Gdarch

Iv speed 29+ 5m budget depending on ivs

Player name: GDarch Showdown name: GDarch Server: Silver Timezone: GMT+2 Rank on ladder: 11

+1 It’s obviously a very good idea. To be honest, I would really like to hear staff explaining why this was and still is a bad idea to put this kind of reroll into the game...

8cc

Start

I suppose that you are the kind of guy who could throw banana to a black player because this is how sport is, full-on war.... We all know that people are far from of only saying "I 6-0'd a noob"....

Player name: GDarch Showdown name: GDarch Server: Silver Timezone: GMT+2 Rank on ladder: 5

It is not because the Internet has trivialized this kind of verbal abuse that on PRO it should also become the norm. Do you know about diffamation, people could actually makes PRO responsible for not taking care seriously about those cases. You talk about sports man, I don't know lot of sports that allow athletes to insult each other, at least in tennis bad behaviour is punished (I don’t know the sport you practice).Because it is clearly about that here, if for you to belittle someone is part of the sport I think that you still need to practice a lot to finally understand what the true values of sport are...

Simply because moderators are rarely in game, to see how bad players can be with each other and even if toxicity is already punished by PRO, the current policy seems to not be harsh enough to get rid of that.

Everyone loses yep. Should we make fun of them like this : ? NO.

What G3n pointed out is something staff should have taken into consideration in the battle code. Lots of bugs are reported by players, they should code something preventing players from using bugged and bannable moves since after having battled with bug abuser players, you don't recieve any kind of compensation for your report (for example, they could cancel the drop of rating due to the battle you have lost against them...). Having pvp anonymity will require those upgrades in the battle code, what is very good for PRO in my opinion.

The truth is that a defeat should never be embarrassing in any way but youtubers like to « expose » others by acting like they were some kind of talented invincible pvp player, what is clearly not the case...

I like this idea because it can prevent players from taunting each other (what is an issue PRO struggles to deal with since most part of the time there are no moderators online...), it can also permit to limit opponent teams leaks (what I feel is good for pvp).

End it on July the 1st. Extending the current season makes no sense from a competitive point of view.

I'm ok with that.

6cc

ok

If you accept cc I offer 5cc

Player name: GDarch Showdown name: GDdarch Server: silver Timezone: gmt + 2 Rank on ladder: 18

User : GDarch Server : Silver Country / Timezone : France , GMT+2

To complete what you said we must add that Manaphy was Uber in BW. And as PRO is somewhere between BW and X/Y I think it should have been banned for having forced the meta to play around ferrothorn/rotom wash/ unaware clef because of rain teams. Regarding Landorus with Sheer Force, it’s true that PRO environment (uturn doesn’t work properly, godly iv hard to obtain for common mortals etc) makes it difficult to be compared to the threat it was on showdown but do we have to wait for someone to find the good compo to expose how broken it can be on PRO ? Because our meta already manages to deal with it by using weavile as revenge killer or strong priority from azumarill and mamoswine does it really mean this is healthy for the meta ? I tought a good reason for banning a pokemon was how he limits team building. For me this is definitely the case with landorus sheer force.

Wtb at least 20 reroll iv tickets.

I can’t agree more than that !!!

What about the need to put pp up after loading a set ? Wouldbit be possible gor the set master to save the pp up we already put on each attack ?

Hello, the set Master is a really good idea but we have to put again and again the pp up for each attack after loading a set. We dont have unlimited number of pp up. This NPC needs to be redone in order to take into account pvper who can switch a lot between sets. Come on, think a little bit before doing something.