Heroofthestreet

Buy ada scizor and breloom

400k for charizard

I wasn't referring to "every" specialized PvEr being narrow minded, then most (which can be seen in my post). I'm possibly even wrong with this one, as that's probably not even the case. Usually the minority is always the loudest on the internet (in this case, referring to the kind of people I had described) so I got a bit carried away. My apologies. Anyway I didn't speficially call you out for whinning, then the PvErs (hence why I mentioned them in the bracket). I'm not exclusively a PvPer either, as I also do PvE related stuff (mainly bosses). PvP is my main point of interest tho, so at times it becomes really frustrating to see how it despite being neglected, still gets trashed on by those who have nothing to do with it whatsover (not talking about you in this particular case). From reading your reply, I see you are a reasonable, polite guy that is definitely up for constructive criticism. We definitely need more of such people in this community. Am glad we're also on the same page about priorities and PvP related stuff. As such, I got nothing else to say. Cheers

Something similar would probably be the best sollution, but generally I don't mind. In my opinion, with the things the guild island provides, it wasn't made any "broken' and therefore it doesn't provide any leverage over other guilds who don't have the access to it. Pokemon has never just been about PvP to begin with. In the early days of Pokemon, the only thing you did was PvE. Only the newer Gens introduced PvP and made it popular. But that doesn't mean you can entirely disband the concept of Guilds focusing more on PvE instead, whereas you can only focus on PvP to be rewarded. That's not how it should work at all. The entire guild system is kind of a facepalm situation if you look at it from a non-guild member's perspective. As stated above on the OP, it has caused a lot of issues, compared to solving any, if any at all? People leaving guilds to get into a stronger guild? Possibly stronger guilds kicking players to get more powerful PvP players to secure top 3? It has / will cause future guilds to disband / possibly scramble for powerful PvP players, and is that the development PRO really needs? Where is the fun in being in a guild then, if you cannot get rewarded for your hard work? Unless you PvP your entire guild to top 3? Do guilds really have to host giveaways, lend pokes or give out in-game items to survive from their own pockets? While people in PvP Guilds don't really need to do all that, because PRO essentially rewards that guild exclusively? But what should a guild be like then? I know my post is probably gonna be looked down at with evil murderous eyes from those top 3 guild players. Because they believe they've deserved it. But be real. Do you really think so? Well, I'll let you dwell on this while reading my point below. And then you can ask yourself again, if you really deserve the reward, compared to the counterpart guilds. Well while you're dwelling on the question above, let me tell you one thing. The amount of time you've grinded for a high PvP rank, a few 1000+ players in guilds have used the same amount of time on helping guild members fight PvE / Bosses. And yet you should be rewarded with something exclusive for your guild? And not the guild who help players out with PvE? I just can't see how that is any fair at all for the counterpart guilds, who don't focus on PvP. Or guilds that don't own the top PvP players on the ladder and can't at all even the odds. Now, ask yourself, do you still deserve the reward? If yes, you don't see the bigger picture. If someone's being narrow minded and not seeing the bigger picture, it's mainly the PvErs. You people get PvE related events on a regular, weekly basis, while the PvPers literally have to wait for months in order to just satisfy themselves with a minor PvP update. Yet this doesn't prevent you (many PvErs) to continue on whinning whenever PvPers get something good/exclusive, although it's completely obvious who in reality is actually being neglected

Found. Can be closed

Atk: +25 Speed: +30 Everything else +20. Doesn't need to be gale wings

Corona challenge. What a brilliant name kek

Yeah, it's really practical to wait in a dead queue forever in order to find one match (the unranked one) or to bother other people/your friends for something that you should be able to do without them. Tell me, is it really necessary to talk like this? Patronizing and boasting from a player who has barely 640h in game and is here for less than a year, while obviously having no clue about pvp? To not only me, but also other vet players? Feels as if i would be telling the devs how to code stuff in an arrogant, patronizing manner like i drained all the knowledge of the world, while in reality i have no clue about coding. That being said, i'm done with you as it's more or less impossible to discuss with you. Feel free to keep commenting on the topic and spiting venom on others if it makes you happy

More or less agree and have nothing against. I'd just add being allowed to have only 2 same legends (on two accounts) instead of 4

The point is to try different teams during the same season on two accounts (with legends included), instead of dropping points/the win ratio on the account with which you're planning to achieve ending on the ladder, while attaining fun at the same time. From the comments you left so far, it's pretty obvious you're not a pvper yourself, which is perfectly fine, but when trying to discuss something you should strive to put yourself into the shoes of everyone included in the discussion/topic, in order to get a wider view on the whole idea, instead of looking at things narrowly. For instance, it happens so often that at some point during the ladder season you already have a high amount of points on the account you're hitting the ladder with, but the ladder itself is still far away from ending (like 10-15 days before the end of month), which basically prevents you to try playing anything else on it beside the team you were using so far. This is just one of the situations where the suggested idea comes into play. Other include testing teams with legends on the alt before using them on the main (which in theory is possible, but in practise it is more or less impossible if you want your team to have a legend with good ivs which is not easy to get as you need to invest rerolls) and generally allowing you to play the same stuff on the alt as on your main, without any limits. Also regarding the connection between doing bosses and trading legendaries. Generic boss teams that are supposed to beat most (if not all bosses) are already existing and as far as i know, none of them really needs a legendary in order to succeed, which means you can trade those pokes to your alt and main back and forth as soon as you unlocked trading pokes from a certain region to your alt, which just shows how pointless of an argument that you gave was

Kek. Thx for giving me a good laugh today. Is definitely pointless to keep on discussing with our magnificent majesty. Have a good day my king

To be fair, many other things have already been implemented in the game that could be considered as 'defeating the purpose of an MMORPG play style', from black ms to nature and reroll tickets themselves. I could go further as i'm generally not satisfied regarding how some things work in this game, but it would be pointless

Huh, where should i start? Ok, i'll go through each point of yours. 1 - This is a concern i brought up in the introduction of the topic, where i specifically asked staff is it anyhow possible to make this a thing in game, implying that i'm looking forward for their feedback on this 2 - I said it should be limited to only one alt as you're allowed to pvp with only two accounts and this way imo it wouldn't be unbalanced/broken 3 - According to all i said so far, you are allowed to 'try your luck' with catching only twice; once with your main and once with your alt. Rerolls would have the same impact they have now (if not even slightly more) as you would still need to use them for most of time in order to get an epic legendary 4 - Basically nothing would be changed in this regard, if anything, rerolls would become more valuable 5 - This is a valid argument, but still you wouldn't be able to catch all legendaries with two accounts without doing the world quest, which means it would still pay off 6 - With all my points brought up so far, pretty obvious that the reroll tickets would still be worth a lot and in demand, if not even more than they are right now 7 - Hah, there's a plenty of stuff to do always, even if you'd be able to trade legends on milions of accounts; such as pvping, doing bosses, farming 8 - A legendary isn't made up powerful just because of having +599 stats. It can still suck. Just look at regice and regirock. Rerolling legends is an another thing. No one prevents you from doing the same if you really want to 9 - My main reason is to use it on only one alt while pvping on the ladder, so i can freely have fun with using legendaries there too. To test teams and so on, with the good legendaries i have on my main P. S. I see your comment was based only on reading my first comment, where the topic was brought up, but in further comments i emphasized that it should be allowed only on two accounts, not on four or as much as you want

Kyurem is not even broken. Just happens to have stats above 600, as slaking for instance has. Assuming something that might happen without a proof (and real ubers like mewtwo and such, if ever added to the game, will never be allowed in a one tier pvp scene) has nothing to do with this topic. The rule about pvping you posted is true, but stands only for pvping, not ending on the ladder with two accounts from the same person. There is a different rule thst forbids that

This is basically what most of ladder players are doing (obviously without legendaries) and it's legal, so no idea how it can be considered as 'almost boosting'. It is a widely accepted and done practise, so obviously this is only your personal opinion and preference. Also gotta deny the ending part of your reply; you're only allowed to have one account on the pvp ladder at the end of the month. Having two is severely punishable

It obviously limits the flexibility i have. In other words, once i would transfer the legendary to my alt, i can't transfer it back to my main whenever i want to

Personally i want this to be implemented because of pvp, therefore what you suggested wouldn't really be practical for both myself and the others who would consider using them mainly for this purpose

If that will be an easier way for staff to implement the whole idea, i'm totally up for it, but even if it would be done this way, staff would basically still run into more or less the same problems as with the trading option i suggested, bar it probably being just easier to trace. For instance, if with both options the legendary wouldn't be bound to only two accounts, people would still be able to lend the legends for enormous sums of money, with the only difference being that the legendary comes back to the original owner after a certain amount time

Forgot to mention that the legendaries should only be allowed to be traded among two accounts, as that's as many accounts as you're allowed to pvp with and definitely wouldn't allow grinders to abuse this

You would still need to do at least one quest for each legendary, be it on your main or alt in order to obtain the legendary. Furthermore, if you would really want to have two same legendaries, be it for being practical in terms of not having to change their nature and ev spread or for using the legend on your alt as a sub for a reroll ticket, nothing would prevent you from doing so

I can definitely see good, valid reasons why it would be hard to implement this (such as it being hard to determine the alt of every person and some people probably misusing this in order to sell or buy great legends for enormous sums of money, which would mean only more work for staff to do in terms on investigating), but i'm really curious is there any way to make this a thing in game and would there be any interest, from both the community and staff to do so? EDIT: Having only two same legendaries from only two accounts should be allowed

Not gonna happen as this exists in the way it is right now to prevent both people and guilds from boosting

It obviously won't even be sold as last time the seller was online was 2 and a half months ago

How is that possible if this is what literally writes among the trade rules, as the third auction rule: According to this, Amarok7 should definitely have won it as after that offer of Raah that happened 2 mins before the end of auction as you have said, the auction was extended for 15 more mins, which means it was supposed to end at 6:21 pm. Meanwhile during that time, as we can see, Amarok7 bided at 6:15 pm which means the auction should have been extended for another 15 mins, up to 6:30 pm. As no one bided during that time, Amarok7 should have won

Nope. Amarok won it as you bided last min and that's when the auction gets extended for additional 15 mins. He bided after that and no one bided after him within the next 15 mins, so he actually won. Either way make sure to tag a trade mod to avoid further confusion