wars system, automated tournaments, small rewards for playing pvp etc. all would lead to improvemnt. Personally I don't like the idea of making the guilds smaller and would rather focus on growing the game/ its player base - aswell as making pvp more attractive. Fixing Guild Island would be a great start.