Jump to content

Idkup

Registered User
  • Posts

    514
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by Idkup

  1. you forget there are people on both sides of the screen. the people complaining about prehax have said much worse to others. i get you want to stick it to "the man" but that doesn't exist in this situation. staff have zero incentive or requirement to hold themselves to a higher standard when speaking casually. people simultaneously treat staff with ridiculous deference while complaining about staff egos they inflate themselves. id say that players should treat staff like other players but frankly a not insignificant amount of this community treats other people terribly, so i guess ill just say that everyone should be respectful but not deferential to each other, regardless of whether or not that person is staff. would go a long way towards bridging that gap.
  2. flaming people isn't a healthy way to vent go outside :]
  3. thats fine but my point is this thread has gone off the rails disproportionately targeting q8 when theres real problems that affect players a lot more than prehax being mean
  4. if these are true you guys should really take issue with the staff issuing those bans because i think we all agree they're ridiculous and indefensible, no?
  5. good luck getting someone banned because they called you stupid
  6. just rename this topic to prehax hate thread already y'all ask for more communication from staff, he communicates his opinions and doesn't veil them behind diplomatic language - is this not the transparency people ask for? his dismissiveness of opinions he doesnt agree with is the primary issue between staff and players? please. not everyone is good at putting on a fake smile and lying to your face that they'll "think about it." makes perfect sense why others avoid interacting with this community like the plague. good riddance.
  7. Clefable according to this thread:
  8. ik we talked about this in DM but I really feel that both Lati twins being ranked below mons like Bisharp, Weavile, and Zapdos is a massive travesty and makes no sense - Scarf Tyranitar is not common enough to keep them from being by far the best Keldeo answers for teams that care about tempo - Latios's draco meteor is an insane special nuke and Latias has more utility than 95% of the tier. Alakazam-M (51% on-paper 2hkos) and Medicham-M (mediocre speed tier, garbage bulk) are both overrated imo, Diancie is better than them in general with 110 speed tier + unique typing + magic bounce, but we talked about this as well. just wanted to post my thoughts to maybe start some discussion
  9. Player name: idkup Showdown name: idkup Server: Gold Timezone: GMT-5 Rank on ladder: 14
  10. just do 11 years of solaceon, 50% chance you'll get a playable thundurus from it
  11. So: - Rerolls are currently always in demand, because "elite" players want "epic" legendaries. - Rerolls will remain always in demand if it is reasonable to obtain decent legendaries. Instead of the ultra-rich spending 844 rerolls on an HP Ice Thundurus that may or may not appear, more average players will spend 10 or 20 rerolls to obtain playable legendaries, which is something that is currently out of their reach. Rich players will reroll more niche legendaries for experimentation - think of all the Kyurem and Moltres rotting in players' boxes right now. Are they bad Pokemon? Not necessarily, but the current system makes it more or less impossible to justify spending rerolls improving their stats. More reasonable numbers will only increase demand, not reduce it.
  12. Reroll tickets currently sell for ~750k. If we assess the value of a playable legendary at 10M, it is only worth spending 13.3 rerolls on a legendary at their current price. As the numbers in this post demonstrate, that investment is not likely to yield a playable legendary. This shows that rerolls are currently priced based on their scarcity, not their value - I would expect little (if any) change in price if rerolls are buffed or other ways of improving legendary stats are introduced.
  13. Much has been said about how annoying and expensive it is to reroll your legendary Pokemon. With the amount of powerful legendary Pokemon being released, this is a bigger problem than ever before. It is currently difficult to imagine a properly constructed PvP team without at least one legendary - the likes of Landorus-T, Tornadus-T, Thundurus, Manaphy, and Mega Diancie simply have no comparable huntable replacement. Because of this, I would like to present a mathematical analysis on how difficult it is to obtain a legendary that is able to function in its role - having sufficient speed to maintain its speed tier, and the correct hidden power if necessary. I will only look for average secondary stats (HP, offenses, defenses >= 15). These statistics were computed using a script that simulates rerolling a legendary over and over until it meets certain parameters. This was posted in the PvP forum as it is most relevant to PvP players. First, let's consider this (admittedly subjective) list of essential legendaries: Essential: Niche: Let's consider only the 10 legendaries listed as essential. Here are the speed IVs they must meet to remain in their speed tier: Let's take a look at how many rerolls it would take to obtain bare minimum speed, reasonable secondary stats, and Hidden Power if necessary (Mean | Median # rerolls necessary in 10,000 simulations rounded to nearest integer): Sum total: 1877 mean / 1305 median reroll tickets needed for simply playable stats. Source code can be provided if anyone is interested in double-checking my work, but arithmetic will show that these numbers are reasonable. I think no one will disagree when I say this is unrealistic for the vast majority of the playerbase. Of course, the primary offender is Hidden Power, but I would consider these numbers unacceptable even without the [Ice] electrics. As frustrating as it is for players, I can't imagine it's profitable for the game, either - with these numbers most players simply won't bother rerolling, weakening the economy. My best suggestion for mitigating this issue is allowing players to grind to increase their legendaries' IVs up to a maximum of 15. I'd love to hear any alternative ideas. As an aside, this forum needs actual moderation. The Greninja thread was a cesspool of low-effort posts and blatant misinformation - Keita eventually closed it, but ideally we would be able to engage in productive discussion without these sorts of distractions.
  14. why is anyone even talking about unpredictability greninja only needs 4 moves to be beyond broken it should always be running 3 of those 4 moves any other set is hard trolling and makes greninja look balanced Greninja @ Life Orb Ability: Protean Timid Nature 252 SpA 252 Spe 4 Def - Ice Beam - Hydro Pump - Spikes - Extrasensory / Hidden Power Grass anything you need other coverage to hit you can just spikestack on, the only defoggers allowed to play the game are mantine, spdef mew, and empoleon (lol) i dont think i need to explain why stacking spikes on a mon with infinite offensive pressure is broken asf
  15. YEP 100% BALANCED no need for any action i havent played pokemon in months, dont ban gren mawile please i need my free rating
  16. Spikes.
  17. I agree with the bulk of this post, but I do not think the slight additional bulk of Impish Garchomp (which still has no recovery) ever justifies running this set over a corresponding Jolly set with an appropriate speed tier. Most of your suggested changes have been implemented. As for Bold Manaphy, I think the set needs to see some more experimentation. I tried 252 HP Timid CM Manaphy a while back in full stall and it was reasonably functional, but I'm not convinced it's better than Suicune.
  18. Changelog 6/30/2020: As I have been actively laddering this season, this update is rather large. A lot of Pokemon's rankings have been shifted downward, D rank has been removed, and C rank's definition has been clarified. Here is the full log of changes: rotom-wash -> A+ tornadus-t -> A+ azumarill -> A bisharp -> A chansey -> A ferrothorn: relaxed / sassy garchomp: jolly / naive gengar -> A greninja -> S heatran: timid / calm / modest landorus-i -> A gliscor -> A+ magnezone -> A- serperior -> A- tangrowth -> A+ togekiss -> A- breloom: jolly / adamant hippowdon -> B+ hydreigon -> B+ infernape -> B kommo-o -> B+ skarmory -> B+ suicune -> B+ thundurus-t -> B+ azelf -> B conkeldurr -> B- entei -> B heracross: jolly / adamant -> B nidoking -> B salamence -> B scolipede -> B staraptor -> B starmie -> B aerodactyl -> C+ alakazam -> C+ chandelure -> B+ gyarados -> B- darmanitan -> C+ jellicent -> C+ kabutops: jolly / adamant krookodile -> C mantine -> C milotic -> C- slowbro -> B arcanine -> C- empoleon -> C gastrodon: sassy / relaxed -> B- gligar -> UNR jolteon -> C- haxorus -> C- machamp -> UNR medicham -> C omastar -> C nidoqueen -> C- porygon-z -> UNR tyrantrum -> C venomoth -> C- venusaur -> B- articuno -> C- blissey -> C- florges -> C- gardevoir -> C- mienshao -> UNR stoutland -> C- whimsicott -> C- flygon -> UNR mesprit -> UNR noivern -> UNR scrafty -> UNR torkoal -> B- weezing -> UNR cradily -> UNR donphan -> UNR emboar -> UNR exeggutor-alolan -> UNR gallade -> UNR honchkrow -> UNR lanturn -> UNR magmortar -> UNR marowak -> UNR miltank -> UNR qwilfish -> C- ninetales -> UNR rhyperior -> UNR rotom-mow -> UNR sableye -> UNR sandslash-alolan -> C- sharpedo -> UNR shaymin -> C- slowking -> C- snorlax -> UNR victreebel-> UNR yanmega -> UNR poliwrath -> C- It would take ages to explain all of these changes, so I'll go over a select few. Rotom-Wash -> A+ Rotom-W is as good as ever, but it is not on the same level as the two Pokemon that now occupy S-rank. Tornadus-T -> A+ I underestimated how unreliable Hurricane is. Tornadus-T is still great, but it cannot function as a sole check to the wide variety of threats it covers in theory. Chansey -> A, Skarmory -> B+, et al. Stall is no longer the strongest archetype in the game. The onslaught of new threats has made its life a little more difficult. Gengar -> A Gengar faces stiff competition from Greninja and Tornadus-Therian, which can fill similar attacking roles while providing much more utility to the team. Greninja -> S This Pokemon is broken and should have been banned two years ago. Greninja has scarce few answers for its massive attacking movepool. When faced with these answers, it can simply set Spikes on the switch and proceed to get out. Hidden Power Grass and Ice Beam allow Greninja to deny every relevant Defog user in the game (sorry Mantine and Empoleon), which makes it very effective at keeping Spikes up, unlike most other users of the move. This quality allows it to tear down defensive teams by itself - the amount of Ferrothorn, Heatran, and even Chansey that I've been able to smash with Specs Latios's Psychic thanks to Spikes pressure from Greninja has been absolutely absurd. When playing Spikes Greninja, there is no need for a dedicated stallbreaker. Simply keeping up offensive pressure is sufficient. As for why I didn't come to this conclusion earlier? For a decent amount of time, I considered Gunk Shot necessary on Greninja. As nice as the coverage is, it does not deal with Rotom-Wash, one of the most prominent Defog users in the game - allowing it to remove Spikes set by Greninja fairly reliably - resulting in no progress being made by the Greninja player. Hidden Power Grass removes this issue entirely (Grass Knot cannot be used due to its pitiful base power against Rotom). Proper handling of its weakness to priority is also of utmost importance - I tried to fit Greninja on extremely offensive teams that already tend to struggle against priority. With these issues resolved, Greninja is a terrifying force - an offensive Pokemon with an excellent speed tier, no true answers, and the ability to destroy defensive teams on its own. Landorus-I -> A As much as people want this Pokemon banned, it's frankly just a worse Greninja. Its lower speed tier is not made up for by its marginally increased breaking power, while Greninja's Ice Beam is a much more spammable attack than Landorus's Earth Power. Stealth Rock is better than Spikes, but also has many more viable users. If Greninja is enough to demolish stall, there is not as much of a need for a slower option which is considerably worse against offense. Gliscor -> A+ Gliscor is incredibly easy to fit on virtually any team. With the correct set, it can handle a number of top-tier threats for any team - Bisharp, Clefable, Gengar, Heatran, et al. It is never the best counter for something, but its durability allows it to serve as a fairly solid check. Poison Heal and the ability to stallbreak with Taunt set it apart from Landorus-T.
  19. "really big and unfair advantage" No. Just no. Half the ladder playerbase knows what my teams are and it doesn't really matter, because anyone with the skill to pose a challenge would have extrapolated likely sets to a point where they can play accurately by Team Preview. In fact, it's almost easier to deal with someone that knows your team, because they will often think linearly rather than completely. No one on ladder is going to bother to directly counterteam a single player. If you see a Volcarona paired with two solid Heatran answers, it's probably not Hidden Power Ground. With regard to the suggestion at large, it seems infeasible because of the difficulty it would impose on moderation. Anonymity also makes people bolder in the face of rules, which would be a further negative impact on a community that can be somewhat toxic already. Regarding being "exposed" on Youtube: Everyone loses. So what? -1
  20. Unless you're playing Aurora Veil (RIP Baton Pass) or other one-dimensional hyper-offense builds, this is utterly and dangerously untrue. Unless your team is so aggressive that your gameplan is the same every game (just kill everything lol), regardless of your opponent's decisions, you have to interact with your opponent. This renders it necessary to adjust your strategy in response to your opponent, which usually means calculating lines to a depth of at least 3 turns - easily taking at least 30 seconds to consider just reasonable options.
  21. Regardless of the numbers, being able to bank time for critical turns by moving quickly on other turns is of utmost importance. Per-turn time should be applied as an increment.
  22. username: idkup server: gold country: usa
×
×
  • Create New...