Saintebaguette
Registered User-
Posts
205 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Saintebaguette last won the day on September 19 2019
Saintebaguette had the most liked content!
About Saintebaguette
- Birthday 10/08/2000
Personal Information
-
Career
student
-
Gender
Male
Recent Profile Visitors
Saintebaguette's Achievements
Junior Trainer (3/12)
103
Reputation
-
Lets talk together about Staff & Player relationship !
Saintebaguette replied to Shinohara's topic in General Game Talk
Actually, not my case, i react for the MERITS of the questionings, not gor personal thoughts, so all that doesnt include me, i defended your work as staff, but agreed with the merit of others concerns, im not affected by your behavior, but doesnt mean i cant listen to others ecoeriences and give valor to the merit of saying their thoughts. I dont need to know someone to criticize or not their work, i need to be objective and not subjective as i said, regarding of spawn editor, your work is exemplar, i wasnt personatelly affected by you, so i cant say anything about your work as GM, i can ofc pounctuate that your behavior in pro discord with others are sometimes less than expected or desirable of a leadership role (the hkw u answer back some ppl) which is different of how you handle appeals/bans/punishments. Again, behavior, not work. I did 3 constructive critics, 2 defending you and pointing my thoughts regarding some stuff i dislike. Im not wondering why you keep being a GM went back, front, left or right, u have your reasons, none of my business, tho i see as masochism. Must important is see the feedbacks and improve yourself from now on. If you dmed me about something like that you KNOW i would be sincere with you. But i cant cover my eyes and oretend i do not see what is happening. Cya, keep moving foward -
Lets talk together about Staff & Player relationship !
Saintebaguette replied to Shinohara's topic in General Game Talk
Big shoutout to @Ehkoe, i love how she treat us players, how cheerful she is and set an example of good relationship between players and staff, many can say this is a "simp", but heck it, is a simp, cause she is adorable and i love her. -
Lets talk together about Staff & Player relationship !
Saintebaguette replied to Shinohara's topic in General Game Talk
The thing is about the behavior, not about his work. The posts about it are about how he speaks, his work is very good and needed for the community, people criticizing his WORK, mostly can be banned/heavily punished, but the behavior have a merit in the critic. We all have different experiences with different people, we can't generalize our opinion with everyone else. I have a good relationship with Felix (he blocks me and unblocks me every 3 days after i annoy him), but i can only say that for myself, if others show evidences, i have to see the facts (like i do). So clearly have a mistreatment issue that need to be WORKED ON. I recommend reading former staff Chris post for example. -
Lets talk together about Staff & Player relationship !
Saintebaguette replied to Shinohara's topic in General Game Talk
I mean, is not like the post is about her behavior, to "move on" people should drop the bone of disliking the person and keeping attacking and focus on the thread. (you guys are just showing her points lol) It's better to let staff handle this in a more private issue or this will be just a public shaming of 2 sides. Regarding of the WQ, i TOTALLY agree with @Fafouneyand @Pinklax, the WQ was a failure, the intention was good, but the amount of iv was a shot of bazooka in the feet. I believe most players lost even more motivation (the ones that wasted 3-4hours). I recommend to put the testers to go for the 0,55 needed before each WQ, i know there is a randomizer, but i believe this can help to avoid stuff like "unfair spawns" and avoid situations where everyone need to dedicate 3hours to find 2 pokes. -
Lets talk together about Staff & Player relationship !
Saintebaguette replied to Shinohara's topic in General Game Talk
Patreon have it's own measures of age verification, as you stated "her social media", "her Discord", she is not obliged to follow Pro Discord guidelines, since as the rules states "stuff outside pro discord isn't taken in consideration". If she was to blame on that, several staves would have to suffer punishment for racism jokes, homophobia, xenophobia, +18 publications. The difference, is that her work is that, to subscribe on patron you need age verification, if the person lies on it, their parents are the one to blame. The players see that reflection a lot, and many like belzebel and sometimes even mylself I suggest making a "battle frontier", its a gen3 feature that still existed till Unova. Endless battles with some rewards, something to keep players busy without CD "Ah but we cant make another coin, or give tons of rewards, will ruin economy". No one did Emerald game from the start till the end just for the items, but to reach battle frontier, remember, back in the time, was common 50-60h + playing, just to reach the endgame, the rewards were terrible, but still, was fun. I talked to @Walrosskastanie @Cames and they loved the idea (and told me to post as suggestion) so its kinda my fault. but its an example, pvE players want something to do over and over that is not hunting pokes or doing bosses once a week, regardless of the reward. Totally agreed, players don't care if you are you, the moment you speak, using a staff role, you're representing Pro Staff, the higher your position, the heavier the weight of your words, that affects directly players. @Qeight, mostly of players don't have the SLIGHTEST idea of what you do, that's a fact, we (i speak for myself and probably for some staffs(i guess?)) know the importance of your work and u do an amazing job, for real, your work is essential, but you need to communicate to players more, show how the improvements you did will improve their game life, why you did X thing or why u haven't done Y thing. The excitation you throw in your work, you need to hype us too. I know is tiring some times, but players want to understand. The critics about you here, are the reflection of that, u get so tired of so repetitive questions and stuff that you get pissed and all go downhill. Like i said in a previous post, an amazing example that you listen to players was when i dmed you asking a furfrou spawn, and you totally did it. That relationship player x staff was amazing for me, same when i suggested another spawn and you said NO and why, u showed another point of view i didn't had and i totally agreed. I believe most players want that. Don't take the critics here as a personal attack, but as something that should/could be fixed. Thanks for reading this. -
Lets talk together about Staff & Player relationship !
Saintebaguette replied to Shinohara's topic in General Game Talk
Let staff answer her, u're making unnecessary drama, the post is a communication between PLAYER X STAFF, not player x player. Take the arguments to a dm or something, i understand u want to show your point, but, doing that u're only contributing to a drama that will get bigger and bigger, her complaint is directed to staff, let staff answer her. As a player, same as me, we don't have the full view, her view can be one-side based, but it's her view, and staff can respond accordingly. Don't reply player posts, do as Keita oriented in the FIRST POST of this, this thread is to say what u feel take out doubts, give a feedback. Nothing else. Thanks for reading till here, no need to answer me back, leave this thread for staff to answer each one. -
Lets talk together about Staff & Player relationship !
Saintebaguette replied to Shinohara's topic in General Game Talk
World of Warcraft, the community made the whole staff change Feral Druid multiple times, by just saying it's unbalanced/broken, Made Rogue Assassination skill be removed since the rogue could basically stay areal forever as long as he does the proper rotation Made Mage Frost damage getting lower since it was giving slow/freeze + high dps Made Death knight Blood lose it's worms that made it immortal. Reduced paladin Bubble CD time, etc.. Tera the community made the staff correct the scythe class because was dealing too much damage with minimum effort + life leech Made the staff nerf the Lancer damage output, since it was purely an immortal tank with infinite mitigation and high damage on pvp. Overwatch, everytime the community makes the staff change damage/ CD of certain charactes that are unbalanced Elders Scrolls Online every Wednesday they fix unbalancing, add community chosen items that were removed, remove updates that got a negative feedback. Those are 4 of the greatest MMORPGs ever made, of a staff that listen to the community feedback, all those games have 6 years + and they manage to attract the player base every time by listening to the community. -
Lets talk together about Staff & Player relationship !
Saintebaguette replied to Shinohara's topic in General Game Talk
For u guys, STOP using this thread as a chat, post your damn complain/ doubt/suggestion and get out. The post is to give a FEEDBACK to the staff, not to chat if you like or not @Qeight, state points, say what the staff actions u see as inappropriate and how to improve that. THAT IS A FEEDBACK. You want staff to change? BE CLEAR, BE DIRECT, BE RESPECTFUL. You can't the post is about suggestions to improve the relationship staff x players, it's not a "kick this staff cause we dislike him/her/it" Don't go using "We this" "We that" not everyone thinks the same as you, speak for yourself, and staff will understand. Look at my post, i DID criticize @Qeight behavior to some people, but, have you guys ever stopped to talk to him something about a spawn? About an issue? (not ordering around, but seeking orientation?) I usually do and he was always respectful, when i did that ( you know furfrou spawn in sinnoh? I asked him that, we didn't had furfrou spawn) That is the feedback kind staff is hoping for, WHERE they can improve, WHERE they can correct issues. Don't ruin this opportunity, this thread is not a joke, it's not a chat. Want to criticize him? Name him, say where, what and when. This is not a "i was banned unfairly cause i'm innocent". Just make an APPEAL saying "I want a staff other than Qeight to review my case". Staff decisions are made in a whole, but yeah, he will be involved because he will prove his point between other staffs and discuss about your case BETWEEN THEM. Before u say i'm licking staff balls, most of them have million reasons to perma ban me, being their personal issues with meor due to my own behavior. And yea, most of the issues i got, i asked orientation to them, if wasn't Qeight, keita and others talking to my nemesis, i wouldn't even be able to chat anywhere in Pro. Know what each staff do, ask orientations, do appeals, Annyway, there are MULTIPLE ways to get your case reviewed. Don't turn this opportunity into a mess, this is serious, u can't ask change if you don't change. Another suggestion, @Eaty i need more colors in this chat that match, please i want to make a rainbow in my post. (i don't care about your eyes) love ya -
Lets talk together about Staff & Player relationship !
Saintebaguette replied to Shinohara's topic in General Game Talk
Concern First of all, thanks for letting us share our concerns, i'm going into the obvious one, the treatment between certain staffs and players. We all know that how Qeight treat us players with incredibly rudeness, the issue is not just that (as if being treated like [heck]/dumb and other insults towards the community was small thing), but sometimes we see in pro discord ban threats. As far as i imagine, this is totally unacceptable, the lack of respect when someone does a question about something they DON'T UNDERSTAND, it's apparent, i will say that for myself, but every time i see this happening, i feel less and less motivated to speak in pro discord or even play pro. i'm a 2k +hours player and the fear of being punished (banned) because i said something a staff disliked it's bigger than my will to play. Another concern, but also a suggestion would be, don't let staff, being in game or discord that had troubles with certain players, to give their "opinion" about an infraction. That is totally based on emotion therefore, makes the judgment clouded and personal instead of technical. For a GM, the infraction can be a 2 hours mute, to the one with grudge will be worth of a ban, I myself was almost victim of that kind of judgment, and it's totally not fair. Suggestion 1- Allow players to vote about the behavior of certain moderation to ensure the staff will hear us in a faster way, like an instant open public feedback. 2- Do something about not only users but moderators, that pretend that do not see offenses, homophobic comments, body shaming comments, xenophobic (offense towards ethnic groups) comments. 3- Punish the ones that provoke severely and a small warn to those who DEFEND themselves. We're often seeing the attacked ones being punished for defending their honor. 4- Try to stop the "protection culture" where, a staff says the complaint of a player towards another member of staff is wrong, if one player expressed it's concern usually there are many others who agree but don't have the courage to do so. 5- Put a recruitment based on minimum Age (hard to do but it's about free time and maturity). Thanks :RemVV:- 298 replies
-
- 20
-
Can i expect less than 10 years?
-
Why the "PvP Council" is a failure and how we can fix it!
Saintebaguette replied to Teerav's topic in PvP
I believe pvp council, instead of 7, should be way more than that. Reason: To avoid maintaining a stall meta or keep the pvp stagnant. The more opinons, the best, i heavily suggest that the "chairs" in the council, should not be stable, this way, we can keep for example 8 stable chairs, (top 4 ladder both server) and the "contestants", why? Because new strategies should be implemented, imagine if you have 2/3 of the server wanting i don't know, Mawile for example, because counters the top 10 ladder, naturally the ones against mawile will be usually the ones who will struggle a lot. More opinions will avoid the pvp to be only 3 teams with same moves. Think about it, in pvp chat we have usually "you need speed 31 in case someone put an azu or a if your poke is 30 and the opponent is 31 speed". This shows that players are LESS motivated to try new stuff because they lack options. What is the point of having new pokemons if they'll be banned right away? As someone said, imagine farming a poke tirelessly for end up being banned. We want a balanced pvp, mixed where someone can risk using a simple bidoof and batom pass(example), and not chansey, clefable... and the rest your mind already figure out the rest. The council should indeed have more decisive power, but, however, every way, the players also should have a chance to have voice on it and when i mean players, i mean, not only the council. I believe that making a poll after decisions for the community to vote is essencial. Why would 7 decide for 1k? -
denied Donaten/paying a fine to PRO as an unban method
Saintebaguette replied to Agencyneverdies's topic in Suggestions
-1 because heck capitalism riches needs to get rekt -
-1 I like @iceflakethat's why ash sucks btw.
-
-1, first, would if same person wins twice in a roll or in a short period of time, everyone will complain. second, will make the game a casino wich is not cool.
-
-1 but +1 I think bosses need to be rebalanced BUT with restrictions, ban multiple sharpedos and prevent them too using megas, 400 ev's is more than enough