Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/23/21 in all areas
-
Now, many of you may have been confused by the sly wordplay I added to the title, but the suggestion is simple: - Prohibit players to ladder on both servers And for all people wondering, this is not hard to do, one simple way is just to watch the results of top 25 ladder, and punish those who break the rule. It's simple, and how it's already done for two accounts, this time it just varies for one account by server. Which should be easier to find because they have the same name Why, on two questions, I see being asked. Why does it concern me, g3n3r4l, a low ladder, not very PvP skilled player, but can fend for myself when it comes to it. And the other question, why should this be added. To answer both, in recent months, the ladder has been littered with the same players on repeat getting the same rewards by doing the same thing as they always do, which is respectable, congratulations for grinding. The problem here, is that there are still many other people that try and ladder, and are almost able to get there, but in the end can't. Why can't they? Because someone else is on the ladder, logically. And who might this be, perhaps on of the dozens of people that have already been laddering on both servers. The outcome of this is simple, there will in turn be more players able to play in the Ladder tournament, as it will total to a maximum of 50, as neither server will have the same people laddered, and it will also prevent a single player from gaining double rewards. This will in turn deflate the PvP market, lower the economy's value on many things, and provide less PvP shop items to be sold in the masses from these players. Now considering there is already the PvP rule saying: Now what this says, is already clear. Players cannot ladder (Top 25) with 2 accounts. So how is that any different to different servers ladders. Players are free to transfer once every 30 days, which is ample time to ladder on one server, then transfer and ladder on the other.2 points
-
I do not agree with this proposal due to several options. 1- As you all know, it is not easy to be on the ladder, if a person has the possibility of being on both servers, why not? 2- I believe that this does not promote frustration but rather the motivation to try to get on the ladder. 3- to finalize my opinion and my contribution to this issue, I believe that the trick is to surpass oneself and not make the system easier, otherwise it would be boring and would not have the merit it deserves to be on the ladder.2 points
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Auction for this Beauty! Info about the trade: Current Offer: 3M by @NarutoUzumaki12 Insta: 8M Minimum Raise: 200K Duration: Ends 8:34 AM +0 GMT / 26 March! Server: Gold but if Silver want to buy they are more than free to come to Gold to pick it up! A bid placed in the last 15 minutes of the auction will extend the auction with 15 minutes from the time the bid was made! Contact Information: IGN: GoldenP1kachu Discord: GoldenP1kachu#5423 Acceptable payment methods: Pokedollars Coin Capsules: 350K IV Reroll: 700K Nature Reroll: 350K Ability Capsule: 650K HAPPY BIDDING1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Welcome to PRO and a beautiful community If you need any help feel free to contact me in forums DMs or my discord ( JustIce#4814 ).1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
+1 However, instead of a Showcase, how about having just a favorite field with your 3 favorite Pokemon (Strongest, Rarest, Cutest etc) While a showcase would be nice, I'm sure that the Developers would die from trying to code that in, literally. From what I've heard, they are still reworking parts of the code each day, since its all basically Spaghetti since they took it over. I'm not trying to state that your suggestion is impossible and that I don't want to see it being implemented. Rather the opposite, I think its a good suggestion and I would want to see something like that being implemented into the game at some point. But it might not be applicable for the developers to implement something like this right now. So I tried to take your idea and lightweight it into something similiar, which could act as a temporary solution. Here is a rough mockup of what I messed around with in Photoshop, but presented in a cute-ish way. I included a mockup for both the "Self View" card and the "Inspect player" card. Something to consider: To utilize the OP's suggestion and my lightweight idea to its maximum, they should consider adding the preview window support for the Pokemon listed. And by "preview window", I refer to the one displayed when linking a Pokemon in chat or when a wild Pokemon is caught with a full party.1 point
-
Hey, the money-losing penalty is part of the game. You beat NPCs you get money, you lose to NPCs you lose money. This will not be possible anymore after reconnect is implemented. Once you logout in a battle you'll log into the battle again. It's just a matter of time until this mechanic is outdated. I am not saying it's a perfect mechanic and I am always open to suggestions but completely removing it won't happen for the time being. We also capped the money you can lose to $50,000 for veterans that own millions. Users with small budgets lose 5% of their total money which can be obtained again fairly fast.1 point
-
1 point
-
Hi @WilliWu Be warned that the Rules also apply on the forum, and any comments containing inappropriate language or insults directed at other players have been deleted. This is a verbal warning, continued behaviour and language like this will result in a formal forum warning being applied to your account. This thread has also been locked as requested.1 point
-
0 points
-
0 points
-
I dont like the UU idea, and Im happy that the staff team respected my opinion and some others opinion so much and didnt implement the UU queue yet. Very happy, continue your work!0 points