5tryker

A staff member called several players stupid and idiots, as described in several posts here... And after that, he spent a whole night on Discord making fun of the people who are posting here. Is this type of posture allowed? @Shinohara

The person just thinks it's okay to call others stupid and idiot. Need to say something else?

I think he didn't want to quote you but the Q8 who posted something and deleted it.

Aside from all the arguments already used, this will clearly increase the amount of games going on at the same time. +1

bump

bump

bump

Your DS dont work. Add-me Stryker#1707

bump

Still available? Call me. Stryker#1707

Helo! I am interested in contracting the service. Full story + metro and teleport and mega bracelet. Call me on Discord. Stryker#1707

bump

Fala Nyong! Te adicionei no Discord, assim que possível me aceite lá, ou caso tenha dado algo errado, me add Stryker#1707. De todo modo, seja bem vindo, como você bem sabe, a guild é totalmente focada em PvP e é ideal que os membros se esforcem até o dia 20 ter pego o rating necessário por conta dos planejamentos pela briga do TOP LADDER GUILD mensal. No mais, quando nos falarmos te passo melhor os detalhes.

bump

bump

Link broken =S

Auction canceled due to lack of offer.

Welcome Slowly!

Player name: 5tryker Server : Silver Timezone : GMT -3

Man, first, what a wonderful text. You don't know how important it is to have this view, of how Staff members think like players. I hope that more posts like this happen. ------ About PvP I have played Pokémon since its first game launched, if I'm not mistaken, 1996. The Pokémon competition started around 2006/2007, but it gained strength even in 2008. And it has always been so, always with a list of Pokémon appearing repeatedly in the competitive landscape. I think this is not an evil that affects only the Pokémon franchise, but in any game that has a competitive side, always the same weapons, always the same builds... Looking at the present, today the official Game Freak format, VGC, every season alternates its rules, in a way, the goal constantly undergoes changes, perhaps that is why many players prefer VGC to Smogon. Perhaps a season system where the rules are constantly changing? As an example, a season where only monotypes are allowed to set up? I do not know. It is really difficult to establish something like that, as well as to develop something in that sense. And on that, congratulations to the entire team for developing the random battle mode. About PVE Diancie's quest, the famous '' chess '', that is SENSATIONAL! This is the type of PvE content that draws attention, and that escapes the same "conversation with one npc here, battle, conversation with another npc there, battle ...". May more creative quests like this arise. As a note, many players fail to enjoy the game's PvE content simply because they do not know English, since a requirement to be able to enjoy this content is to read and understand the existing dialogues. Allow yourself to create a game translation project, where the community can contribute to it. You do not need to translate the game into all the existing languages, but to the most common among the average PRO players. Recruit translators, I'm sure many players would love to do this work on a voluntary basis. Number of Accounts I understand how complicated it is to limit that. And perhaps having allowed 4 accounts is a way of no return. But I am in favor of only 1 account per player. Perhaps a way to reverse this would be to announce the limitation '' today '' and give players 6 months to organize themselves. Whatever the number of accounts allowed. About the Economy Competitive PvP will always dictate where the game economy goes. That will never change. But here comes a criticism, what happened recently cannot happen. Ban X Pokémon without simply having a preparation for it. This breaks the economy. However, it is just an observation. But why does PvP dictate the rules? First, it is the preferred mode of play for most players. Competition is part of the human instinct. And second because it pays the best prizes. Could PvE have a role in this? Yes, it could, but it is not simple, looking at the development aspect, the technical aspect itself. But how? There are several games where players compete against each other, without necessarily being a PvP, a battle. If there were some ranked puzzles, it would be necessary to use certain pokémons, and that it would also pay rewards as good as the PvP rewards. But I repeat, it is extremely complicated to establish this, because first, a lot of creativity and second, a lot of development effort. ---- Finally, again, congratulations on the text.

I'm a little worried. The Council's Discord is quiet, without any discussion. Is there something going on behind the scenes? This topic is full of very productive opinions, it would be very sad that all this was disregarded. = /

+1 for this.

Auction ENDED! Winner is YashX1 [1.7m]!

Bump Time to the end: 30 min.

You did not understand. The problem is not to ban these Pokémon. The whole point is that there is a Council, where its function is to carry out the necessary tests to keep PvP balanced. However, these bans were not based on the Council's tests and were exposed by Teerav. This is the point. It is a fact that the position of the Staff is VERY complicated, many tasks to be done and many problems to take care of. That is why a Council was created, if it was created, to respect it and let the Council work.