All Activity

Hello, I’m having an issue with a progress rollback after the game crashed. I had successfully defeated the entire Johto Elite Four at the Indigo Plateau and continued playing afterward. While I was inside a cave, the game suddenly crashed. When I logged back in, my progress had been rolled back to before I defeated the Elite Four. The problem is that the rollback was not complete: the money I had spent on items (including Hyper Potions) was not restored, even though my Elite Four progress was removed. So I lost the progress of defeating the Elite Four, while still losing the money I had spent preparing for and completing those battles. Could you please check my account/server logs and see if my Elite Four progress can be restored, or if there is anything that can be done to correct this rollback? I would really appreciate it, as I had already completed the Elite Four before the crash. Thank you. My user: Regiane

Yes it has, ty!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ATENTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!This guide is outdated!!!!!!!!!!!! (But not useless, if you use your brain) If you want to train, either use Trainer Tower (refer to Bhimoso's guide for that one) or use the generic info to reevaluate the areaes, Levels didn't change just spawns. Also the Exp-System was changed, evolving no longer increases the amount of exp to level, so feel free to evolve your pokemon to make use of better stats.

You need to first unlock the Crater town dungeon, which requires having done the Kyurem & Zekrom quest and also have seen data of all gen 5 pokemon, excluding Legendaries. When those prerequisite are met, we can do the dungeon to obtain Victini. Victini Dungeon requires at least 5 non-guild members to create a party and enter the dungeon. I will assemble a team. Inside the dungeon, you need to kill 7 starmies and successfully complete the dungeon to get Victini. You simply have to follow me and I'll show all the locations. So it will basically be a hard carry, where you only have to do the absolute minimum, while my team clears the rest. Which option would you like to purchase? 1. Victini service for 1.2m 2. Victini + Time Flute service for 1.5m More information is available here: https://pokemonrevolution.net/forum/topic/242719-dungeon-service-for-meloetta-victini-crux-of-melody-dungeon-ruins-of-the-vale-dungeon/

bump

+1

bump

+1

+1 if buyer can bid from ingame -1 if using old methods using ss and stuff, also for now, its not that hard to just login on forum

Sir, i am facing a Glitch When I try to select the Pokémon Shop option, it simply won't select. The PvP option works fine, but I can't select the 'Selling Pokémon' or 'Pokémon Shop' options. What should I do? Is this a bug with the forum? Plz fix this

Quest service summer pt 1 and 2. Thnx much, GLhf!

+1

+1

Having a hard time giving this a straight +1 or -1. The suggestion is reducing the current 7-day period down to 3 days. In practice though, that means asking Trade Moderators to step in sooner. I can understand the argument that this would get sellers their Pokédollars faster, but at the same time, what if another seller simply isn't ready within those 3 days for whatever reason? The current 7 days gives both sides a decent amount of breathing room without anyone having to get involved (vice versa, whether it's the buyer or the seller, I think 7 days is a reasonable amount of time for either side to get things figured out). The other part I'm unsure about is allowing the buyer and seller to mutually agree to extend it from 3 days back to 7. I understand the idea behind it and why that sounds more flexible, but I don't really think the players should be the ones making that call. If both sides agree to an extension, now the Trade Moderators have another thing to deal with. They may have to verify that both people agreed, check Discord or in-game messages, deal with disagreements over what was said, etc. That's my concern with the suggestion. It may sound easier or more convenient, and I understand the benefits pointed out, but it also introduces extra work/potentially more situations for moderators to sort out. I also think going from 7 days to 3 days could end up benefiting one side more than the other depending on the situation (under a lot of circumstances). Then adding a mutual extension system on top of that feels like we're creating another process just to compensate for shortening the original one. So I can't really say it's a definite -1 because I understand why some would want it, but I'm not convinced it's worth changing the current system either. If I had to lean one way, I'd probably lean against it. The 7-day period might be slower, but it's simple, gives everyone enough breathing room, and doesn't create another headache for Trade Moderators to deal with.

-1 sometimes buyer or seller may not be able and do the transaction for some reason, especially during working days. Having 7 days it's secured that there is a weekend included for players to find the time to complete the trade. Otherwise when that period is like 3 days and the trade may not be able to be completed because it's too short, it wouldn't be fair to have to pay 10%/10k for the forced trade due to the small window. Also it would increase the workload of Trade Moderators by a lot but staff members are volunteering in their free time. It's the player's responsibility to try and complete the trade since they were interested in that transaction.

-1 what if the owner put the bid too late and the auction ends before the owner uploads that bid.

Hydreigon 21+ sold

Anybody know how much a shiney totodile or evo would go for?

+1 and -1. To revert back to allowing the owner to post the bid on a player's behalf...I get it. Sure, that's fine, and I can understand why some would prefer it that way. In theory, having both options may be the best of both worlds. But there's a reason we moved away from the old system. Screenshots can be disputed, taken out of context/faked, arguing over who bid what. The current system removes that grey area. The player logs in, places the bid themselves, and it's there for everyone to see. It's cleaner, more transparent and far easier to verify. Sometimes what seems more convenient isn't necessarily what's better for the system overall. Having the option to place a bid in-game and have it automatically reflected on the forum would be nice. The problem is that it would probably require additional coding to make sure the bid is accepted in-game and then correctly translated and displayed on the forum. That's more work to add to an already existing system, maybe it's something that happens later. For now though, I don't really see the current system as much of an inconvenience. Logging into the forum and placing a bid takes a matter of seconds. I'd understand the frustration if it were a lengthy/complicated process, but it really isn't. It just requires some willingness from the player to log in and post the bid themselves. Having both options might be nice. At the same time, I don't think the new setup is asking too much of anyone either. For the time being, I think it works well enough.

Wtb h.a oshowat ping me if u have any

+2

+1

Current RuleUnder the current trading system, if a seller and buyer do not complete their trade within 7 days, the trade will be automatically forced. While this rule may help ensure trades are eventually completed, the 7-day waiting period can create problems for both sides. Problems with the Current SystemFor Sellers: Once an item/Pokémon is involved in a trade, the seller has to wait 7 days if the buyer does not complete the trade. This means the seller cannot list the item/Pokémon in the forum again during this period which can be especially frustrating when a buyer makes a false bid, changes their mind, or simply stops responding. For Buyers: If a trade is stuck, the buyer may have to wait up to 7 days before the trade is resolved. During this time, they cannot properly obtain the item/Pokémon they need. This can be inconvenient when the item/Pokémon is needed immediately for other purposes. Suggested ChangeI suggest reducing the normal waiting period from 7 days to 3 days. After 3 days, if both parties have not completed the trade, the trade would be automatically forced as it currently is. However, there could be an option to extend the waiting period to 7 days when both parties agree that they need more time. For example: Normal trade: Automatically forced after 3 days. Extended trade: Can be extended to 7 days if the buyer or seller requests additional time through DM and the other party agrees. Alternatively, the trading system could allow players to set their preferred trade date when making or accepting a trade. Why This Would Be BetterThis change would make the trading system more flexible while still preventing trades from remaining unresolved indefinitely. A 3-day default would: Reduce the impact of false or abandoned bids. Allow sellers to relist their Pokémon/items sooner. Allow buyers to obtain their desired Pokémon/items sooner. Encourage players to communicate and complete trades promptly. Still give players the option to take more time when there is a legitimate reason. At the same time, allowing an agreed 7-day extension would prevent the shorter deadline from negatively affecting players who genuinely need more time. ExampleCurrent system: Suggested system: Overall, I believe changing the default waiting period from 7 days to 3 days, while allowing mutually agreed extensions, would make the trading system faster, more flexible, and less frustrating for both buyers and sellers.