All Activity

I have DMed you check your messages.

Hello, I’m contacting you because I’m unable to start the Latios Quest. I have completed all the requirements, including catching Jirachi and fulfilling the other requirements, but the quest still does not start. I suspect that there might be a bug, because I completed the Summer Latios Quest before this. Maybe this is preventing the normal Latios Quest from starting. Could you please check if there is an issue with my account or if completing the Summer Latios Quest could cause this problem? Thank you for your help! Best regards

Hello! You're welcome! Since we have resolved this issue, I will proceed to close this thread If you need any assistance in the future, please create a new thread Kind regards. Hallowglow.

Thanks

Hello! The Tree Axe has been recovered. This was not caused by a bug, was an error when sending the item by mail. Please be more careful in the future to avoid this happening again. Have a great day! Kind regards. Hallowglow.

May I please have this one restored, I accidentally deleted it when I was cleaning my box.

Quest service Mega lopunny, crater town quest and victini dungeon. Thnx much, Glhf!

Hello @1villain Usernames are permanently reserved once registered. This applies even if the account is later banned, the name cannot be reused for a new account, and it cannot be reassigned to an existing account via rename, even with coins. Ban status does not change this. If your account is banned, you can appeal the ban, and a staff member will review it.

Supporting new players❌ 🚽ing on inexperience players✅ youre not a nice person alberdo, just showing face for your little trade business. stop pretending my friend is stuck in the story because of you and i cant give them the pokemon Im new, this is not an alt

Ready to take orders now, customers!

Update: I've expanded on my second point after @Godredeye and @Magikarpsh raised the point about other assets (what else counts towards a player's available balance). I've added to my original answer to cover that and better explain what I meant about preventing players from bidding more than they actually have.

I’m big +1 on the transfer responsibility thing However about money it’s not as straightforward as it seems because as Godredeye said, you could have more money stashed on alt account / borrow from friends / Pay with CC’s and that would not show up in your actual bidding account balance (+ reading rules may not be that obvious for the whole community, it sounds like common sense that you should not bid money you don’t have 👀)

+1

i know how to change name read full message otherwise you don't know so don't answer

+1 and -1. I understand your point, and I think the first suggestion is reasonable. However, I don't think the second suggestion is possible to implement fairly. Let's say I bid 100m on a Pokémon. I may not personally have 100m in cash at that moment, but does that mean I can't afford to buy a Pokémon for 100m? Not necessarily. For example, I could borrow from friends—Laco might have 10m, Norex 50m, and Yauga 40m. Together, that's enough for me to complete the purchase. I could also have money on an alt, or hold my wealth in items such as CC, RR, RC, or other valuable items that I can sell. Because of this, it's very difficult to accurately determine a player's actual worth based solely on the money they currently have available.

I have two suggestions that I think could make auctions clearer for players and potentially reduce work for Trade Moderators. 1. Making transfer responsibility more visible This first suggestion is more of an idea in theory than something I strongly feel needs to change. Personally, I'm perfectly happy with keeping the Cross Server section as it is. The only reason I bring it up is because players don't always read the auction rules consistently, particularly the rules explaining who has the responsibility to transfer in a Cross Server auction. If everyone took the time to read and understand those rules, then there really wouldn't be much of an issue. In practice, though, we know that not everyone does. Some players may see "Cross Server" and simply understand it as meaning that offers are accepted from both Gold and Silver. What they may miss is the additional responsibility regarding who has to make the transfer once the auction ends. So, purely as an alternative idea, perhaps the forum could keep just the Gold and Silver auction sections, which would indicate where the Pokémon is currently located, and then make transfer responsibility part of the visible auction details. Transfer responsibility: Buyer / Seller This could appear alongside the usual Start Price, Minimum Raise, Insta Price, Duration, etc. That would make the arrangement immediately clear without requiring someone to already know what the Cross Server rules say. The Gold/Silver section tells bidders where the Pokémon is currently located, while the transfer field tells them exactly who is responsible for moving servers. Anyone considering bidding can then make their own assessment about whether the auction is worth participating in based on the Pokémon's location and whether they would personally need to transfer. Again, I'm not necessarily suggesting that Cross Server needs to be removed. I'm happy with how it currently works when the rules are understood. My only reason for raising the idea is that we can't realistically expect every player to read every rule consistently. Making something as important as transfer responsibility visible directly within the auction details could prevent confusion before it happens. 2. Prevent players from bidding more than they actually have My second suggestion is more of a development/coding issue and may only be something that can be considered further down the line. Ideally, players should only be able to place auction bids that they can actually afford. If there were some way for the forum auction system to communicate with the dashboard/account system and check a player's available balance, a bid could automatically be rejected if the player attempts to bid more than they currently have. For example, if a player has 1m available and attempts to bid 1.1m, the system simply wouldn't accept the bid. However, this shouldn't be limited to a player's Pokédollar balance, as they may have other assets available to make up the value of their bid, provided those payment methods are accepted under the auction contract. Taking recognised alternative payment methods into account as well. If things like Coin Capsules, IV Reroll Tickets and other commonly accepted forms of payment were tracked against an account, their value could be calculated based on the value of each set out in the auction contract. That way, when someone places a bid, the system could calculate their overall available value rather than looking at Pokédollars alone. Example: Lacomus - 5.000.000 - 2026-09-08 09:52:36 (4m Pokédollars + 2 Coin Capsules at 500k each = 5m total). If a player intends to place a bid using Pokédollars alongside another asset, they can select the relevant checkboxes for Pokédollars, Coin Capsules, IV Reroll Tickets, and other eligible assets, then enter the exact amount of each asset they wish to include. Before the bid is submitted, the system verifies that the player has the specified amounts available and automatically checks the calculation to confirm that the total bid value is sufficient. Once validated, the bid is submitted with a complete breakdown of the transaction, stating each asset and quantity included in the bid. It gives the seller information on what they would be receiving and how the bidder intends to make up the value of their bid, making things clear from an informational perspective when it comes time to complete the transaction. I'm not sure how practical that level of integration would be technically, or how difficult it would be to implement. It would prevent invalid bids at the point they're made rather than leaving Trade Moderators to deal with the consequences afterwards. Update (08/09/2026): I've edited and expanded on this idea, as I didn't go into it as thoroughly as I could have originally, to cover all bases in terms of what players may have available across their total assets and how that could be calculated. The downside is that taking all of this into account would make the coding and the way the system checks and calculates a player's available assets more complicated, but it was just an idea.

Buy coins with real money

(bump) 1 another question question if my any account have there have name example - abcd1234 so if its ban so how i change there name because i want my name to my new account ! its possible??

The tracker is as cool as you! 😎

Hello! I'm sorry for the inconvenience. I'll forward your request to the appropriate team for review. Please be patient, we will provide you with more information once we have an update. Kind regards. Hallowglow.

Hello! Due to inactivity, I will proceed to close this thread If you need any further assistance in the future, please don't hesitate to contact us again Kind regards. Hallowglow.

Hello! Due to inactivity, I will proceed to close this thread If you need any further assistance in the future, please don't hesitate to contact us again Kind regards. Hallowglow.

Hello! Due to inactivity, I will proceed to close this thread If you need any further assistance in the future, please don't hesitate to contact us again Kind regards. Hallowglow.

@Fazko91 Just wanted to add that every day, there will be a roll to choose one Pokémon that all players can hunt without needing MS, in a specific spot. The spot will be only in the event island tho. Right now, it’s Sobble - Alto mare.