Okay first thing, we cannot exactly complain about the spawn rarity if we do not know the spawn rarity. I understand what Qeight suggested is an upgrade according to him and the rest of the staff and there is nothing wrong with that , but that doesn't leave much room for criticism now does it? The rates have always been obscure to the player base so we really cannot complain about that even if we wanted , I'm pretty sure shadow buffs / nerfs to spawn rates happen all the time without players knowing .
The concept of this topic in itself is flawed , no offense but you're just trying to give us the illusion of having the freedom to criticize this topic . By this , I do not mean that the staff are using manipulative tactics , but literally no one in the player base has enough experience to be able to criticize Qeight's work . Unless he messed up with something BIG TIME , no one's opinion is more valuable than his opinion seeing how much he worked for this game , the efforts are much appreciated.
But , what we can criticize is how poorly this was handled , its all summed up in what @makeitwitchu said earlier and what was deleted , which brings up my next point.
I'm sorry you say transparent feedback , but how is it transparent feedback if constructive and valid criticism it's locked behind General Complaint Area . What kind of president has a private meeting with a news reporter about to interview him , and then all what was said is classified information?
Yes this is true but arguments and feedback build upon each other. My arguments might be flawed , but they might be complement by the next person's argument. I might have missed an important point but another person might use my ideas as a basis for building a stronger thesis.
At this point pro's community is like a miniature society. And you cannot have a society without having the press and the media. What you're doing is isolating the press and the media from the people , whose sole job is to represent the people .
I understand that disrespectful and rude comments deserve to be deleted and punished , but what @makeitwitchu said earlier was on point. It's not off topic , it was spot on. He did not criticize or undermine the job the staff team or Qeight did , he just criticized the way this whole situation was handled , and what better place to do it than on the topic itself?
As a last note , no offense , but a society cannot work if the judge , the jury and the executioner are all handled by the same entity.